lainchan / r

NK vs SK

Zero Cool · 2017-07-07 12:56
As you might have heard, recently North Korea has successfully test fired an ICBM and along with it came a whole soykafstorm of geopolitical nonsense. And while it isn't confirmed whether or not it has the ability to carry a nuclear warhead, judging from the speed of their development i'd say it is highly likely that those features would be complete during trump's term in office. So, everyone's been ignoring NK all this time but now that they have ICBM's, what do you think is going to happen? Will a war actually break out or will this crisis fizz out like usual?
Unsigned · 2017-07-07 13:08
nothing ever happens
Rhebus · 2017-07-07 13:13
World system in a nutshell.
Dr. X · 2017-07-25 01:50
North Korea, Cuba and the Islamic Republic of Iran are based and r e d pilled. Trump and USA and South Korea and Japan are globalists. Kim Jong Un always keeps it habbening.
Miho Iwakura · 2017-07-25 09:37
A NK-SK war would be a stalemate. Their border would make a land invasion complicated at best. NK doing a naval invasion of SK would be stopped by the US fleet. The USA bombing NK with conventional bombs would soften up NK but it would still become a war of attrition due to NKs military manpower. However, everyone is fed up with North Korea. I think that if the USA struck a deal with China and Russia to attack North Korea but to keep N. Korean lands outside american influence, all three could gang up on N. Korea. And then N. Korea would be fuarrrked. Anyways fuarrrk N. Korea for renouncing socialism and implementing their silly Juche or whatever.
Unspecified · 2017-07-25 15:28
NK won't do soykaf. China keeps them on a short leash, and the last thing China wants right now is a global war, which an NK attack would cause.
Special Agent Bob · 2017-07-25 17:00
>>4444 Behavioral analysists have concluded that Un is highly paranoid person that might press a kill switch in order to stay in power or at least as last fuarrrk you to the world Assasination would be best route Otherwise he can just nuke SK
Technician · 2017-07-28 09:41
>>4467 Yeah, the Kim Jong's are fuarrrked up. Power corrupts.
Cypher · 2017-07-29 10:04
>>4451 >a global war, which an NK attack would cause. How so? As far as I can tell, NK is almost universally despised. If NK attacks e.g. Japan, and they, SK and the US retaliates, I have a hard time seeing China or Russia doing anything to stop them. This thread has some very interesting (and well sourced) comments on the matter of dealing with NK https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/6o7deh/how_should_the_world_deal_with_north_korea/
Tyrell Wellick · 2017-08-05 05:59
>>3850 NK successfully testing nuclear-capable ICBM's actually made the world much safer. You know why Korea in the 1950's, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan, Saddam's Iraq, Qaddafi's Libya and Assad's Syria were subject to US aggression? Because none of them had nukes, none of them had the capability to retaliate against the US homeland. The USA only attacks countries which are incapable of effectively striking back. Now that North Korea has nuclear ICBM's, North Korea is effectively secure against US aggression. The probability of the USA initiating a catastrophic war against North Korea is astronomically low. https://gowans.wordpress.com/2017/07/05/the-real-reason-washington-is-worried-about-north-koreas-icbm-test/ Also, in general (on a global scale) nuclear weapons are an all-in or nothing proposition. In other words, in order to minimize the probability of nuclear weapons actually being used there are only two options. Option 1: No state possesses nuclear weapons. Option 2: All or as many states as possible possess nuclear weapons. Option 1 is a no go. Too late. Pandora's box has already been opened. Therefore, Option 2 is the way to go. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/waltz1.htm ANYways, north Korea is not the immediate target right now The real agenda of the globalist elite is global genocide. Global depopulation. Iran and Venezuela are key to this agenda. See >>4708 for more details
Incognito · 2017-08-05 13:43
>>4721 NK-US is a long way for a ICBM, it can be easily intercepted. The main problem would be targeting SK or Japan
Jens Hansen · 2017-08-05 18:35
>>4723 >thinking US "anti-missile/anti-ICBM" THAAD and other type interceptors are real and not just a pork barrel scam by Pentagon contractors for fat profits >thinking long range ICBM's can be intercepted getaloadofthisguycam.jpg
Bob Arctor · 2017-08-06 06:47
>>4723 nigga do you think it's THAT easy to intercept a fat ass ICBM? goy, those jews in hollywood really fuarrrked you up.
Marly Krushkhova · 2017-08-06 07:11
>>4732 it's not the jews who are behind the globalist World Order, anon It's the USA itself Specifically, it's the oil companies, the weapons industry and Christian Zionism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOcZQ0NKp4k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ioys1d6G4LM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJPCtSN2zLc Islamic Republic of Iran is the only big power against the World Order Agenda. Russia is fake, controlled opposition. China is fake, controlled opposition also. Islamic Republic of Iran, the anti-globalist, anti-World Order nation, has the oldest continuous Jewish community on the planet. Jews are protected in the Islamic Republic. So are Christians and others. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVueCIVta9o Khomeini taught us: Our enemy is not Jews. Our enemy is the Zionists. Zionists are political people and they are the enemies of all religions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWIqUknOxnE Imam Khomeini also correctly taught us that America is the Great Satan, the vehicle through which Satan enters the world. Israel is the Little Satan, the attack dog of the Great Satan and the Great Satan's useful tool to implement the Great Satanic agenda. Israel is a tool of America, not the other way around. https://gowans.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/the-bricmont-and-johnstone-faux-pas-wrongly-blaming-israel-for-us-policy-on-syria/ The final goal of the American project and the American hegemony is global de-population and mass global genocide. See >>4708 for more details on this evil agenda.
Faye Valentine · 2017-08-06 20:23
>>4735 >Russia is fake, controlled opposition. China is fake, controlled opposition also. Their nukes are fake too, right?
Leto Atreides I · 2017-08-07 00:39
>>4743 Their nukes are real, but irrelevant. Russia is not against the Satanic agenda. The Zionist entity bombs Syria over and over again. The Turks violate Syrian land over and over again. The Kurds cooperate with the USA to establish US military bases in northern Syria. Mercenary thugs enter Syria from Turkey over and over again. In all these cases, Russia does nothing. Only "words of protest" and "promises to install anti-air missile systems" or other, which never come to fruition. Russia is best friends with the Zionists. Russia is also a willing subordinate to the USA hegemony. Have you been in a coma since the 1980's? The Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore. Wake up.
Rick Deckard · 2017-08-12 22:53
>>4721 >Iran and Venezuela are key to this agenda. Trump just discussed the possibility of military intervention in Venezuela, which has been selling off its oil reserves to a Russian oil company. The governments involvement with perceived enemies of America makes this sound like the precursor to numerous proxy wars in the past >state A and B do not like each other >state C has problems >State A assists state C for some form of power gain >state B in retaliation engages in armed conflict against state C that is how he Vietnam war, soviet afghan war, and possibly the Arab spring were all conducted
Incognito · 2017-08-13 02:26
>>3850 oh wow ITT there are plebeians who see through the plot of a satanic zionist patrician elite who plans its agenda 10 years in advance feces I wasn't ready for such gnowledge what am I gonna do fugg
Netrunner · 2017-08-14 00:41
>>4735 S A T A N I C
Joey · 2017-08-14 14:30
>>4967 >which has been selling off its oil reserves to a Russian oil company Can they even process Ven's sour crude?
Lady Jessica · 2017-08-15 03:17
>>4967 I'm guessing that snake can't use emacs?
Bobby Newmark · 2017-08-16 05:13
>>4988 methinks they are just selling the rights, not the oil itself
Lady 3Jane.. · 2017-08-17 01:11
>>5033 That snek is T H I C C. :3