Tips for lainon to lose weight

I'm currently like 175cm/100kg. I want to start diet just by eating my caloric needs and nothing more. Any tips for me? How do I keep my self discipline? What products should I avoid? Also I wanna build good habits to avoid the jojo effect this time

>>34963 >Any tips for me? * Don't overthink it. Overthinking will lead to failure. * Give yourself a reward for not eating poorly for some n days in a row. For example, if you want to buy a video game or book - Don't allow yourself to until you have gone one week without eating bullshit. * Don't fall into some meme diet. Yes, you will lose a lot of weight doing keto, but not everyone can do keto and you're probably one of them that cannot. * Take supplements. Look into zinc, B-Complex, and iodine. You're very likely missing one, because most people are due to how our food is today. * Do some light exercise. 10 - 15 minutes of cardio can do wonders for your. Light stretching before and after is important. Alternatively, if you do some sort of yoga/taichi/etc, that can be a solid replacement. If you end up wanting to "get jacked", look into other things later, but the important part is cardio+stretching. >How do I keep my self discipline? You just do. Like I said, don't overthink it. You go "I do not want to be fat anymore." and that's all you should need. Spite is a good helpful form, but as shocking as it may sound: it can run out. If you are genuinely really fuarrrking misproportationately large, take a picture of yourself shirtless and post it up in the kitchen or where you tend to order food. It'll serve as a reminder of what you don't want to be anymore. This doesn't work for everyone, but a little vanity can be useful in making yourself less soykafty. >What products should I avoid? Seed oils, high fructose corn syrup, sugar. There's nothing wrong with a little bit of fat/butter, just don't overdo it. Oh and make sure you are taking in proper amounts of salt, that's about 1500mg. Do NOT take more than 2400mg. You'll want to drink water, too. If you can, buy yourself a little 52+ oz bottle to keep water in. Make it a goal to drink that entire amount everyday, throughout the day. Good luck, fat ass.

Don't eat or drink stuff that's notoriously unhealthy (coke, oreos) or do so with moderation, have a nice walk everyday for 40 minutes or so, follow this: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet and this https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/eat-the-rainbow#how-to-do-it I don't think that you have to be so strict when it comes to how much you eat, it's more about changing what you eat to less caloric and healthier stuff that will actually provide you better nutrition.

one trick I like the idea of is to just try to carefully track food consumption and calories. Ideally this adds a significant hassel onto eating things so you'll do it less.

>>34963 Don't count calories. It's not a thermodynamics problem and your body isn't a bunsen burner. Focus on food content. Something that containsa lot of magnesium, suppresses appetite, increases energy, and biases the body towards lipolysis and conversion of white to brown adipose like raw cacao may be helpful. >>34965 Definitely don't follow this advice. Most of the world is growing obese. Anyone listening to WHO or healthline is a fool. Instead, simply eliminate processed food to the extent possible. Cook from scratch. Eliminate grains in particular. Mild exercise, just get used to moving around more. This will happen naturally as your thyroid and adrenals come back online and insulin resistance drops, you're being poisoned by fructose probably. Buy distilled or filter your water, don't drink halogenated tap garbage. Literal poison. Get into that mindset. Don't meet in the middle. Don't be a mdoerate. Don't say a little bit of this littl;e bit of that it all evens out. No. Do it right. You're being poisoned. Stop eating poison. The other thing is destroy the myths within. For example the idea that to have good flavor food must be junk. That there is a trade you make. Offer up health as a sacrifice for pleasure. This is bullshit brainwashing from childhood. This is no such tradeoff.

>>34965 And by the way, I skimmed the WHO article and it says basically what you'd expect. Eat tons of glyphosate and atrazine sprayed grains, eat a bunch of cottonseed, soybean, and canola oil (unsaturated/polyunsaturated) and don't eat animal fats, butter, ghee, etc, or sources of saturated fat which are what your brain is amde out of and the very thing that TRIGGERS fat burning on absorption. No no, just eat fuarrrkin glyphosate and GMO soy / canola. Oh and don't eat salt! It'll give you high blood pressure (myth). Stop citing these cocksuckers. They're deeply compromised and have been since their Carnegie and Rockefeller inception, now dominated by Gates and his friends. They don't give a soykaf about you,. retard. They're an economic and population control front. It's abolut control, not your health. What is the matter with you. Shaking my head.

>>34968 >which are what your brain is made out of Rather what you body most easily turns intot he constituents your brain is primarily composed of (PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids)/ And then the plasma membrane has a certain ratio of omega-3, 6, 9 it prefers, and it depends on how easily a given fat is oxidized, and how it's stored, and so on. Saturated fat is far more durable. Unsaturated is going to be rancid, hot pressed to begin with, stored exposed to light, and thus oxidized and worthless. Saturated fat, not so much. Prefer literally anything to these hot pressed soykaf ass retard seed oils. Eat the rainbow? Give me a break. What a bunch of feel good nonsense. If someone's gut is fuarrrked already they may well be intolerant of FODMAPs and so on and their microbiome can't handle these things which is part of why they're obese. So be wary of fruit consumed without its fiber content in particular. Definitely no fruit juices. Whole foods and in season, that much I agree with. I ahte this soykaf. All these "experts" and all these bullshit front organizations saturating the world with soykaf advice that benefits their political and economic agendas, and everyone just goes along with it. And they have the dark triad psychopath soykafeater gall to dress it up in "eat the rainbow!" fuarrrk them. Eat my GMO soy and canola and cottonseed, and wheat and corn and rice, fat retard! We care about your health! Get vaccinated!

>>34968 Just to underline this: the head of who denied vaccines to people in his country because they have 2 tribes there and he said fuarrrk the rival tribe. Tells you how much the entire organization really cares about health care when they put something like that into leadership.

>>34968 You WILL eat ze procezzed waste oil and be happy. Seriously though OP should basically maximize fresh non-processed foods. Make sure to have a big portion of your calorie intake come from protein btw.

>>34967 Distilled water? Now that's bad advice. Just take mineral water. What evidence do you have that "grains bad"? Makes no sense.

>>34970 Vaccines are the core of the scam, Lain. They cause all the degenerative disease and dysfunction medicine steps in to permanently treat throughout the lifespan. They are market creating agents. They don't care about you, period. End of story. That's across the fuarrrkin' board and it's not like this soykaf hasn't been studied. They're known to be damaging and toxic as well as borderline worthless, in fact, harmful in areas that are malnourished. So much for magic jabby jab save the world, like a bunch of stupid little fuarrrking kids. >>34972 Uh, no. You get most of yopur minerals from food. NEither reverse osmosis nor distilled will appreciably leach out your electrolytes. That's a myth. If you have a proper RO system you should probably add them back in, but it won't harm you. I've personally drank it for months to no ill effect, and there's no mechanistic basis to suggest it's harmful either. Compared to tap water? Distilled. No question.

>>34973 >Vaccines If you don't believe in vaccines, how do you think the smallpox was controlled and afterwards eliminated? What about pretty much every statistic from every country in the world that attests that vaccines are effective? I'm not interested in changing your mind, I'm just genuinely curious about your reasoning on this.

>>34974 How was the black plague controlled? Why didn't it kill everyone? Pathogens have an odd self limiting characteristic, this has been noted many times throughout history. I know all the history and so on, not a conversation I'm willing to have for the 10 billionth time. Sorry. Responding to acknowledge having read your post.

>>34963 Start reading nutrition facts labels. Don't stop eating or start dieting because it doesn't work. You can't get permanent changes like that. You need to increase the amount you walk each day and perhaps start a new hobby (like swimming). Swimming is great because it trains your whole body and you can't break your legs or back if you listen to your body and stop and stake a break when it starts hurting. Stop eating junk food (limit it to 1 time per week maximum). Stop adding sugar to tea and coffee, and stop drinking juice and soda as much. You can replace them with tea or herbal tea (i like pepper mint herbal tea) and water (note, don't start drinking too much tea and coffee). Also, avoid wheat as much as you can (it's just plain calories but delicious). If you decide to take supplements, be sure to research them well before buying. Plus everything >>34964 -sama said.

>>34972 >What evidence do you have that "grains bad"? Different poster but I found this from my bookmarks but it's just 1 study... >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809873/

>>34978 justt adding from memory: when they started making hybrid sorts to maximize yield they ignored all other factors. One side effect was that allergens in modern wheat increased by ~5x. This is also likely why you didn't hear of wheat allergies before but nowadays plenty people popped up who cant eat bread. As a normal dude you might not suffer severe issues but any amount of inflammation is bad.

some of these subtleties are poorly understood, possibly vary person to person, race to race. OP just wants to loose weight, can't we focus on that and not whether or not wheat causes inflamation or milk gives you a stuffy nose ?

>>34980 There is nothing to add to that though, fix diet & exercise is all there is. The only thing you could add is dont think of fasting a bit and going back - you got fat with your current diet so you can't go back or you go fat again.

>>34980 >Can't we just focus on what emotionally pleases me, and not what I can do mental gymnastics to arbitrarily exclude by saying it's of far lesser importance?? No, slush box soykaf for brains. Refer to my first post. Don't be a retard.

>>34963 install gentoo you will burn all your calories just configuring

>>34963 The best advice you will get on the internet for losing weight is to under no circumstances use your microwave for any reason whatsoever. Everything else will follow from just that one thing. Ditch the microwave.

>>34994 This is actually sound advice. Stop making eating so easy for yourself. I usually only eat once a day. Food is also addictive, especially the soykaf you like the most. Literally a heroin addict asking how to stop using heroin. >But it hurts and makes me uncomfortable... There is one truth no fat person can escape: If you eat less calories then you use per day, you will lose weight. >Meanwhile, in America

>>34996 >There is one truth no fat person can escape: If you eat less calories then you use per day, you will lose weight. While this is largely true I think it depends on the person. For many people the deciding factor is genetics and it's largely immutable without medication. Like, I know someone who only eats one moderate meal a day and works out but he's still overweight.

>>34963 The easiest way to start out is to never let yourself eat more than two meals a day, which is to say pick an six-hour window and only eat during it (if real life things like a strictly scheduled job don't give you the time for two meals during a six hour window it's acceptable to make sure you consume nothing but water for at least an hour at the end and then extend the window for half of however long you went), and don't start until at least four hours after you wake up. It's even better if you can cut it in half to three; a lot of people report that so long as they avoid just sugar and carbs they physically cannot eat enough of anything they want to avoid losing weight in one mealtime. If you've got the willpower to also do a ketogenic diet that'd also be great for you, but pairing just cutting out sugars with only eating a moderate amout of food for two meals is probably the easiest way to get the first five pounds gone and get used to holding yourself back dietarily. I eat however much of whatever garbage my neurotic emotional state demands that day and never have issues with weight because I eat only one meal per day, and my previously obese father dropped something like thirty pounds at this point by just eating moderate portions of salads with meat, cheese, and avocado instead of dressing, and he's still going. Both can be done. Also I have no idea what "the jojo effect" is.

>>34998 >For many people the deciding factor is genetics This is indeed true. i had a gf some time ago, pretty athletic person, usually did around 4 hours a day of light excercise and an almost perfect diet yet still she had a hard time loosing weight she didn't wanted to have

>>34998 >>35001 Afaik gut flora has bigger impact. Gut bacteria changes how much energy you can extract out of the food you consume. And it alters also what food nets you most which means perfect diet depends on your gut flora. Still even if not everyone gets same result the general rule of less food less calories still applies. The variance in how much calories you get out of food just means you need to adjust and can't blindly imitate. Also note if you train and get muscle mass your base consumption goes up. So you can eat more staying slim if you get some muscle mass.

>genetics a major factor yeah this is true. I had a buddy who weighed about 275lb at a bit under 6 feet. He kept dieting and dieting, and just a very active guy in general. Once went on a week camping/hiking trip with him and seriously he didn't eat a bite but still managed to put on a little weight if anything. He says his dad was the same way till he died around 750 pounds after a six year fast.

>>35003 This is physically impossible. You're clearly jerking our chains.

>>34996 Again,. your body isn't a bunsen burner. It's not a thermodynamics problem. Calories in vs out, metabolically speaking, is so variable and vague that it's useless. Calorie counting is nonsense. I've never been overweight. You think that's because I count calories? Never in my life. Never will either. Just eat properly, the microbiome will stablize, your behavior and baseline movement will rework, and your body will no longer prefer white adipose. Your body takes care of the rest. God I fuarrrkING HATE calories in vs calories out. Stupidest bullshit I have ever heard!

>>35001 Your idea of a clean environment and diet is clearly incorrect. Not surprising given that most people slurp up fluoridated water and reference retards like the WHO as an authority on their health. What a joke!

>>35000 And if you want something even easier just don't eat breakfast. (Absolutely not replying to myself because I forgot to attach pic related)

>>34963 The most easy, braindead way I've found of doing it is to just eat one meal a day. As long as you're not eating exclusively sugary fried soykaf every day, you're guaranteed to lose weight as long as you don't cheat. Which is to say, no snacks (unless in rare emergency situations, like having to drive a car for 8 hours past the 20 hour mark since your last meal), and no soda. Tea helps, especially green tea. The warmth makes your stomach feel better, the tea has stuff that makes you feel less hunger, and the caffeine makes up for the tiredness until you get used to it. Downside being, it's hard to eat out with friends as it's either going to be hard schedule-wise (waiting 24 hours between meals is fine, waiting 36... not so much), or it's going to look ridiculous as you eat twice as much as everybody else. Pure licorice (as in, licorice root boiled down without any additives, like the Italians do) can also help, if you're used to sugar. It's sweet after you get used to it, but it doesn't have much in the way of calories and it's just a natural substance that's been used for centuries, not some research chemical that's gonna give you cancer.

>>34963 to take a different angle, I personally am motivated way more by what I want than by what I don't want. If you don't already have some athletic activity, find one you like. If you haven't been cooking good meals for yourself then pick some veg-heavy ones and get to it. Then you can imagine a future where you are a "runner" or whatever and a good cook, and you can choose it and look forward to it, and it will be rewarding to exercise and eat well instead of a chore

>>35007 Outside of what has been recognized by large govt orgs, there is substantial reason to incorporate genetics, locale and even the quality of the air you breathe. Consider even one small example here about inhaling your food (yes, literally!) Unless you think there is absolutely no nutrition in those little crusties that line your nose .. there's a large source of nutrition that goes overlooked all too often and its largely in the air you breathe. If you are the type of person to produce a lot of mucus that contains these microbes and yeasts and all sorts of goodies, you can guarantee you are ingesting up to 1000 calories extra per day just coughing up phlegm and mucus thats trapped these poor things and then swallowing it!

>>35022 I'm finally free of all of you. Thank you.

>>35027 Counting calories is for literal retards who think eating is like filling up their car's gas tank.

Arguably, more focus should be put into consuming complex carbs, and hdl. Less processed glucogens and more natural food

>>35034 I think way more attention should go into becoming and remaining fully vaccinated. That's all humans need for health. Vaccines. Everyone knows that.

>>35036 Dog I still have no idea why people are so resistant to vaccinations, they're vital to your survival

>>35038 Vaccinations are a proven scam to anyone who's done even cursory research and critical thinking. Something I would expect of lainchan users.

>>35041 Inoculations work. Bigpharma "science" pyramid scams and scams do not. To OP: put down the fork, otherwise get your thyroid checked. And for the love of Christ would it kill you to go outside for a walk every day?

>>35042 >Inoculations work. Wrong. >Bigpharma "science" pyramid scams and scams do not. They're the same thing, momo. If you want to think of it as a pyramid, vaccinations are a large portion of the base. That's why they do it. This split minded soykaf where you think they're helping me over here, they're feeding on and hurting me over there? Yeah, that's gotta go. Sorry bud.

>>35041 >>35042 >>35043 I don't know if the lain puffing copium image drove this point home guys, but to be clear I was being sarcastic. blindly trusting privately owned medical companies is ineffective and ill advised. Certain medical vaccinations are necessity, but not all, it's case to case, but I was criticizing a general blind faith in "Science" without any research behind it

>>35044 Lain the bulk of your vaccinations come from publicly owned pharmaceutical compaines. The entirety of the last few years was put on by publicly owned companies working hand in hand with yours and mine governments, where they passed around billions to each other... Are you purposely misdirecting people here or did you mis type something or do you just not have a big clue about the point youre making?

>>35045 publicly owned companies are the exception here, that's why I didn't diss them. These past few years have shown an exceptional improvement in the ratio of public to private medicine I agree My point, essentially, is that privatized medicine is bad- less so related to vaccines specifically

>>35044 >Certain medical vaccinations are necessity, but not all, it's case to case Nope, that's another part of the scam. Appealing to false rationality. Blanket reject. They're all garbage. I'd have to do more research, but the only thing resembling a biologic immune based intervention which may be necessary is for Rh incompatibilities in pregnancy. And that's absolutely it. The rest are poison.

>>35046 This is just fuarrrking gibberish. Public orprivate they're using the same system architected by the same medical-industrial complex. What in the absolute fuarrrk is wrong with you? This is weird soykaf like you're a child defending their parents. Just shut the fuarrrk up already.

>>35047 >blanket reject but I haven't done research That is just as unscientific as blanket endorsement. You're being no more skeptical or rational than the other lain.

>>35053 Nope. The baseline of skepticism should be the assumption of any unnatural signal pattern or stimuli causing harm. Naturalness is a heuristic, not a fallacy. And it's a damn good one.

>>35054 But there is a lot of evidence available, and I find it hard to believe that you have never seen any of it. So you're not reasoning a priori here, and such a heuristic would not be useful in this case.

>>35055 Yes, there is a large body of evidence both in mechanistic and epidemiological terms, that they, and the core assumptions the whole idea is based on, is flawed and useless at best, overtly harmful at worst. This informs such a priori notions.

>>35056 No, that's a posteriori reasoning. You're basically saying: you don't have any knowledge, so your heuristic will guide you. However there is plenty of knowledge available, so you're just deciding not to use it.

>>35057 I just stated otherwise. I've researched the matter.

>>35058 Then why didn't you just say so? Care to share the conclusions of your research?

>>35001 >>34998 The genetics has to do with how addictive your metabolism is(not personality) to certain lifestyles. Endomorphs, exctomorohs, all that soykaf is true, but if you eat less then you use, operating on a deficit, literal starvation, you will lose weight. >But the food doesn't taste good >But I'm hungry >But I don't feel full >But my blood sugar is low >But >But >But Genetics play a role in what your healthy weight is, and varies wildly person to person, but "calories" are a measure of heat energy. Denying In -> Out violates thermodynamics, and trust me, you aren't fat enough to break physics. And I want to clarify, there's nothing easy about winning over a heroin addiction, and fat does not mean lazy. If you want it, it might be 10x as hard for you as it is for me. But operating at a caloric deficit will force your body to lose weight, this is a fact, not for a day, not for a week. Permanently. You don't need to store energy in your body as fat cells if you own a refrigerator.

>>35059 Nope, not really. Spending the time or energy doesn't directly benefit me at all.

Yall I just got here but there is so much misinformation on this thread wtf

>>35069 Let me guess. Says the (former) fatty to the people who never have or will be fat. fuarrrk off, dillweed.

>>35070 nah i meant the vaccination bs Idgaf about your weight loss, bebop is a good anime tho

>>35073 Yes, vaccines are poison. Anyone who's done their research knows this,

>>35074 I'd love to see this research you're referring to so freely cmon, links go ahead

>>35075 The answer is no. I have a tendency to compile massive amounts of research, bibliographies, documents, all highly structured and cited, and when provided people refuse to read it and just make excuses. "This is gish gallop." "You're trying to overwhelm me." "Give me one single paper and we can talk about that." Not realizing I made the goddamn thing to avoid having to sink a bunch of time and energy into some random person. I started on thimerosal recently, got something half done. Just stopped bothering. Formation of immune complexes, highly nonlinear dose response of adjuvants. No. 10 whole years. Never got an ROI. Never will. Gotta accept that. You all tricked me, I was a moron.

>>35077 nah I want the resources, i mean it. Im interested in your claim, so I want you to prove me wrong and show me you're right here. please do

>>35078 My final answer is no. The world is not my problem anymore.

>>35080 we then arrive back at the fact that its bullshit. I rest my case lmao

>>35082 And then you wonder why. I rest my case.

>>35074 I have done my research and I don't know this. >then you didn't do your research That's not how this works

>>35085 Like Lain above, instead of replying to me you could just go to [search engine] and type "aluminum hydroxide nonlinear dose response". "adjuvant immune complex autoimmunity" "adjuvant vaccine molecular mimicry" "hepatitis B vaccine IL-4 inflammation" "immunocastration". Anything other than trying to go through me.

>>35073 lmao, immunizations =/= modern "vaccinations" Immunizations are 1200 years old and came about from people mixing body fluids from infected people and giving it to healthy people.

>>35080 >I won't (can't) do it but want to maintain the biggest-brain high ground regardless And you're surprised people are so dismissive of you everywhere you go?

>>35202 This is a genuinely retarded response. If you had a functioning theory of mind you'd automatically consider that what I did here is not the only thing I can or have done. Very quasi-autistic.

>>35090 Oh no, big words! I'm defeated! Oh wait, never mind, this was all either tangential or stuff I already knew. You could have spent less time trying to justify your ideas than trying to sound snarky and smart while not engaging intellectually.

>>35204 I have plainly stated I have no desire to engage with you unless you do equal or more of the work in the conversation. You'd better put something together, and it better be good. Otherwise, go away.

>>35205 >you'd better put together a long ass treatise to counter my claims, all of which I have produced absolutely nothing to support!

>>35214 Yes, that's right. I've done it. Now you will do it, or you will have nothing. Grow up, whiny little bitch.

>>35216 Now I have to do absolutely nothing and expect you to pull all the weight in the discussion? Gladly!

>>35217 You will make your case to me or you will have nothing.

>>35218 Also, to be clear, you might also end up with both. Having had made your case and still having nothing.

>>35218 >make your case to me My case is that I call bullshit on your claim "vaccines are poison". Show me what u got bubba! >you will have nothing idk I have friends and family, a girlfriend, and I have a sacred calling in life. I even have time in my day to fritter away trying to trigger sperglords on an obscure imageboard.

>>35220 Vaccines have three main pathways to yield downstream outcomes. -Direct effects of the component meant to have antibodies produced targeting it. -Direct effects of the adjuvant and excipients -Systemic, nonlocal effects via the immune system and overall reaction to the above. There are various mechanisms. -Microglial priming -Immunoexcitotoxicity -Immunogenic damage and other immune mediated functional changes (cytokines IL-4, IL-6, priming regions of the brain for a longstanding to permanent low grade inflammatory bias) -Nonlinear dose response to excipients or adjuvants (such as aluminum at micro and nanoparticle scales) -Synergistic action with other conditons and environmental pollutants, such as between nanometals and electromagnetic fields -A cascade of system failures, forming self sustaining pathologic feedback loops. eg direct autonomic damage or disruption of proprioceptive fibers leading to pinched nerves or circulatory problems and downstream a change in gut motility with eventual "leakiness". Experiments in mice show lesioning of the vagus nerve causes increased intestinal permeability in a matter of hours. This would cause a low grade chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, so forth. Supposedly "specific" and local effects need to be viewed within the bigger picture of the body as an interconnected whole. This is little different than recognizing the connection between the eyes and the legs, the heart and the brainstem. Why would it be different with the immune system? -Contaminants, insertion of genetic material (eg "magneto protein" expressing genes), nanotechnology, biomimetics, synthetic biology The failure that was forced vaccination in the 1800's should be noted as well. This cycle is playing out again practically word for word, step for step. It really is incredible actually. The first thing that should be stated is we don't actually know what's in the vaccines. You can go and look in the vaccine inserts, look in the CDC's pinkbook of vaccine excipients, or research manufacturing methods to try to predict potential contaminants from using peanut oil suspensions, chicken eggs, aborted fetal parts, HeLa cells, monkey kidney cells, dog kidney cells, and so forth (and consider this in the context of allergy). But, you still don't really know. Hence the SV40 contaminated polio vaccines, the Cutter incident which just happened to occur as work on weaponizing polio was going on at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. So forth. Nonlinear dose response of aluminum. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27908630 Neuroimmunology https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784951/ Immunoexcitotoxicity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609793/ Inflammation and neurogenesis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985767 Hepatitis B vaccine induced brain dysfunction. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27501128 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29751176 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627530 In the US this is given within 12 hours after birth. This aspect of our "Brave New World" should not be overlooked. You have the well reported alteration of antigen presentation in the gut, massive inflammation. That's against a background of other environmental factors which destroy proper gut flora. Section 13 of every vaccine insert, as its sole content, contains a variant of the following: "[Vaccine] has not been tested for mutagenic potential, carcinogenic potential, or impairment of fertility." Inserts are here: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states Purported vaccine content is here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf Robert F Kennedy (4 parts) Part 2 Vaccines https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqzNoZNpdxA Part 3 Vaccines and 5G https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9xJW0Lc2nI Part 4 Bill Gates and the WHO, Polio, population control https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3OAlkxcRQc Look up "immunocastration", anti-GnRH (eg Improvac). This has been used on pigs since the early 90's. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=immunocastration A variant of this (anti-HCg) was tested on girls in Kenya (by the UN) via tetanus toxoid which was "contaminated" with the beta subunit of HCg. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u The vast majority of vaccines are never subjected to a blinded randomized placebo controlled trial. They use other vaccines or adjuvants as placebos. The observation period is restrained to a narrow window. Long term followup is not performed. This sort of junk science would be called out anywhere else, but vaccination seems to be a protected class. The government body which is supposed to be monitoring VAERS and producing annual reports has never produced a single one. https://www.thelancet.com/article/S2352-3964(17)30046-4/fulltext https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868131/ Lazarus - Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system "Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. These data were presented at the 2009 AMIA conference. In addition, ESP:VAERS investigators participated on a panel to explore the perspective of clinicians, electronic health record (EHR) vendors, the pharmaceutical industry, and the FDA towards systems that use proactive, automated adverse event reporting. Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians’ usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting imbedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs. Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation." Vaccine manufacturers and administrating physicians were given blanket legal immunity over 30 years ago. Vaccines are thus a liability free product. You cannot sue for them vaccine damage, instead, you have to go through a lengthy process up against DOJ lawyers in a special vaccine court. If you win the settlement comes out of a pool allocated with a small fee per vaccine, not from the manufacturer responsible. In the event of overt injury, your tax dollars go to fund yourself fighting yourself, to pay yourself. DOJ Vaccine injury reports: https://search.hhs.gov/searchblox/hrsa/index.html?query=vaccine%20injury%20compensation%20DOJ&page=1&pagesize=10&sort=relevance&sortdir=desc&adsCname=hrsa&adsDisplay=true&cname=hrsa&default=AND&tune=true&tune.0=5&tune.1=3&tune.2=2&tune.3=5&tune.4=180&tune.5=10&x=0&y=0 Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): https://vaers.hhs.gov/ Flu shot has been shown to be largely ineffective, completely ineffective over 65. Wipond 2018 - Reporting flu vaccine science https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k15.full Historical data on disease rates indicates vaccines are introduced only after other measures have reduced rates of disease. Actual treatments and prevention have been suppressed in favor of vaccination, simply things like vitamin C and vitamin A for measles. Polio was successfully treated and partially reversed in its flaccid paralysis staged with injections of sodium ascorbate and a small amount of copper salicylate. Polio itself only became an issue after other vaccines, indicating immune disruption and inability to handle organochloride pesticide bombardment (DDT), diethylstilbestrol added to milk and used in pregnancy, mercury in the water from mining operations, people were putting mercurochrome on open wounds. Leaded gas. Even the wallpaper had DDT. A matter of total toxic load. Contamination with the old polio vaccine with SV40 gave many people cancer. Think about those in your family who are dying of cancer in their 40's to 60's. Historically vaccine contamination has been frequent. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472327 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404636/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2014.07.003 Notably some independent testing found various "contaminants" in human vaccines, but not veterinary. http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php Worth noting as well, prior to the "cutter incident" work was being done to weaponize polio at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

>>35221 part 2/4 Risk of severe side effects: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325 https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-04/pas-nrr042619.php Infection in fully vaccinated children, increased susceptibility to other infections after vaccination, role of the vaccinated as asymptomatic carriers or "resevoirs" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20200027 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378080/ Other resources: Look up Suzanne Humphries, MD. Some of her talks are on youtube. Her book "Dissolving Illusions" as well. John Bergman on Youtube. "Murder by Injection" by Eustace Mullins. For those who like to whine and complain about "conspiracy theory", he's simply compiling the contents of documents found in the Library of Congress. http://www.whale.to/vaccines/decline1.html http://whale.to/a/mcbean.html Quite a lot of information https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/handle/2123/20198/Rogers_T_thesis.pdf Vaccination is a primary component of a medical-industrial house of cards. "It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. But in his day this was an unattainable ideal: what he regarded as the best system in existence produced Karl Marx. In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. A totalitarian government with a scientific bent might do things that to us would seem horrifying. The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia, and were more inclined towards the sort of atrocities that I have in mind." -Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, 1952 Zbigniew Brzezinski - Between Two Ages, 1970 https://archive.org/details/pdfy-z5FBdAnrFME2m1U4/mode/2up Page 14: Social Explosion/Implosion "This new relationship is a tense one: man has still to define it conceptually and thereby render it comprehensible to himself. Our expanded global reality is simultaneously fragmenting and thrusting itself in upon us. The result of the coincident explosion and implosion is not only insecurity and tension but also an entirely novel perception of what many still call international affairs. Life seems to lack cohesion as environment rapidly alters and human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable. Everything seems more transitory and temporary: external reality more fluid than solid, the human being more synthetic than authentic. Even our senses perceive an entirely novel "reality"—one of our own making but nevertheless, in terms of our sensations, quite "real." * More important, there is already widespread concern about the possibility of biological and chemical tampering with what has until now been considered the immutable essence of man. Human conduct, some argue, can be predetermined and subjected to deliberate control. Man is increasingly acquiring the capacity to determine the sex of his children, to affect through drugs the extent of their intelligence, and to modify and control their personalities. Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, "I foresee the time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain."" Page 252: "Another threat, less overt but no less basic, confronts liberal democracy. More directly linked to the impact of technology, it involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits. The emergence of a large dominant party, alongside the more narrowly focused and more intensely doctrinaire groupings on the right and the left, could accelerate the trend toward such technological managerialism. Such a large dominant party would combine American society's quest for stability with its historical affinity for innovation. Relying on scientific growth to produce the means for dealing with social ills, it would tap the nation's intellectual talent for broad target planning and exploit the existence of doctrinaire groups by using them as social barometers and as sources of novel ideas. Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the steppingstones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society*. In different ways, both the doctrinarian and the conservative might find the temptations inherent in the new techniques of social control too difficult to resist. The inclination of the doctrinaire left to legitimize means by ends could lead them to justify more social control on the ground that it serves progress. The conservatives, preoccupied with public order and fascinated by modern gadgetry, would be tempted to use the new techniques as a response to unrest, since they would fail to recognize that social control is not the only way to deal with rapid social change. Such an outcome — were it to come to pass — would represent a profoundly pessimistic answer to the question whether American liberal democracy can assimilate and give philosophical meaning to the revolution it is undergoing. This matter not only has relevance for the United States; it has larger implications: American success or failure may provide a significant indication whether a modern democracy with highly educated citizens can successfully undergo an extensive social change without losing its essentially democratic character. Fortunately, the American transition also contains the potential for an American redemption. Misc: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497533/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsEIQzkcRZk Corbett report, Bill Gates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSvhPnUgyz8 I'd recommend the whole 4 part series.

>>35222 part 3/4 This is one of those "where do I start" matters. There is direct evidence, and several converging lines of supporting evidence. So we'll break it into two parts, first we'll establish that there is a major problem in general terms, then move on to evidence that vaccination is a primary contributing or core causal factor. US is 55th (1 being least) globally in infant mortality. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/infant-mortality-rate/country-comparison Variance by state https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm Chen et al 2016 - Why Is Infant Mortality Higher in the United States Than in Europe? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856058/ As of 2011's data 43% of children in the US have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions. 54% if we include obesity. Bethell et al 2011 - A National and State Profile of Leading Health Problems and Health Care Quality for US Children: Key Insurance Disparities and Across-State Variations https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21570014/ Pentagon data from 2017 estimates 71% of those 17-24 are physically, cognitively, or psychologically unfit for military service. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/the-looming-national-security-crisis-young-americans-unable-serve-the-military 32% Health Problems 27% Physical Fitness 25% Education 10% Criminality Rate of autism continues to rise. 1 in 59 males nationally. https://www.autismspeaks.org/science-news/cdc-increases-estimate-autisms-prevalence-15-percent-1-59-children The highest is 1 in 38 in New Jersey. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190411131538.htm Thorpe 2012 - The medicalization of chronic disease and costs. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224894 Selden 2019 - Decomposing changes in the growth of U.S. prescription drug use and expenditures, 1999-2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070264 Miller et al 2016 - Prevalence and Costs of Five Chronic Conditions in Children https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010981/ Perrin et al 2014 - The Rise In Chronic Conditions Among Infants, Children, And Youth Can Be Met With Continued Health System Innovations https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0832 "In 1960, 1.8 percent of children were reported to have a health condition severe enough to interfere with usual daily activities. In 2010, more than 8 percent of children had a health condition that interfered with daily activities—an increase of more than 400 percent in fifty years." "Publicly insured children have more chronic conditions than children who have private health insurance (24 percent versus 18 percent). Male children have 50 percent higher rates of chronic health conditions, as well as increased prevalence of asthma, autism spectrum disorders, physical disability, behavior or learning problems, and medical complexity, compared to female children." Whether "Can Be Met With Continued Health System Innovations" is the rational approach, I would say the statistics above indicate otherwise. The US has among the highest spending on health care of the industrialized world. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical https://www.crfb.org/papers/american-health-care-health-spending-and-federal-budget and yet our population is one of the sickest. highest expenditure, and most abysmal outcomes by all metrics. :: :: :: On to vaccination. General reference. Inserts: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states Schedule (US): https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html 68 - 72 doses of ~17 different vaccines by age 18. Check section 13 of any of the package inserts. "[Vaccine] has not been tested for mutagenic potential, carcinogenic potential, or impairment of fertility." In some vaccines there is alleged testing of female fertility. Given the association of ovarian cysts and premature ovarian failure in Gardasil however, that claim is dubious. The be https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm "Adhering to our complaints procedure, an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data. The article is therefore retracted. This retraction is approved by the Editor in Chief of the journal. >"The authors did not agree to this retraction." Immediately after: https://apnews.com/article/health-paul-thomas-portland-tetanus-oregon-48d917259b7985e6e335c67773507c62 Despite his having simply supported parents' choices on whether and how much to vaccinate for years prior (hence the existence of the large dataset in his practice). Worth noting: "All patients that were born into the practice between 1 June 2008 and 27 January 2019, with a first visit before 60 days of life and a last visit after 60 days." This is after the period where thimerosal was injected at birth (neonatal hepatitis B vaccine, starting ~1991) and also after the removal of thimerosal from most childhood vaccines (before age 2, except inactivated influenza in multi-dose vials) in 1999. This removes a potential confounder when simply aggregating all of the data (though one could always separate out certain subsets). However, a key factor in developmental outcomes of the earlier generations, and a key demographic (1991-1999), is not captured. I think the data here would probably be even more telling. Adjuvants: Dose response is often highly nonlinear, dependent on the individual, and several environmental and nutritional factors. -Thimerosal Starting with wikipedia. "Thiomersal (INN), or thimerosal (USAN, JAN), is an organomercury compound. It is a well-established antiseptic and antifungal agent. The pharmaceutical corporation Eli Lilly and Company gave thiomersal the trade name Merthiolate. It has been used as a preservative in vaccines, immunoglobulin preparations, skin test antigens, antivenins, ophthalmic and nasal products, and tattoo inks.[4] In spite of the scientific consensus that fears about its safety are unsubstantiated,[5][6][7][8] its use as a vaccine preservative has been called into question by anti-vaccination groups. Due to this public pressure the substance was phased out of routine childhood vaccines in the United States, the European Union, and a few other countries in response to popular fears.[9] It remains in use as a preservative for annual flu vaccines.[10]" However in the toxicology section further down the page: "Thiomersal is very toxic by inhalation, ingestion, and in contact with skin (EC hazard symbol T+), with a danger of cumulative effects. It is also very toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long-term adverse effects in aquatic environments (EC hazard symbol N).[22]" Citing Merck's MSDS in 22. https://web.archive.org/web/20090901160551/http://www.merck-chemicals.com/documents/sds/emd/int/en/8170/817043.pdf Shouldn't be inhaled, shouldn't get on your skin, shouldn't be ingested... yet injecting it into the muscle is supposedly fine. Mercury is also quite heavy, and it may tend to partially separate and settle nearer to the bottom of a multi-dose vial. This means delivered dose is highly variable. Lastly, childhood vaccinations are not aspirated. This is (perhaps) because the act of drawing back the plunger causes additional pain and can risk moving the needle anyway. Regardless, there is no guarantee they haven't hit a blood vessel, delivering some or all of the dose directly into the blood. http://web.archive.org/web/20030315125803if_/http://www.mercurypolicy.org:80/new/documents/WatersKrausPressRelease031702.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20070501114941/http://www.waterskraus.com/PracticeAreas/Thimerosal.asp https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/

>>35223 Part 4/4 Some posts by others: Lawsuit filed challenging legality of the defense department’s anthrax vaccination immunization program, This article does not go into the complaints from some service members that the anthrax vaccine made them sick in more detail but if you look into the history of Bioport the company that made the vaccine, you will find all types of suspicious soykaf going on like scandals & controversial federal bail-outs. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3691-2004Oct27.html https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-nov-25-na-vaccine25-story.html there are many lawsuits against Bill Gates foundations you can find them if you look for them,like testing vaccines without "consent" https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/controversial-vaccine-studies-why-is-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-under-fire-from-critics-in-india/articleshow/41280050.cms I am not saying that all vaccine & vaccine companies are evil but some of them are and have been involved in scams, you can find many if you look for them,Big-Pharma is not your friend ! & if you look into the companies that are working on the COV19 vaccine like Emergent Biosolutions! you should look at their history of profiteering, you look should at the people funding it , you look should at the corrupt people involved in lobbying for them in the government and then decide! if you want the government to force their products on the public by making vaccination mandatory. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 granted unprecedented, economic immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their products and eviscerated economic incentive for them to manufacture safe vaccine products or improve the safety of existing vaccine products. Congress therefore charged the Secretary of HHS with the explicit responsibility to assure vaccine safety but after a FOIA request HHS had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety. Safety was never a priority , making money and controlling the market is ,companies then go on to sell the products to governments worldwide https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Stipulated-Order-copy-1.pdf Vaccination: ALL https://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gpub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 Commentary--Controversies surrounding mercury in vaccines: autism denial as impediment to universal immunisation. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 Methodological issues and evidence of malfeasance in research purporting to show thimerosal in vaccines is safe. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 A comprehensive review of mercury provoked autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ Thimerosal Exposure and the Role of Sulfation Chemistry and Thiol Availability in Autism http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/ B-Lymphocytes from a Population of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Unaffected Siblings Exhibit Hypersensitivity to Thimerosal http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 Theoretical aspects of autism: causes--a review. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 Conjugate vaccines and autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 A prospective study of thimerosal-containing Rho(D)-immune globulin administration as a risk factor for autistic disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 The potential importance of steroids in the treatment of autistic spectrum disorders and other disorders involving mercury toxicity. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 Cultured lymphocytes from autistic children and non-autistic siblings up-regulate heat shock protein RNA in response to thimerosal challenge. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 A possible central mechanism in autism spectrum disorders, part 1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938 The role of mercury in the pathogenesis of autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947 Transcriptomic analyses of neurotoxic effects in mouse brain after intermittent neonatal administration of thimerosal. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092 Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568886 Aluminum and Vaccine Ingredients:What Do We Know? What Don’t We Know? https://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Lawrence-Palevsky/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder After 1979 https://academicjournals.org/article/article1411048618_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf UN Report On Vaccine Deaths / Dangers Buried By Google https://derezzed.video/watch?id=5e1e46e4240a6f001e6ce398 Why The Elite Do Not Vaccinate Their Children https://principia-scientific.org/why-the-elite-do-not-vaccinate-their-children/ Subtle DNA changes and the overuse of vaccines in autism http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ Vaccine and Autism- a New Scientific Review http://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/ Summary of previous Journal of Immunology http://danmurphydc.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AR-10-12-rata-AUTISM-VACCINE.pdf Autism and Resulting Medical Conditions: http://www.tacanow.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/autism-studies-april-2008.pdf. Mercury toxic encephalopathy manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 Relation of mercury to high autism rates in boys http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264412 Autism and mercury poisoning http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 Rise in autism coincides with rise in vaccines http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/A ----------------- Your dumbass can search the keywords I noted in: >>35090 and you might actually learn something. Get yourself out of the debate logic posturing oversocialized bullshit "muh skeptic" mentality. It's not "big words to defeat", I don't give a soykaf about you. You're useless to me or the cause of creating a better world until shown otherwise. I don't care about you at all and I certainly don't think in terms of defeating you, I don't even think about a "you" or a "me". These are things you are pointlessly and childishly introducing. Pull your head out of your ass.

>>35221 >>35222 >>35223 >>35223 >>35224 Thank you for your pasta! >The first thing that should be stated is we don't actually know what's in the vaccines We *don't* know or we *can't* know? In principle, it would be possible to come to a high degree of certainty of what's in a typical vial coming from a factory and why, would it not? Why do people focus so much on our lack of information rather than try to amend it? Surely there's millions of dollars of Mercer money floating around for anybody willing to take the job. http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php is the only study I've ever seen to this effect, and it seems that, like many things (food, water, air), they are contaminated with poisons, but aren't necessarily poisons themselves. >Hepatitis B vaccine induced brain dysfunction. >>Newborn C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with HBV or phosphate-buffered saline. HBV induced impaired behavioral performances and hippocampal long-term potentiation at 8 weeks (w) of age without influence at 4 or 12w It's a well-known problem that lab mice are different from humans. >The government body which is supposed to be monitoring VAERS and producing annual reports has never produced a single one. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/publications.html. You can also directly access VAERS data here https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html but of course, that's all lies anyway ;) >Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported Possibly because most of them aren't considered severe enough. I don't typically tell any government body when I get sick, unless it's bad enough that I have to go to the hospital. >Vaccine manufacturers and administrating physicians were given blanket legal immunity over 30 years ago. Vaccines are thus a liability free product. Indeed, this is something I am fully aware of and I think in itself is good reason not to trust a pharma company to produce vaccines. However, the claim that vaccines are poison does not necessarily follow from this fact. >Flu shot has been shown to be largely ineffective, completely ineffective over 65. Doesn't mean it's poisonous. >Polio itself only became an issue after other vaccine Bullshit. The polio epidemic was the worst in American history in 1952 and widespread vaccination didn't happen in the US until 1955. >Think about those in your family who are dying of cancer in their 40's to 60's Can't think of any, actually. >Risk of severe side effects: >Infection in fully vaccinated children, increased susceptibility to other infections after vaccination, role of the vaccinated as asymptomatic carriers or "resevoirs" All well-established, just as the fact that vaccination reduces overall rates of the infectious diseases they're designed to prevent is also well-established. Frankly, I think you just give the people at the top too much credit. >I don't care about you at all Aw, I'm hurt.

>>35225 >Thank you for your pasta! You're welcome. I wanted you to be aware you weren't even worth me navigating to my text file and copy pasting it. Your pestering finally outweighed it by a small margin. You're still not worth interacting with. None of you are. You're like animals, eternal children. >We *don't* know or we *can't* know? Both I'd say. Can't on a practical fundamental quality control level, don't on an organizational level or individual basis. It's just a mystery vial, that's it. A near solipsistic inheremnt uncertainty is the foundation for all skepticism, something the retarded eternal infants don't have the brains or balls to fully accept. I don't recall if I included these. Inserts: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states Pinkbook excipients. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf Schedule (US): https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html 68 - 72 doses of ~17 different vaccines by age 18. >However, the claim that vaccines are poison does not necessarily follow from this fact. Doesn't matter. You have limited access to information and therefore you cannot form a singular or coherent reality. Abandon the singular mind and linear thought. There are several models by which you can and would intentionally dose different batches with whatever, along with having them inherent disease inducing to begin with (long term degenerative disease due to metal deposits throughout the body and autoimmunity). >The polio epidemic was the worst in American history Caused by nervous system and immune system damage due to organochloride pesticide exposure, diethylstilbestrol, and mercury from various sources (eg mercurocrome). The polio virus is naturally present in feces and the feces of animals in particular. Total bullshit scam. Modern day corporate mythology. >Can't think of any, actually. I can think of many. >Frankly, I think you just give the people at the top too much credit. You're assuming everyone has your mind. No basis, and a lot of evidence against it.

>>35226 So you want me to adopt a completely new theory of mind just so I can have the enviable privilege of agreeing with you? >You're assuming everyone has your mind. No basis, and a lot of evidence against it. I'm well aware that my mind is very different from other peoples'. I've spent my entire life trying to figure them out well enough to interact with them.

>>35227 >So you want me to adopt a completely new theory of mind just so I can have the enviable privilege of agreeing with you? I don't care what you do. I want you to stop trying to become a coupled oscillator with me, and do your own thing internally. There is no we. I gave you what I gave you, how you deconstruct it and what you use it for is up to you. It has nothing to do with me and I want you to stop trying to merge me with your inner world and processes as though I am your inner manager. I don't know why you and others have retained this superfluous neotenous trait but it needs to stop. It's something you can[/i[ do with the right people, not something you [i]must do with everyone. >I've spent my entire life trying to figure them out well enough to interact with them. Yep. So have I. It's why I understand the basis and genesis of eg "conspiracism" and other topics better than everyone else. They're all braindead flailing children as far as I'm concerned. I am disgusted by them.

>>34963 Have you seen the TV show Alone anon? Why not go live in the forest and catch all the food you eat for a couple weeks? You will starve and suffer, but you will realize that losing weight is far easier than you currently believe. Living in modern society is coddling the hell out of all of us. Living in the forest will make you strong and lean.

>>35203 >Could someone be gently making fun of me? >No, must be QuAsI-autism. That's what makes sense, clearly. Allow me to guess, the vaccines did this to you, too?

>>35230 That's clearly not what was happening. I don't "play" to begin with, but if that's their idea of gently poking fun as some sort of gradual disarmament and cohesion ritual, they miscalculated and can fuarrrk off. I don't appreciate the attempt to begin with, and am not going to assume and play along with something so ridiculous.

>>35228 >I don't care what you do >I want you to X very nice. If you don't want me to have you as part of my inner world, then you should probably stop communicating with me. Communication tends to lead to empathy, and we can't have that!

>>35232 You're free to make a copy, my subconscious is organized to resist and make use of sympathetic magic. You just can't communicate in a way that attempts to directly incorporate the original. ie, you're tyring to outsource your mental functions to me, and I'm rejecrting it and telling you to take care of yourself and stop relying on others. Stop vampirizing, others, as well.

>>35233 If you recall, this entire chain of conversation came about from you saying "vaccines are poison. Anyone who's done their research knows this". I, who have done my research and did not know this, bristled due to the apparent disconnect between our realities. What research were you privy to, that I had never heard of? Turns out, basically nothing, with some falsehoods thrown in. This is what is known as disagreement. If you think I'm being parasitic by disagreeing with you, so be it, but I think you're wrong on that front too.

>>35234 Genuinely retarded reply. Pointless and hollow, AI-like, to be more specific.

>>35235 And yet, he keeps replying...

>>35237 Meaning what exactly? Show me the "gotcha".

op here, Im on a diet for over week now. I weigh 95,8kg now :3

So OP, have you lost any weight yet? I have been fasting since January (16:8, but its more like "minimum 16, maximum 8", so a sort of sliding scale.) I also significantly cut portion size gradually, introduced veggies gradually, and started eating occasional fatty fish. So far I have lost about 30 pounds.

none of you guys are gonna take my Alone recommendation seriously? just go live in the woods for a couple months and the fat will burn right off

Do a 70/30 workout split of strength training and cardio but keep your caloric intake at 2000 calories. Having muscle increases your resting caloric requirements which your body will gain from fat in order to power itself. Also make sure that you are hitting your recommended daily intakes of micronutrients, this will help you a lot in your weight loss journey, you can achieve this by eating lots of fruit and veggies, just make sure that you eat the plant fibre as well.

>>34974 Adding to the other Lainon, Smallpox was almost entirely eradicated by improved hygiene. The vaccination only came around at the absolute tail end of the decline. The effect it had was likely negligible. Perhaps it caused a final decline by adding just a tad more resistance, but I doubt it. The best a vaccine can do is provide short term resistance. The issue is that since they don't actually infect the body, the long term memory cells never remember the pathogens for long, and since vaccines are almost always given as a baby, your immune system gets handicapped badly from the get-go only to lose all of its short term minor resistance in a few years.

Don't eat breakfast, desperate for energy? Get any sugary fruit (dates are super fruits fr) and water. It'll take long, but won't make you feel any hunger, and most importantly don't eat and sleep directly.

Stop consuming sugar, eat one meal a day, go for walks, don't eat garbage, put yourself into a caloric deficit. If that doesn't work then you're probably genetically fuarrrked. Not fat btw, never been fat, no idea how you can become fat, I can't gain weight. If you're hungry instead of eating just deal with it, how can someone be an adult and say "I'm hungry" shut the fuarrrk up and deal with it, eat later.

>>37708 > how can someone be an adult and say "I'm hungry" shut the fuarrrk up and deal with it, eat later. This.

My advice would be at the same time go to the gym or incorporate other ways of weight training like callisthenics. Even after losing 30 kilos you still gonna look like soykaf and remain skinny fat or ugly skeleton or gonna have way too much loose skin. Cardio wont be enough, it even might be counterproductive since it might shrink your muscles. The truth is the only way to look nice is to get some muscles. And don't worry about becoming superbuff, people train for years for others to even notice they go to the gym. Muscle cells also use more energy than fat cells so gaining some muscle mass will increase your metabolism and make you able to lose weight quicker or eat more calories and dont get fatter. Strength training also prolongs your life, reduces your biological age, is good for your brain and there are countless other benefits. Looking nicer will also reduce your anxiety.

Here anon, have my diet Keep cals @ 1600 per day for loss 2750 for bulking

>>41761 >2750 for bulking buddy for a lot of people that's called stable, how much do you actually do ? this is much too personal a problem to perscribe specific numbers without knowing like how much the guy is doing or how tall he is or soykaf

>>35062 >>But my blood sugar is low I can put up with everything but this. Being on caloric deficit just feels so fuarrrking awful that I can't enjoy things, my vision gets narrower and it's near impossible to do any work. I think my body is fuarrrked somehow

Bumping this thread as I searched for a /fit/ related post and this was the only thing I found. Anyone has any recommendations on how to deal with microplasic load? Honestly I've been reading on some scientific literature and it bothers me how that stuff doesn't leave your body and most importantly, your brain. I hear certain vegetables, like cauliflower helps, thought I cannot recall exactly what vitamins or other specifically help with this process. I have also read that excessive cardio and sweating helps, thought that might be on the surface of your body, aka helping release microplastics absorbed via the skin. I am well aware this is might be a futile effort, but hey if I am to get dementia in my 50s instead of 40s I want to get to work as soon as possible.

>>44949 Actually in all seriousness, in the 6+ years I've been here I don't think I've seen a worse thread than this. My bad for bumping this.

>>41761 looks nice mate, what's your cutting diet look like?

>>44949 the only way to get it out is through getting blood taken out of it since it's circulating. I donate plasma, but you could also donate blood on top of that. That's pretty much the only way(s) I know of.