Demographer on /hum/ should not be marked as spam

I found recently on /hum/ that there's an anonymous user who posts a huge demographic wall of text. The mods here rejected my posting xj9k's reports of them with a weird error message of 'go away, spammer' when I was trying to post. these threads keep getting deleted by mods and I do not want them to be treated as spam any longer. The user in question is trying to speak out, and I just want their threads here to never be marked as spam. They are not harassing anyone, unlike cp2 had in Jan 2024. Please help

>>12418 is the user in question the butthole spammer? if so, fuarrrk off everyones tired of your stupid shenanigans

>>12419 >"Is the user in question the 'TAKE ACTION' spammer?" Yes, it's that one whose thread image is just a whole lot of 'demographic' text and part of it is just logical shenanigans. Not meaning to be rude or hurtful, but I feel like you mods are 'hurting' something that is: -talking about some crimes -talking to people to take action on logical tactics This user isn't the same CP spam that we know of. It's like a lost alien trying to seek help but we keep throwing it out. >"Everyone's tired of your stupid shenanigans" In what way? Me or the user I'm speaking about? This is like the time Uboachan was pointing out my issues that weren't problems at all in what, nearly ten years? (Love your image of really cute cats though, it's very heartwarming!)

>>12420 >>12418 That user is a spammer and have been spamming us just as often as the other spammers you refer to. They continue to violate Do not spam or advertise unrelated content. and If you must post it, spoiler any NSFW content and make sure it's relevant to the discussion. and If you break the rules we will delete your post. Do it repeatedly and you'll be derezzed.

>>12422 The user's demographic but had been spamming us just as often as the other spammers I referred to (like CP2, for example). >Rule breaches Were they trying to advertise unrelated content when they are talking about antisocial personality disorder? This fits /hum/ in some ways.

>>12422 >image is just a whole lot of 'demographic' text and part of it is just logical shenanigans This section looks to be important; at least this user SHOULD spoiler the image at least but keep the logical tactics in the beginning.

The reason I do not want the 'demographic matters' person to be treated as spam any longer is because from what I read via xj9k's reports: -they were speaking out on development of mental pathology -crimes caused by people such as Rocco Siffredi and Xavier Becerra Whatever you mods are trying to do to this user is acting like you're censoring the demographer from /hum/'s existence.They clearly are trying to speak out on justice/logic issues/criminal behaviour, so leave them alone.

>>12422 >spam Beyond just reposting when they get deleted I haven't seen this too much. >unrelated I mean, arguing that certain medical procedures and sexual proclivities directly contribute to decline of societies and exploring the interplay between these things and human psyche seems right on target for /hum/. >spoiler NSFW I agree that anus-san has messed this one up sometimes, but this should be easy to fix. Just tell him to knock it off, and see what happens. At least it was always on-topic that I could see. tl;dr can we please just give anus-san one thread? the last few seemed to have decent discussion going before they disappeared into the void

>>12436 >"Beyond just reposting when they get deleted, I haven't seen this too much." >Certain medical procedures >At least it was always on-topic >"Can we please just give the mysterious demographer one thread? The last few seemed to have decent discussion going before they disappeared into the void..." That's important, but one of xj9k's reports in 2023 read that they avoid CP spam on Uboachan's /ot/ board, waiting for it to cease, then the mysterious user pops their demographic thread in. However, the user appeared while CP spam was being reported. In another report, the user in question said that they had been taking action for over fifteen years and "if it's ineffective action, then that's not really [their] fault when people just refuse to listen for various reasons". They're not only refusing to listen to this user, but also to those many others they quoted.

I tried to warn the user that I don't want a thread to get deleted time after time again because they are trying to speak out. https://lainchan.org/hum/res/78332.html got deleted while I said "NEVER DELETE THIS THREAD MODS" and lead to "Your request looks automated, post discarded" and gave me a 404. This is not right; why do you delete this user's posts when I darn well know they are trying to speak out? Please don't.

>>12436 He has already had 5 threads including 3 /hum/, and 1 /q/ and 1 /r/. His post quality has not improved and he has continued to spam. This thread will be locked.