(untitled)

What is the general Lainon opinion on LGBT people I'm bisexual and I'm curious to know if this place is any less toxic towards queers than other chans

>>13549 Don't ask don't tell. But not in a bad way. I simply do not care what floats your boat. It has nothing to do with Lain or Lain adjacent stuff.

>>13550 Understandable for sure

>>13549 Be what you are freely. We are nothing but our brains connecting to other brains through flesh we are forced into by chance.

I like calling people fagg0ts but I couldn't be bothered about homosexuals, it goes for basically every slur that I use. Sissies are annoying as fuarrrk though.

Can't say I've felt accepted here but its still way better here than most image boards. Been here for a decade and not gonna leave just because some refugees dont like that I'm a tranny glitterboy.

I am totally ok and even excited to talk to people of non-standard orientations but I don't like the social movements based on these identities. Gays are ok, pride and all the political shows and fanfare around them is not. Society shouldn't care about what's happening in my bed, neither should I bring my bed out into society.

>>13549 I speak for myself only. I don't like homo gays but I don't mind bisexuals or trans. I'm probably bisexual myself but I'm not interested in sex. Form what I've seen around most chans, there's a lot of anti-trans stuff floating around for sure. Unfortunate, but that is how it is. Now a lot of people will have this "I don't care what floats your boat, it has nothing to do with us etc" but this means you can't just talk about regular stuff without being accused of bringing your private identity out or forcing stuff e. g. let's say a bisexual guy makes a post about being rejected by his hetero or glitterboy crush, then some people might accuse that guy saying "ohhh why are you bringing identity into this, don't discuss that stuff blah blah blah" when a guy ranting about his gf won't provoke such a response. I think discuss what you want to discuss openly and there's no shame in that. I don't like movements based on sexual orientations. Not because there aren't serious social and political problems (see what I said above as an example of soft discrimination), but because those movements tend to be rigid hiveminds that create more conflict than dialogue and everything winds up polarized.

orientation is irrelevant all that matters is your behavior. Don't indulge anything deviant and I don't care.

>>13549 Homosexualists spread diseases like aids and monkeypox, and frequently rape children. Transsexualists destroy the fabric of society and language by demanding to be treated and referred to as women when they are clearly men.

>>13582 -ual is the suffix, you just added 2 suffixes to transsex and homosex you retarded ESL >inb4 avoiding the point You would've been regarded as psychotic in most formal political arguments. only retards like drumpf would actually take you seriously.

>>13584 Homosexual is a neutral adjective. It could imply they are like that from nature, which is a common misconception that needs to be debunked. Homosexualist specifically means people who engage in homosexualism willingly. It's an older, more accurate term.

>>13582 And whites are more likely to be pedophiles and school shooters Does that mean whites don't deserve rights?

>>13588 That's right. Unless you're white, in which case that's wrong. There is no universal morality. Just different species, nations, ethnicities, religions competing on the planet for limited resources.