Uncalled ban, irritating warning

The Solarpunk topic on /hum/ went through its second thread rather peacefully and was very productive >>85465 It ran for months without a single issue and nobody complained until a mod recently visited it and decided to plaster a >(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST, You should always elaborate on your opinions rather than just spilling the soykaf.) on the OP and that's just a few days old. I know this because I have copies of the thread. That was totally unjustified! Now it makes the thread looks like crap. Could someone remove that warning/tag please, it soils the thread, and could some charitable soul perhaps explain what went on?

>>13124 I don't see any uncalled BAN. I don't even know if I can remove a warning, but the warning was justified. The original thread received multiple reports and complaints, and the subsequent thread also received multiple reports. The opening post doesn't elaborate on what the actual discussion was and is supposed to be about, and is a Rule 4 violation. Nevermind that you have multiple people claiming to be OP and others trying to wage slave their businesses.

i have already said this in the past, whoever keeps putting this dumbass warning everywhere is ruining the browsing experience of the users. people will ask questions and some mouthbreather will warn them that they need to "elaborate". elaborate on what? they literally dont know, that's the entire point of the thread.

>>13129 >I don't see any uncalled BAN. >I don't even know if I can remove a warning, but the warning was justified. None of this could ever be justified. Have you even looked at the thread? It's one of the most informative and detailed threads I've read in ages in this forsaken place. >The original thread received multiple reports and complaints, and the subsequent thread also received multiple reports. You can't be serious. What did the reports contain really? If there was any issue it should have warranted a constructive message to explain what some people complained about and what should be changed within the thread. But really, who would even report that kind of thread? Party crashers? Pissant people? Seething Schwaboons? The second iteration of the thread literally went on for months before the warning+ban fell lately. That's fuarrrken bullshìt. The jannie didn't even bother reading them, clearly.

>>13134 Notice that this poster never received a satisfactory answer on what those reports contained.

retarded janny falls for mass reporting by mossad trannies