what /

where would one post to request info about nsfw material?

This is something important because I had been closely monitoring NSFW blocks and bans from sites, see https://lainchan.org/r/res/39406.html I don't know whereabouts on the imageboard could help you on it, however.

>>12939 Sorry but where's the OP image? Mods, is this a rule breach that hadn't been pointed out yet? This isn't right.

>>12947 Image was deleted due to Do not spam or advertise unrelated content. Do not post child pornography or questionable 2D/3DCG/3DPG sexual depictions of children. This includes "child models". If you must post it, spoiler any NSFW content and make sure it's relevant to the discussion. violations. Mainly Rule 7 and Rule 9, but also the potential of other people arguing Rule 8 under the definition of questionable.

>>12948 The image in question was mostly cropped and a couple of words were censored, believing me that it was compliant to rule #9; "... spoiler any NSFW content and make sure it's relevant to the discussion". I disagree on the "don't spam or advertise unrelated content" rule (rule #7) for a few reasons. Firstly, the image seems to address a pointer to OP's question, "Where would one post to request info about NSFW material?" Secondly, that springs to mind it shouldn't be spam if it's relevant to the question OP has asked, primarily speaking when I had been closely monitoring NSFW blocks and bans from sites via /r/, so if a person were to request info about the accessibility of NSFW material on here, why would breaching rule #7 be necessary? Rule #8, "Do not post child pornography or questionable 2D/3DCG/3DPG sexual depictions of children. This includes "child models"" doesn't fit into place, and the potential of other people arguing rule #8 under the definition of questionable when the image clearly says "teen" in the text; not CP in general. Simply put, the OP there asked us about NSFW post requests but... >"Mainly Rule 7 and Rule 9, but also the potential of other people arguing Rule 8 under the definition of questionable" ... doesn't feel correct. I had been closely monitoring NSFW blocks and bans from sites, and as Sage stated that >"... these kinds of login walls are used even for the most benign of things like just accessing a website... the measure shouldn't be a thing in the first place... this is not an acceptable tradeoff." Very, very true to how our world is ever-changing. But if rule breaches affect an image that's highlighted matters, that could be misleading.

>>12950 It doesn't matter whether you disagree on Rule 7. If the post would haven't been a /q/ post, it would have been deleted for Rule 4 violation. When people why did you delete my thread in /q/ posts, posters and observers always thing they can disagree or argue about rule interpretation, but really these /q/ threads are not the place for that, and any attempts to have that discussion to date have involved Rule 3 and Rule 4 violations, instead of responsible discussions about what the rules and enforcement are. The main reason I mention Rule 7 above is due to the image being similar enough to pornography spam that previously violated Rule 7,8,9 or just Rule 7 and Rule 9. I haven't changed the Rules during my tenure as site admin, and maybe I should, I didn't make the rules and I am enforcing them best I can. This post was a generic tip of my tongue post request for the name of an adult actress disguised as a generic question. I guess I should more clearly posted a reply to the OP saying, Not on this site, try other sites or something. E.g Whilst can you post NSFW images on this site, they have to actually be relevant to a discussion and be spoilered appropriately, if you post inappropriate imagery it will be spoilered and if the image isn't relevant to the discussion, but the written post content is then your NSFW may be deleted , generally for being irrelevant, off topic or otherwise rule violating.

>>12951 Glad to hear that you're enforcing global rules as best as possible. >disagreements on rule #7 Okay, but it was in my opinion in how "unrelated content" seemed out of place. >This post was a generic tip of my tongue post request for the name of an adult actress disguised as a generic question OP's NSFW post requests Q&A seemed to get my attention since I mainly monitored https://lainchan.org/r/res/39406.html in contrast to https://lainchan.org/q/res/12273.html and I have been rule compliant. In regards to the accessibility of NSFW material, I don't know whereabouts on the imageboard could help anybody on NSFW post requests at the moment. Take care and have a great day. :)