Moderation Abuse

It's become apparent to many users of this site that some of the moderation team are liberal ideologues who delete threads based on personal preference rather than adhering to the rules of the site. This has gone on for too long and it needs to stop. Things that have been deleted by the mods: >National Socialism >Age of cons3nt discussion (important in view of the Stallman soykafshow) >Corruption in academia (heavily populated by liberals who censor alternative views) Things that have conspicuously NOT been deleted by the mods: >Threads calling for the end of free speech >Threads supporting BLM terrorists who have beaten and murdered people for being the wrong color >Liberals posting threats to kill people for disagreeing with them (and having the audacity to call anybody else a fascist) >In general things that would get a right-winger's post deleted if they posted it Enough is enough. Some mods need to be removed at this point because they're going to kill the site if this keeps up. Nobody with even the barest hint of /cyb/ cred wants to post on a site where everything you say is curated by psychotic SJWs. If I wanted to post on /leftypol/ I'd go to fuarrrking /leftypol/.

>>>/hum/22481 fuarrrk off pedoshit

Look, you whiny little soykaf. >National Socialism So, plain unadulterated hatred, racism, genocidal idealization. Nothing of value was lost. >Ag3 of c0ns3nt So you want to fuarrrk little children? Again, nothing of value was lost. >Corruption in academia This thread is hilarious, and you're the OP for sure. You've been pushing this bullshit over many many posts, and we all know who you are. Look, if you want to make such a claim, provide proof. Actual, reliable and credible proof. Not difficult, I assure you. Again, that snake pit of idiocy and your extreme right-wing nuttery --- nothing of value was lost. Not deleted: >Threads calling for the end of free speech >Threads supporting BLM terrorists who have beaten and murdered people for being the wrong color >Liberals posting threats to kill people for disagreeing with them (and having the audacity to call anybody else a fascist) Cite your claims, cause I have yet to see any such threads. Sure people are free to argue these things, and some do, but to claim there's whole threads of these "evil leftists" (oh the horror, please make it stop) exist to stomp out your backwards rightist views is hilariously paranoid and retarded. >In general things that would get a right-winger's post deleted if they posted it It's true, Lainchan has a patented, 100% correct, never wrong, always right system of identifying people based on their political leanings and punishing those guilty of BadThink™. "Enough is enough. Some mods need to be promoted at this point because they're going to make the site better if this keeps up. Nobody with even the barest hint of /cyb/ cred wants to post on a site where everything is about demonizing people, delegitimizing carefully performed scientific endeavours, legitimizing nazism, and calling for ped0philia.If I wanted to post on /p0l/ I'd go to fuarrrking /p0l/. fuarrrk off back to 8kunt where you belong you lowlife piece of soykaf. >

>>8030 It's really not like that, and anyone who's actually spoken with the mods would know. There's not a concerted effort to censor "right-winger's posts". People can give their opinions on trannies, fascist governments, and other things without the posts being deleted, but the posts need to be relevant to the thread and phrased well. Political soykaf-spilling on either side tends to be deleted, and if someone thinks something should be deleted, it should be reported. I'm beginning to think /hum/ is the issue. It's got threads that probably would've been on /civ/, but people don't recognize this. I can't think of these issues on any other board, where usually any political opinion is off-topic unless it's intimately related to the board's real topic.

>>8030 >the moderation team are liberal ideologues who delete threads based on personal preference This mods do a good job. You're acting in bad faith. See >>8040 >>8031 You're not helping.

I would agree that some of the descisions the mods make lean to the left, but it doesn't seem overt or intentional. I chalk it up to the mods being human. No one is capable of being truly unbias all of the time. I think the mods gave your thread on /hum/ a fair shake, but it got derailed into being political soykaf flinging and pedo soykaf (largely because you couldn't contain your spaghetti). The thread had potential but it didn't play out well.

>literally running to /q/ because the mods won't let you talk about being a fascist and fuarrrking kids >when there are already fascist threads jesus christ you so fuarrrking pathetic sage for soykaf spilling

If it makes you feel you any better you stormglitterboys are gassed because you destroy discussion quality more than your "ideology"

>>8036 This post is an excellent example of everything wrong with the site right now. Everything you just said was a strawman. National Socialism does not mean genocide and most people who want to lower the consent age do not want little children to be legal, only for the laws to recognize that teens are not little children. >Look, if you want to make such a claim, provide proof. Actual, reliable and credible proof. The thread was chock full of mountains of proof from many different users until it was deleted, but no proof will ever be good enough for you. >stomp out your backwards rightist views So you're not even pretending that this isn't a partisan thing. If this is the kind of person praising your moderation, your moderation needs serious changes. >liberal poser opining about what makes people /cyb/ Funny how I believed all these years that being /cyb/ was about being anti-corporate, which would of course mean promoting views the corporate media dislikes such as lower ag3 of consent and National Socialism. Turns out it was actually all about agreeing with the corporate media and mainstream society unquestioningly. Boy, do I feel embarrassed. >>8048 The first thread was full of soykafflinging, almost all of which came from liberals including several death threats made by them for saying it should be permissible to question American ag3 of consent laws. Not even for actually saying they should be relaxed, not that it would be any more acceptable to make death threats for expression an opinion even if that was the case. But the second thread was actually rather civil and hardly mentioned anything related to that, and it was still deleted. If it was just about maintaining a civil discussion the remake of the thread would have been left up, but it's clearly about suppressing any skepticism of liberal dogma. >>8031 >>8049 Your statement implies that it's ok to talk about fascism, but censorship against those who want to lower the ag3 of consent is fine. This is not an acceptable position. People have different opinions than you and you need to get the fuarrrk over it. It's amazing that any of you have the gall to call anybody else whiny when the mere mention of lowering the consent age is enough to give you a seizure. Also, many threads about National Socialism were deleted before the mods finally relented.

>>8051 The thread in question wasn't about a 0 c but it seems that someone really wanted to push it in that direction. >Your statement implies that it's ok to talk about fascism, but censorship against those who want to lower the ag3 of consent is fine. This is not an acceptable position. Damn right, you get the bullet too.

>>8052 >actually having the gall to threaten murder on the mod support board

>>8051 >This post is an excellent example of everything wrong with the site right now. Do you really think >>8036 would be allowed anywhere but /q/?

>>8030 >>It's become apparent to many users of this site that some of the moderation team are liberal ideologues who delete threads based on personal preference rather than adhering to the rules of the site. This has gone on for too long and it needs to stop. Please provide evidence of what you are stating, because otherwise you are just imagining patterns that are not there. All of the things you are complaining about are /hum/ posts, and I am the primary staff member responsible for /hum/, not by my own choice (given the staff member that was going to moderate /hum/ previously resigned saying they couldn't deal with the toxic bullshit.) The reason some threads were deleted before others wasn't based on political ideology but rather to do with timezones of the posters and my timezone and my ability to moderate /hum/ in my supposed free time (it isn't free). I am not going to be removed, if you want to help with /hum/ moderation, then either volunteer to join the moderation team or report soykaf /hum/ posts in order their moderation prioritised or even better stop posting soykaf or astroturf threads in /hum/ in the first place.

test

>>8063 I'm not saying we need to let everybody act rude and turn the board into a soykafshow of vitriol and hate, as this would be very non-comfy. Unfortunately the board is already becoming this way, but the stormfront types aren't the people doing it. Every single person in this thread who has engaged in personal attacks is a self-admitted lefty who wants the views mentioned in the OP derezzed. They're are not only bringing down the discussion quality, they're stopping the discussion altogether. If the "careful endeavors" of the Official Academic Community (TM) were anything more than state propaganda, surely they'd be able to come up with something to convince people instead of shutting down discourse that runs contrary to their ideology. >>8089 >"why would you believe I'm politically biased gaiz" >in the next thread over is unironically posting that xkcd comic

>>8099 >They're are fuarrrk's sake. If I didn't have to edit every other fuarrrking post until it passes the stupid word filters this type of soykaf wouldn't happen.

>>8051 >which would of course mean promoting views the corporate media dislikes such as lower ag3 of consent and National Socialism. I've never seen such a smooth brain take, you don't have a single wrinkle on the thing do ya?

It's probably worth mentioning that there are insane people who spend their lives trying to post shock images on lainchan, and so lainchan has a large incentive to distance themselves from ag3 of consent discussions. Take a look at the ban list. >>8099 >I'm not saying we need to let everybody act rude and turn the board into a soykafshow of vitriol and hate, as this would be very non-comfy. Unfortunately the board is already becoming this way, but the stormfrnt types aren't the people doing it. All boards, except /q/, seem fine as of now. >Every single person in this thread who has engaged in personal attacks is a self-admitted lefty who wants the views mentioned in the OP derezzed. So? What does that mean? Does it mean the moderators are biased? No, it just means that there are less angry conservatives in this thread. Does it mean lainchan should ban lefties? No, the mods already ban all the butt mad people. The mods ban low quality posters who act in bad faith. This is the ideal situation. Conservative leaners have always been underrepresented on the internet. There's inevitably going to be some liberal zsoomer armchair warriors on here. When they stick their necks out of /q/, they get derezzed. >If the "careful endeavors" of the Official Academic Community (TM) were anything more than state propaganda, surely they'd be able to come up with something to convince people instead of shutting down discourse that runs contrary to their ideology. This is paranoid anti-intellectualism. Which is why it belongs here. We have a /diy/ board and a thread about getting a programming job without a degree. Most people in here are self teaching constantly. Furthermore, this is a board for malcontents annoyed with illegal, unethical, and immoral surveillance, tin foil hats. If you can't get a thread against academia stood up here, you are doing something wrong. I assume that you're blaming "liberals" for the failures of academia and making a huge stink about it. So long as you try to force a dichotomy between liberals and "real" people, you're going to get push back because nobody here wants to see that kind of tribalism.

>>8098 >>>/test/

>>8102 This is the kind of post that would earn a non-lefty poster a ban. >>8103 >calling out muh infallible academics on their shoddy research methods and blatant propaganda is against puppies and kittens and apple pie >>>/reddit/

>>8089 >I am the primary staff member responsible for /hum/, not by my own choice lmoa c_ck >Error say the word c_ck again, I dare you. Lmaooo like a little child nooooooooo you cant say mean words to me >posts nine gag memes defending censorship and anti freedom of speech on a "cyberpunk" anonymous imageboard >implies his userbase are shizophrenic imagining patterns that are not there Yeah I guess all of these folk just imagined their opinions massively getting deleted , it must all have been a dream. >chan with the most filters >only chan who bans users and deletes posts for single line replies Can you please just stop running this place ? You're an emberassment.

>>8106 noooooo you have to allow people to soykafpost, you can't just enforce your own rules noooooooo

>>8105 >This is the kind of post that would earn a non-lefty poster a ban. It would earn a ban or deletion anywhere except /q/. Nobody wants to see "lel smoothbrain" memes. >calling out muh infallible academics on their shoddy research methods and blatant propaganda is against puppies and kittens and apple pie That's not at all what was said. You seem to be having an emotional reaction. Please work on yourself instead of forcing strangers to deal with your mental problems.

>>8107

>>8109 >this lainon wants quality posts, what a fukken bootlicker lmao Get the fuarrrk off my internet.

>>8109 >every imageboard should be the same

>>8103 >large incentive to distance themselves from ag3 of consent discussions 8 had illegal content posted every day for 5 years and still let you talk about this. They only got shut down when shooters started posting manifestos there. >>8110 >quality posts means scrubbing every political view I don't like

>>8112 >I can't call the commies jews and the nazis retards in their respective threads

>>8112 Why the hell do you want lainchan to be more like 8chan?

>>8110 Lick harder boy

>>8111 You missed a spot

>>8109 >>8115 >>8116 >he has an actual folder of this stuff Anon, I...

>>8117 >what is one second google search The absolute bare minimum IQ of bootlicking cùcks

>>8120 https://www.lainchan.org/faq.html >Lainchan is lame. insertnamechan is better. >Either submit your constructive criticism in a /q/ thread, or go back to your favourite chan of choice.

The fact that most replies defending mod users just straight putting words in your mouth than debate over that bullshit shows how intelligent these bootlickers are. You're all new here and probably new to the imageboard culture in the first place , give it some time. When your constructive criticism and geniune well written opinions get mass deleted over and over again you will learn that all jannies and mods are massive glitterboys with absolute no exceptions. All Mods Are Bastards. Internet moderation is meaningless , you have the power to filter the content you don't want. You see something you don't like , hide it, delete it, filter it or simply ignore it. fuarrrk Mods , only good janny is a dead janny.

>>8123 >The fact that most replies defending mod users just straight putting words in your mouth than debate over that bullshit shows how intelligent these bootlickers are. "You're dumb" is not an argument. >You're all new here and probably new to the imageboard culture in the first place , give it some time New users calling new users, new users is not an argument either. > When your constructive criticism and geniune well written opinions get mass deleted over and over again you will learn that all jannies and mods are massive glitterboys with absolute no exceptions. I've yet to see any constructive and genuine criticism get deleted here. I only see people wanting to lower lainchan's posting standards because they want to post epic one liners and insult other people. Lainchan was never about that even when kalyx was around. >All Mods Are Bastards. >Internet moderation is meaningless , you have the power to filter the content you don't want. It's only meaningless if you want to have a community which is similar to 4chan/8chan. If you want higher post quality heavy moderation is needed, which is why lainchan is not soykaf in the first place. >You see something you don't like , hide it, delete it, filter it or simply ignore it. If you "ignore it" it will eventually become the norm where you have to filter 50% of threads because people will start to think that all imageboards are the same and that brewing soykaf is the norm. There's a reason why people are on Lainchan in the first place and it's not because they want to soykafpost. >fuarrrk Mods , only good janny is a dead janny. Epic memes, now post more frogs.

>>8126 >which is why lainchan is not soykaf in the first place. >lainchan >not shít AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAGHAHAHAHAHAYAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAA

>>8127 Go back

>>8128 Lmao and what was that about meme lingo and epic one liners you JUST said lmfaooooooooooo

>>8129 >doesn't know that /q/ is an exception nice arguments mr. wage slave

>>8130 You're being a hypocritical rėtard either way Also the fact you call me wage slave just shows how much of an actual rėtard you are In case you get this wrong which im sure you already did no im not a wage slave And yes , you are a rėtard.

>>8131 hahahahahaha do you even know that you're talking about a word filter? Shoo shoo newfriend

>>8132 b8d

>>8132 Doesn't make you any less of a hypocritical reetard.

>>8134 How come? /q/ has always been an exception, rules aren't heavily enforced here because it's a meta board. Every couple of months there's some new 'tard wanting to bring lainchan's post quality down because they think that the only way to have a successful imageboard is to have it be more like 4chan/8chan. You're essentially asking for the whole community to change because you think that the way Lainons have been interacting with one another thus far is wrong because you're new and refuse to assimilate. I still recommend going back, you'll probably never find the appeal of lainchan.

Testing retard to see what appears.

>>8136 Extremely confused by anon adding in ´s and modifying the word now.

>>8136 >>8137 He's really that new...

>>8135 >You're essentially asking for the whole community to change because you think that the way Lainons have been interacting with one another thus far is wrong because you're new and refuse to assimilate. Pretty much this. Reminds me of how people who never used lisp would go onto comp.lang.lisp to complain about how they wanted to use lisp but couldn't because it didn't meet their niche needs and the community needed to fix this. There's always some jack off who needs others to change for them and will attempt to scream until it happens.

>>8139 >>8135 Cognitive dissonance much? What >>8123 said has nothing to do what you two discussed about, the point is if you don't like the content you can delete it yourself Nobody is saying someone else should change the way they are except you two

>>8138 Quick question: If you hate it here so much, why are you here? If you don't like a place: You likely should not be there. >neurosuggesting his higher than lainons IQ But you are not even doing the most logical action: Which is to leave and not give something you hate attention. Do you believe that Lainchan is your social media account where you can just take a huge soykaf in the middle of the room and get mad at people for not appreciating it or ignoring it if they don't have anything nice to say? You genuinely do not belong here. It is not about "bootlicking" - which seems to be uttered by people who tend to do the most - but a desire for higher quality than our other options. That is Lainchan. Non-Lainchan alternatives: >LAWL POLOTIK! >LAWL LAMECHJAN BAD RITE GUYS >AYY LETS RAID LAMECHAN! >Lamechan not even real cyb. >lol I dumpster dived and found this cake and no one even ate it so I sold it back to the store and no that didnt happen but I still hate lainchan though. >yessssss we dont like that place >anyways guys, lets stop talking about lainchan for a moment. Lets learn how to do X. >LOL lainchan cant even do X. etc. etc. Lainchan: >actual discussion >2 or 3 nonfat-soykaf drinkers who tend to dealt with quickly >not even thinking about you unless its forced to

>>8143 Responded to the wrong person. Whatever you know who I am asking.

>>8142 I wonder who could be behind this post.

>>8145 Not me idk why you replied to me

>>8147 Sure it's not, go back to your desired chan of choice newfriend if you dislike lainchan so much.

>>8148 You're being delusional, that literally is not me.

>>8142 >the point is if you don't like the content you can delete it yourself I could, but instead I choose to visit a website where the moderators kill bad replies for me. This saves me time and means that everyone who's part of the conversation sees the same replies. If you don't like it, you can go somewhere else or make your own place. You won't though because you know the community won't follow you, so you stick around to annoy people. Fun tip, people stay here *because* of the moderation. >Nobody is saying someone else should change the way they are except you two You want to change the rules of an existing community. You're an entitled noob.

>>8131

>>8151 kek

>>8145 >all this just to make a arisu 2.0

>>8114 I'd prefer to have similar freedom of discussion without the toxicity of a typical imageboard. 8 actually achieved something close to this in its early days before the Trump phenomenon and Q retardation brought in a bunch of dipshits. >>8150 The people who want the moderation to change are the original users. Those who are comfortable with it as it is now are invaders from SJW-infested places like /leftypol/ and hackernews who came here after the Stallman fiasco to shut it down because a luminary like him disagreeing with the status quo on ag3 of cons3nt was making people reconsider and the femistasi couldn't have that. His obviously coerced and non-genuine sudden recantation only piled more evidence in the favor of the dissidents.

>>8154 >I'd prefer to have similar freedom of discussion without the toxicity of a typical imageboard. If you think such a thing can exist, go create it. By your own admission, it didn't seem to work out very well for 8chan, but good luck. >>8154 >The people who want the moderation to change are the original users. No they aren't. We know this. There were almost no free speech complaints for the last couple years despite the rules being the same and being enforced the same. It's far more likely that new people are complaining rather than old people just changing their minds. >came here after the stallman fiasco to shut it down Really? Because I remember the Stallman threads being very supportive of Stallman and seeing these links throughout them. http://verisimilitudes.net/2019-09-17 https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ There were some morons trying to turn this into a discussion about whether or not Stallman's views on sex are correct, which is of course completely irrelevant and missing the point. Notice that I didn't specify whether they agreed with or disagreed with Stallman. It doesn't matter. >femistasi When you throw in stuff like this, you mark yourself as an outsider acting in bad faith. Nobody wants to talk to someone who wears irrelevant politics on their sleeve 24/7. That's been a faux pas here for years. That's why the problems in academia thread got shutdown. You are acting in incredibly bad faith. You're obviously new, you're trying to change existing rules you don't follow, you drag unrelated politics into every discussion, and you knowingly lied about only new people wanting the rules to stay the same as they've been for several years. At the same time, you're a worthless hanger on obsessed with staying where you're not wanted. You're a loser.

>>8156 You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. People have always complained about moderation on this soykafhole. How new are you ?

>>8156 >There were almost no free speech complaints The free speech complaints we've had of late are partly from posters who believe there's too much of it here. This wasn't a thing until Stallman's problems started. That tells us who the actual interlopers are. >When you throw in stuff like this, you mark yourself as an outsider acting in bad faith. This entire part of your post is you projecting like a fuarrrking holodeck. >>8157 People always complain about the moderation on every site. But it's only relatively recently that it's gotten bad enough that there are at least 5 threads here specifically complaining about the moderation and not other unrelated site issues.

>>8157 >being this much of a new user lurk moar

>>8164 >If you think that lain"chan" is a successful place, you are very wrong, the post per hour here is horrible, the filters are ultra fuarrrked up. The post speed isn't that bad. How many do you think we get per day? The filers are fuarrrking awesome, and if you don't like it: Leave, lmao. Just close your browser.

>>8166 Why did they delete it wtf?

>>8169 >same users to advertise >wonders why the post was deleted.

>>8170 He just asked it, are you guys afraid of what? Losing users? Wtf i cant understand

>>8171 You don't understand? You're larping as several users in this thread. I don't care about "losing users", the people who would go to your soykafty 8ch clone can stay there lmao

>>8172 What the fuarrrk, schizo fuarrrks.

>>8173 Well, you never changed your ip address.

>>8176 Maybe im getting crazy, or you guys are making me crazy?

Also fuarrrk ipv6

>>8163 Go back. :)

>>8172 Take your meds and lay off HRT

>>8051 Among the first posts and nothing has changed , trannies keep sucking mods dicks , users keep on strawmanning

Imagine licking the boot and defending it on a cyberPUNK anonymous imageboard. Really gets my noggers joggin This entire place suffers from cognitive dissonance

>>8182 Clown world

>>8182 Imagine being a Brazillian nigger tranny attempting to raid an imageboard with your discord insider trade which consists of literally whos.

Nah. Anyone to the left of Adolph Hitler looks like a "liberal ideologue' to some of you guys. If the mods here like to limit the more toxic horseshit, that's fi e with most of us.

>>8189 And being to the right of Karl Marx makes you Hitler according to you. Somehow I doubt you'd be singing the same tune if your posts were being deleted.

>>8189 >>8196 lol dejavu? I swear these two posts have already been made on lainchan a couple of months ago.

>>8197 Maybe these two are trapped inside a cycle of making this argument or maybe it's the same person????

>>8198 The way both of them phrased their sentences is making me believe that they're trapped inside a cycle.

This thread is beautiful

>>8030 Lainchan is Reddit - the imageboard, what did you expect?

>>8436 >>8121

From what I have observed all threads have been given fair chance, even when they are created with horribly written OPs. It is only when they devolve into soykaf flinging and/or schizo posting that they get deleted. I have no problems with the current state of moderation on the site. It's fine for this site to have a culture distinct from that of 8chan boards or 4chans /b/ and /tv/.

>>8438 it would be nice if the mods actually did their jobs and modded. There's a very active pedophilia thread going on, and the pedos are all like "we're not discussing pedophilia you sucker, you mental midget, you retarded little fuarrrk". The only function that topic serves is to normalize pedophilia. Oh look, we're just like you! Seriously, lainchan's standards have dropped so so so far.

>>8439 There is nothing wrong with discussing pedophilia. This hate leads to repression. Pedos left alone, who cannot discuss their problem with anyone (because they are afraid their live will be ruined) are more likely to act according to their urges

>>8440 Nice. Pedophilia apologist framing pedophilia as needing help. They need to be killed.

>>8440 Such discussion has no place on lainchan.

>>8440 There's something else it can lead to, which is violent retaliation against the society that oppresses them. >>8441 And what if they decide YOU need to be killed? With this kind of talk, they have nothing to lose by going full Elliot Rodger. >>8442 fuarrrk outta here redditnigger. You have no place here or on any other imageboard. Your kind is an abomination.

>>8439 I don't think that pedophilia is the same as lolicon and I'm pretty sure that I saw at least 3 pedo threads get locked/deleted recently. >>8443 >fuarrrk outta here redditnigger. "Ah yes, a community which is predominantly interested in tech. I know what they need, pedophilia!" You're either a state actor or a pedophile, neither is welcomed here. >You have no place here or on any other imageboard. YOU have no place here retard.

>>8444 Take a pill schizo, your unreasonable hate for people that feel sexual attraction to "underage" (which is natural) is a symptom of problem with our society, and cyberpunk imageboard should be all for discussing problems

>>8151 >actually a banner LMAO

>>8151 hahahahahahahahaha

yikes guys... what's with all the pedos?

>>8456 There is nothing wrong with underage attraction.

>>8456 They keep seething because their threads are getting deleted. Like all parasites they're clinging onto a host, in this case the host is a community which cares about privacy/security because they need anonymity for nefarious reasons. They'll either go away because they're being silenced or they'll keep moaning about it on /q/, which is funny because from what I've seen mods rarely reply to their threads. For some reason they believe they can talk about their perverse fetishes on here because they can freely do so on other imageboards.

>>8459 Don't look now, but they made a lolicon thread to normalize pedophilia. They're all "oh it isn't a debate", but rather it just normalizes this disgusting soykaf,

>>8461 I don't think that's the same person nor do I believe that lolicon is same as pedophilia, though yeah fapping to 2D children might be an indicator that something is wrong with you.

>>8462 lolicon definitely is the same as child porn. It's baked right into the fuarrrking word. https://www.definitions.net/definition/lolicon https://www.wordnik.com/words/lolicon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon nice try. This whole lolicon thread is a motte and bailey. Promote and defend pedophilia, then retreat to "oh no, it's just pictures, see?" It's a disgusting abuse of lainchan's rules. The mods need to get their soykaf together and terminate that filth.

I'm reporting this thread. This is really gross lainchan, and I'm really surprised it's being allowed. >>>/hum/29932 >For the sake of discussion, let's assume lolicon imagery doesn't hurt anyone Bad faith. You're defining something as not causing harm when that is not actually the case. If you want to make the claim, you better be able to back it up with hard facts. Pretending that there is no harm "for the sake of discussion" is a disgusting falsehood. >and it's not going to translate in any way to irl abuse. Back it up. You're claiming that even pedophiles don't abuse when they look at this media. This is provably false. Lolicon can and certainly does lead to irl abuse. >I'm curious how you view yourself, how you view your interests, and how you view yourself and your interests as they relate to broader society. the only valid response is: >fuarrrking little kids >Despite lolicon being fictional and harmless to others, do you think there's anything wrong with being interested in loli material? Do you feel shame? false again. "fictional" and "harmless" are not possible to conjoin. Again, this is bad faith, you're advancing a conclusion which assumes the premise is true - it is not. This is a logical fallacy. You obviously know this given your careful choice of words --- Therefor you're acting in bad faith. The only function of this thread is to make pedophiles look "less evil" and even "acceptable" because they have "alternative outlets". It's a fuarrrking lie and a trojan horse. Don't be a retard, shut these sick fuarrrks down.

lol the retards who run this site are allowing pedophiles to run rampant. sad, and very pathetic.

>>8465 fuarrrk off pedophiles are not necessary bad

There is nothing wrong with communism. fuarrrk capitalism

>>8456 >>8465 >yikes >gross

>>8584 ok pedo

>>8466 Lol this retard cant hide pedo threads by himself Lmao how can someone be THIS retarded

>i dont like a thing so i need jannies to ruin the fun for everyone else Imagine being this much of a bootlicking baby glitterboy

>>8030 >Fashie is also a paedophile Every time

>>8465 This post makes me want to rape a child, strangle a r04stie and set a f4gg07 on fire.