(untitled)

(((they))) have literally started aggressively monitoring imageboard posters not surprising seeing as how 4chan has been on the television many times it would attract this kind of attention if you post about this anywhere on the big boards you will be immediately assaulted by paid shills calling you PREDICTABLE with blanket responses like "take your meds" or "back off schizo". it's uncanny.

>(((they))) who, non-three letter agencies would like to know. but, in all seriousness it's been well documented already.

This is illogical in the same sense that Freud's theories are illogical. Any new evidence can be explained as conforming to the theory, even if it disproves the theory.

>>6312 >(((they))) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkIZqLDDHBA

>>6312 It's more like (((anyone))) with a vested interest, money, and a decent staffing department can influence anonymous imageboards. Everything is public and anonymous so a group of people behind an NDA can get away with a lot. But who specifically do you think is responsible for this and do you have any screenshots about these blanket responses? But anywas as an example of how easy it would be for people to do this, I used nltk and basc_py4chan to get all proper nouns in posts on /tv/ to see the popularity of certain people/concepts and possibly track wage slave frequency. The ultimate idea would be to take hourly samples and track the total amount of mentions on open threads over time. If I worked for an ad agency I could see the success of a product's advertisement if this metric goes up over time after ad campaigns. The specific code is problematic though since it doesn't normalize for individual posts, so one person posting "John Green John Green John Green" would throw off the results. Plus there's still some problems with tolkenizing the parts of speech. But if I'm just some scrub that can do this much in his spare time just think about the power a group of full-time guys with research/ad backgrounds who are fluent in with nltk, torch, kafka/spark, or whatever else they use nowadays. >>6313 Do you have an example of this documentation?

>>6313 Please post the documents. >>6338 Would be a kind of IB where you need to register the solution? It woudn't show your post nor the links, but it would show your number of posts and your date of registration. You could still infiltrate, but I think it could be harder. At least it would be more difficult for a group of paid shil-ls come just any day to soykafpost.

can confirm