Do you read posts that quote multiple other posts?

I don't, because I find it too complicated to follow reply chains. I hide those posts and all the posts responding t them. The exception is a reply to OP plus another post.

>>11821 I read the thread from the top-down, following a chain if it becomes particularly interesting, then I will move back to where I left off, skipping the posts I already read. >too complicated to follow reply chains That's a depressing thing to read. Is your day to day life very difficult to operate in? Have you tried to improve elements of your life in an attempt to be sure that it is a vitamin deficiency rather than an intellectual/mental one? If not, there are a lot of resources out there, provided you are interested.

>>11822 I'm glad others do this: it seems most imageboard users, especially NIGGERTITS users, will only skim a thread before posting. If a thread has over 50 replies I've read the most recent ~30 response chains. >That's a depressing thing to read. Is your day to day life very difficult to operate in? Have you tried to improve elements of your life in an attempt to be sure that it is a vitamin deficiency rather than an intellectual/mental one? If not, there are a lot of resources out there, provided you are interested. Your roasting of me brought a smile to my face and a laugh to my belly. I've been malnourished and vitamin deficient my whole life, I've just now, at 18, began to take vitamins and try to eat enough protein. When I try to follow response chains I become stressed, and I accidentally reread a post many times.

>>11821 I regularly write posts which reference three or four previous posts. I like to write long posts that matter. Since we lack names, this is also the only way to ensure otherwise unrelated posts and ideas are connected to one poster. Alternatively, splitting such posts is the only way to obscure that a single poster has written them.