Fucking Nazis.

The "self improvement" thread is a wage slave thread for pushing Natsoc bullsoykaf. They're being ever so polite about it, but it's a propaganda thread. https://lainchan.org/hum/res/12708.html

>>6193 I am not a nationalist socialist and I would appreciate it if you did not refer to me as such. I already said just ignore the political garbage if you are upset by it or anything of that sort. I spoilered them. I made them as inaccessible as can be to anyone who may be sensitive to the imagry, while still being available for lains that can look past it. If you would prefer, you can modify the mages and repost them without political persuasions and I will gladly delete the ones that contain them. The only reason I didn't edit them is because it's more effort than it's worth, the thought never crossed my mind, and I don't care much for trying to censor another person's creations, regardless of how they think their country should be ran.

>>6194 I don't see how it is a wage slave thread. Even if the spoilered contents were deleted, there is nothing about self improvement that is actually related to national socialism and national socialism isn't the same Nazi or being a fuarrrking Nazi. As per the byline of lainchan's News page News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising.

S H I L L filters to "wage slave", Appleman. And this is how Nazis (and pedos) operate, inserting their filth into every subject until it's normalised or someone shuts them down. This isn't the first time they've tried to make inroads at Lain, and they have a history of trying to hijack the Cyberpunk aesthetic. You have to draw a line in the sand or they'll keep coming until they dominate every discourse, using "freedom of speech" and "democracy" arguments until they can take ours.

>>6196 I am aware of the language enhancers. Also you the person you are accusing of being a fuarrrking nazi wage slave isn't, and I get your general point, but in this particular case you have incorrectly jumped the gun. Do I need to remind you of Rule 3 and Rule 4, because your OP doesn't elaborate and it isn't in good faith ?

>>6197 Nazi = Nationalsozialismus = National Socialism. Same difference. If he isn't, why insert a reading list of Natsoc lit? It's just slipping their agenda into a thread, hoping we won't taste the inform in the meatball. And how much good faith am I supposed to have in a dialogue with obvious goosesteppers in an obvious propaganda thread? It isn't even very subtle, they're just depending on your tolerance and your own rules to make it socially awkward to confront or moderate them. It's... passive-aggressive sealioning. Do I gotta bring up Karl Popper's paradox of tolerance? You're suspiciously tolerant yourself of the incursion, Apple. Mind elucidating on your politics?

>>6197 not the same lainon as >>6196 if you get the general point, then you should understand that these fuarrrks *only* push their propaganda in innocuous ways which "follow the rules"

R E D P I L L filters to "inform"? Welly welly welly well. I see who's running Lain now.

>>6199 Except the OP of that thread isn't one of these fuarrks , you are incorrectly ascribing malice over ignorance. >>6198 >>6200 You are incorrectly ascribing malice over ignorance. You are supposed to have good faith regardless of whether you interpret the actors as being good or bad actors. The fact that you are asking about my political beliefs in a /q/ thread, indicates to me that you are just yet another side of the same coin as the people you complain about e.g. your complaint of this specific instance is a known false positive and your attitude in response indicates your are pushing some propaganda of your own. But fine have your cake (the thread has been deleted, because of it being derailed).

>>6193 even if it's true why should we do anything about it?

>>6201 How do you know the OP's intentions? Are you going by his statements, or do you have some insight into his motivations?

>>6193 There is literally nothing wrong with national socialism.

>>6205 this

>>6201 refer to: >>6205 You will never get a Natsoc thread where people openly support it outside internal networks. That is literally the point of signaling and has been for decades. It's up to you to decide if this is something that should be a bannable offense or not, but to claim ignorance from your part is absurd.

>wage slave this site on /g/ and /tech/ >then wonder why there are so many nazis IMAGINE MY SHAWK