(untitled)

Lainchan, no onion address why? I can provide hidden service with port forwarding if needed.

This might have been a better post for /q/. My understanding of onion addresses is that that they don't provide the user any more privacy or security than if the user had otherwise been using tor.

Only benefit from using hidden service versus normal site, is protection from evil exits. But of course with https the threat of evil exits should be also really limited.

https rely on certificate authority bundle which means you trust who builds the bundle and who is in the bundle. onion addresses rely on noone but the two parties. with https the domain name is rememberable and neither the authority nor the certificate is usually verified by the user. with onion address getting and verifying the correct address is comparable as if the user were forced to verify the certificate, many times this will not be done in practice but if done once it can be reused a lot of times, https would need be verified each time.

>> 19533 this was asked more than once before Appleman promised to post some decision log but in the end it wasn't posted I want lainchan to have onion address If there is an explanation I would like to know

Moved to >>>/q/11082.