Remote Viewing and ESP

Remote viewing is a protocol-based process of information acquisition via ESP. Anything, anywhere in space and time is accessible to your consciousness and you can demonstrate this to yourself. Simply follow the instructions in picrelated and post your results in this thread. If you have tried that and it has sparked your interest, read the attached PDF.(I removed the Discord link from the post.)

Tried it. I guess the image is kinda sorta related to the stuff I wrote down and drew but I have to stretch it.

I have been doing remote viewing recently and I feel very conflicted about it. On the one hand I tried it and it kinda works. I am able to grab some images out and some ideas that are so specific to the images that random chance or guessing cannot explain the ability. On the other hand I am extremely apposed to something so unscientific such as psychic abilities. Are there Situations where remote viewing can negatively affect my life? Such as seeing something horrific? Are there any ways of reducing incorrect information that shows up during remote viewing sessions? such as writing AOL's that show up? What is the best technique for remote viewing? right now im just writing down whatever comes to my mind. I have not used AOL's yet because I just recently learned about them.

>follow the instructions in picrelated and post your results in this thread. My drawing has nothing related to the image, maybe some words do, but nothing more. Am i done something wrong?

>>6080 >Skeptical of psi? >VIsit my website -_-

>>6080 Didn't work I imagined a snake flying into the world trade center and the image is just a bunch of black and white firefighters.

when you write down nonsense, your brain can relate that to anything if you put your mind to it, especially if a third party tells you that nonsense is actually X or Y. honestly this /x/ tier soykaf just muddles the board with nonsense, this one is just a website advertisement for fuarrrks sake.

While I'm not clicking any of that soykaf, it is notable that the US military experimented with remote viewing. Obviously their results one way or another would be obfuscated to disallow reiteration, but from memory >Only 1 in 5 people have a voice in their head they use to think(disgusting to be honest, everyone should have this.) >Other sensory standards include discrete perception and remote perception >Personnel with remote perception were singled out and studied to measure the viability of its use The only conclusion I can see as concrete is that individuals only exhibit a single form of these various modes of perception. And while I don't believe in magic, "remote viewing" isn't explicitly impossible given the dynamics of quantum mechanics, and other organisms exist that evolved organs that utilize these specific phenomena, a field of research known as "quantum biology." Certainly interesting to anyone actually itt.

>>6126 >>only 1 in 5 people are sentient self-aware human beings checks out i guess.

>>6126 >explicitly impossible given the dynamics of quantum mechanics I mean, you don't even need to appeal to quantum mechanics. There's no physical theory that rules it out. The only thing that makes it dubious to me is that there's no clear mechanism by which it works, and I've never actually seen it work.

https://youtu.be/-WUaS_Ynd_M?si=Sifrw4of5tFSDMe2

>>6126 >"ooh look at me, I'm an intellectually superior ubermensch because I have to crystallize all of my thoughts into the limited framework of language before I can even recognize them as thoughts and manipulate/connect/engage with them, I literally can't think without verbalizing everything all the time and my cognitive experience is so narrow that I can't conceive of any other way of doing things, everyone should be like me"

>>6577 the weird thing is how intutive this perspective you are mocking is- like I automatically synthesized this sort of perspective before realizing on closer reflection that I don't typically use any sort of verbalization for my regular thoughts, unless I am thinking in sort of deep yet manic way or imagining a conversation with someone. I saw a meme like your post that described internal monologue-rs as people reading their actions off of a script.

Frankly, Remote Viewing and ESP... It's getting a bit tiring believing in them. Its just in my mind deep down i know that if any of the people who claim to remote view or ESP on the internet would falter or fail if asked to do something significant with or even simply prove they are actually doing what they claim to be doing. I just can barely even entertain the thought anymore of any of it actually making sense if it even was true.

>>6103 is this craftplacer from the webring?

>>6125 they have mind control but you clearly don't understand how it works and are ironically falling for the occult obfuscation that is central to how that mind control works. if you convince people that something is paranormal and outside the bounds of rational inquiry then you can use that to prevent them from using their rational mind to come to rational conclusions, even people who are acutely aware of the conceit fall for it because it takes advantage of self-doubt and it is fundamental to all aspects of occult manipulation

>>6581 It's an interesting topic. Thinking in "words" or "pictures" is a false dichotomy. Look up "unsymbolized thought" or "unsymbolized thinking" on youtube or elicit.org or google scholar

One day people will remote view the elites in their bunkers and hunt them down like dogs to the last man.

>>6080 Encouraging everyone to try this.

>>6634 >One day people will remote view the elites in their bunkers and hunt them down like dogs to the last man. Apparently people have already tried that, but they have some sort of protection going on against this. I remember reading an /x/ post on 4chan about someone remote viewing places like Area 51. The people there noticed the anon, smiled and cut the connection so to speak. Or maybe it was in some Polish place. Anyway, I think Lain should be really careful with it, wouldn't want the glowies to catch you.

>>6731 >This technology can only be used for trivial BS, those damn dirty elites have already locked it down with their psychic DRM How convenient! I once dreamed that I was visited by someone I knew online. It felt incredibly real. To confirm it, we worked out a signal that would unequivocally tell if we had actually made contact in our dreams. I used the signal. They didn't reply with the pre-arranged response. To be clear: this is someone who absolutely does believe in astral projection and all that stuff.

>>6735 You're not an expert in any of the things in that chart, so you wouldn't be able to identify if these things were being used or udner what conditions they would be utilized. For example the military example is retarded. We've had biological and electromagnetic neuroweapons for the last 50 years, they aren't used overtly because they aren't needed. Wars are not fought for survival, they're fought for central banks and to keep the honey bees in terror and dependency under their governments which are enslaved by central banks. A moloch cult (aetheric energy harvesting, ie moloch is a reified economy metaphor) going back to ancient Egypt has been doing this for milennia.

>>6747 >You're not an expert in any of the things in that chart, I'm almost certainly an expert on relativity compared to anyone else in this thread >We've had biological and electromagnetic neuroweapons for the last 50 years, they aren't used overtly because they aren't needed. And yet, everyone knows they exist >Wars are not fought for survival, They're generally fought to win.

>>6748 >And yet, everyone knows they exist This goes towards proving my point. They don't know even a tenth of it, and what they do know is so severely distorted it's almost a detriment. >They're generally fought to win. Absolutely not. They're fought to survive in the field by the combatants, but other than that you're a piece on the board.

>>6749 >This goes towards proving my point. No, it doesn't. You are claiming that there are entire technologies that are kept under such strict wraps that only you know about it, even though there are lots of people who stand to profit from it that aren't part of the inner cabal. Strangely, very few people seem to be using these technologies to profit at all. >but other than that you're a piece on the board. Yeah, you're a pawn used by people who want to win.

>>6750 >Strangely, very few people seem to be using these technologies to profit at all. This is a priori reasoning. A sign of ignorance.

>>6751 >reasoning based on premises of observation >a priori I don't think you know what that word means

>>6752 This is my last reply to you, I don't want to validate you by allowing you to drain my time and energy. Learn to ask questions. Even if you were a glownoggler / bot I might have given you a lot. As it stands it's better that it's kept from randoms. I found this stuff for a reason and because I'm a certain way, I suppose. Good luck.

>>6080 The first time I described the generic impression you feel when you have a bad posture, think about your person have to breath manually and salivate and it gave me the picture of thunder hitting a mountain. The second time I imagined a village and mote castle where the girl of the lord have a marriage. It gave me the picture of a sad puppy. It don't work. Simple as.

>>6754 I hyperfixated on the number 303, and associated it with Asuka and Yui. A few months later my mother makes friends with this German woman (older), I meet her once, don't think much of it. A few months after that she needs some work done on her house, my mother puts me in contact with her. She's telling me about it, I ask for her address and she says "303". I'm like, huh... I go there, doing the work, etc. She tells me she put her floors down "Oh I don't know, when I was 32, 33, 34". She has to leave, she'll be back at 3:30. It hits me, wait a sec... she has red hair, German, speaks multiple languages, didn't get along with her (somewhat accomplished) mother... ah, but her eyes are green, not blue. Then it hits me, ah, Yui has green eyes. She starts telling me out of the blue that she used to teach science. I ask her what subject, "biology". So the universe pretty much took Asuka and Yui and merged them together under a 303 address. Thinking back that had happened many, many, many times. Another time with an 888 address. When I was hyperfixated on Ergo Proxy, since I was playing the role of Vincent, there had to be a Re-L. Sure enough a woman with that sort of build where she looks taller but isn't, pale skin, blue eyes, long black hair, celestial nose, I suppose has her routine converge with mine. She was oddly fixated on me, like feel myself being watched and turn around, she's staring at me. Couldn't read her expression. When I interacted though it was normal. She seemed expectant. I didn't get it. Actually started avoiding her. (Sad!) Last example. Hadn't seen this girl for years and year, like 10 at least. Had this sort of mental breakdown where several aspects of the past I just never bothered to resolve came flooding back in, and I experienced something like intense separation anxiety. Like I was waking up ten years later and becoming aware that everyone is gone. So I brought the idea of her to mind (the "signature" or "feel" of a person), moved it into a space in the back of my mind, and held it and the idea of running into her somewhere, in a particular way. It has to be placed in the abck of your mind and held there in a aprticular arrangement. A week later I find myself out of my routine and a store a few towas over that I rarely go to. I'm looking down into a cooler, I look up, there she is walking by. This is just the way it works. There are other types of "magic" as well. Mind you I was kind of taught from a young age that your thoughts and intentions influence reality. Rather than that your mind is an isolated closed system that can only act on the world through its coordination of the physical body, thought itself alters reality. Including things coming in 3s, never wish ill on someone or it'll either happen or be done to you instead, etc. That kind of thing. Rather than growing up and putting childish superstitions away, I simply found that they were true. And thensome. But there was a whole course and path of discovery for this, I don't know if it can be effectively taught.

>>6753 >learn to ask questions I'll ask questions of people that might know the answers.

I'm always open to these things but it's also something hard to perceive. >>6755 What you described is called synchronicity.

>>6735 >astrology for financial business planning they actually DO do this.

>>6758 Synchronicity sounds so passive. You can clearly script and force it.

>>6763 But how can you tell something is willed versus being predicted and your sense of willing is only part of determined actions?

>>6764 Eventually you start sorting out whether it's precognition or if you yourself are being controlled. For example the girl from 10 years ago, would I have even been capable of having the thought if it wasn't physically possible? Hard to say. The next confounder would be confirmation bias, ie how many manifestations do you initiate consciously that don't come to pass. The answer is very few. I always feel it click. Same way I can have a number in mind and just let go and write a phrase, and its gematria will match that number. The broader question of predestination is hard to say because it's not possible to achieve omniscience or go outside the universe. It's just as possible that some aprt of me has free will and exists outside the universe, so to prevent me from waking up and leaving this simulation, it tweaks things and works me into a script where I can magically make things happen. When really it's just implanting thoughts and memories, and reading my mind, to arrange things so that I'll be tricked into believing it has anything to do with me. In this model it's basically solipsistic, you can't use the mind, senses, or memory to prove themselves, as it's circular reasoning and the universe as a system could be messing with them at all times.

Confirmation bias in action. Is it brunt? grow up.

>>6766 >grow up All a person needs to hear from you. "Puit magic away and submit, play the game." You're brainwashed. Captured. A lost little light wandering around a dim labyrinth. A flickering flame in the dark that chooses to feel power in the sheer strength and intelligence of his brutal realism, as he circles the drain. "Pathetic".

>>6767 You've deluded yourself into thinking the shadows on the wall are part of a deep mystery, when in fact they are mere distortions of the light.

>>6769 Weird take Lain but okay.

>>6767 I sympathize with you, and agree there's a virtue in avoiding distorting cultural notions like "grow up", but the truth is that this isn't real. Don't let your heart be broken if you come to that conclusion. Don't be dicks to others who don't believe you, their intuition is pretty valid.

>>6080 I did this but no matter how many times I tried it did no work.

>>6080 weren't you the guy doing the /rvg/ general on /x/ a few months ago?

>>6126 >>6129 >Only 1 in 5 people have a voice in their head they use to think(disgusting to be honest, everyone should have this.) I thought that at least here people wouldn't fall for the "NPCs lack internal voice" meme. If you seriously can't think without synthesizing your thoughts verbally, you should be very concerned. Research unsymbolized thought. >>6577 at least this guy gets it.

The interesting thing about ESP isn’t remote viewing but precognition

>>6126 >>6129 >>7833 It's not 1 in 5 and it is thought to be 1 in 10 and it's the other way around. 1 in 10 DON'T have a voice in their head. So majority does have an inner monologue. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976241243004 Though of course I assume even when someone can internally vocalize thoughts it doesn't mean all thoughts are vocalized internally. >>7910 Yes, precog would be more practical.

>>7911 >So majority does have an inner monologue. explains a lot about the state of the world