https://archive.ph/MPAHW
>>47836
You don't understand my hypothesis nor will you ever bother, so why are you asking? The core assertion I'm trying to beat into your head is the constellation OF:
-Nonlinear dose response curves
-Priming and sensitization
-Synergistic toxicity
That's it. To weaponize an environment you have to invisibly and covertly weave in all these different small inputs, which have synergistic effects, and therefore achieve a change which is greater than the sum of its parts. With sensitization you can either amplify that, lower the threshold by which it occurs, open up new ways to do it (eg poisoning a specific enzyme system, now low grade toxins can accumulate), or diminish the regenerative and detoxification capacity of the organism.
There are only two things in health and disease.
-Something is not there or usable, which should be (nutrition)
-Something is there which should not be (toxic load)
That's it. They CLAMP, vaccinate, circumcise, halogenate, irradiate... You fuarrrkers, I don't know how many times I have to tell you. This is not hard to comprehend.
UNCLAMP YOUR MIND, Lain!