lainchan / r

(untitled)

Jet Black · 2025-10-21 08:36
I think I have *invented* a rhetoric figure today: "Th|s questi0n d0es n◇t exist" and is designed to adress confusions adressed to you as "questions" yet which have been created not by thinking/logic/analysis of some kind but simply because you're being suggested you're not one of the "normal ones" / being coerced into something by crowd / someone with blunt "volition" seems to reshape the logically same, answered question in new ways. Reason: sometimes, the circumstances are tied to stuff real intelligence has nothing to with - only "emotional "intelligence" does: authority, suggestion, a "hunch" of a "schizo pro" going popular, stubborn's will, or ... yuck. "Empathy". Really, too many prepositions about justifying this or that thing are being forced as "questions standing" Feel free to preserve this idea as yours! I am not a big fan of pushing ideas into publishing anyway. tl;dr if you have been pushed into the necessity between choosing between bad or worse and they keep asking why you're choosing, throwing such a line is important - if tgey think the ask you a qstn, yet it's coming from one's "emotional intelligence" and does not require actual high IQ - say it. with all the LLMs being popular, my line could be rather useful to stop real discussions and treat ones who does not stop as... well... you probably know already.
Guthrie · 2025-10-21 08:49
So you have invented a thought-terminating cliche for something you dislike which no one gonna understand until you explain; and when you do, people will realize you're a schizo and leave you alone.
BloodCat · 2025-10-21 10:30
>>47441 >thought-terminating This part is correct >for something you dislike which no one gonna understand until you explain; not quite, Ive been playing Disco Elysium lately and the game seems to draw a nice boundary between INTELLIGENCE (Logic, Visual analysis and such) - versus PSYCHE (Authority, Empathy, and such) so hey, I invented a cliche yet with an aim to target sneaky questions that puzzle 'tistic people. 'Tism. Not SCH. >and when you do, people will realize you're a schizo nah, it's the main character of said vidya who gets the "schizo" moniker, as he seems to treat his skills and related thoughts as bidozenful of separate personalities
Void · 2025-10-21 10:43
>>47446 SCH'tism to be honest. It's ok fam SCH is the next big underappreciated affliction owing it's lack of grace to increased intelligence, perspective, intuition, or combinations thereof; There can be too much of anything. Blessed are the babbles of the epiphanic.