please take out the trash

There is rampant pedophilia (both literally as random image links and other users that defend them as apologists) on the Lainchan IRC. This has gone beyond just "trolling," i'm seriously worried about the small group of people ruining everyone's experience by posting underage "traps" (or just people who intentionally look underage) and also "regular" homoerotic pornography in #lainchan which is in violation of the rules. This happens daily, and i don't see how appleman is not aware of it but even when confronted about that he does nothing about it. Instead he chooses to focuses on requiring me to get a license from him for a bot i coded (to give seddy redundancy) be allowed in #lainchan. The worst part is that it's not like it just happened once, it so bad that many users have become complacent and have accepted that this is the way things are (Rule #11 or #lainchan's cultural legacy anyone?) and that they should either accept it or just shut up. I am not one of those people, I find this behavior both appealing, morally bankrupt and highly illegal. Most of all it makes me want to puke. This is a board about cyberpunk and Lain, not about homosexuality, traps, cp and gay porn (or any porn). There is a place specifically for this, #lewd but it's empty and never used. I'm writing this here because i have messaged appleman1234 repeatedly on irc with no response and i have been messaging him about other things for 2 days. He has been in the channel (i can see from the logs) but he doesn't respond to me. I just thought there should be some official record of this behavior as many users have privately thanked me for trying to get rid of these people but i really can't do much without some kind of active moderator who can enforce the rules. I expect people have their own logs but if anyone wants i can provide continuous logs dating back to when lainchan was wiped by kaylx and beyond. Please ban these people and show them that you respect your own rules and do not approve of kiddy porn on lainchan Appleman. thanks

>>4958 OP, I agree with you completely on this. Pedophilia needs to be booted from lain. What the fuarrrk kind of space is this if we can't even do the basic task of eliminating pedophilia, pedo-posters and pedo-apologism? Here's why: it's morally disgusting, predatory, violent, inciting, contributes nothing positive to any discussion anywhere on this site, and is better suited for 4chan or stormfront or reddit or similar type soykaf forums. As an extension, I argue that racist trolls with their dog-whistle bait threads should also be booted. There's overlap between those who promote pedophilia and pedo-apologism and those who promote racism. These are inter-connected problems. These trolls are part of a coordinated operation: http://www.konformist.com/2000/genomics-eugenics-dm.htm http://www.konformist.com/2000/psych-lies.htm This is elementary basic soykaf. How is this such a festering problem to the extent that you needed to make this thread to even address this, OP? I commend you for stepping up btw. But, holy soykaf I'm so fuarrrking mad that mods won't take pedophilia seriously. What the fuarrrk is going on? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8noX2EdhxE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eKMspN-7Co https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KwruRfTbQE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKgtr7sYtw http://michaelparenti.org/FreeSpeech.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMKECxkEUEA http://michaelparenti.org/KozyWithKlan.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nnEACjDyvA http://michaelparenti.org/HiddenHolocaust.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-YgjmWMJB0 http://michaelparenti.org/Imperialism101.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU5P5noXZQA

>>4959 Pedophilia has been booted from Lainchan, as per the imageboard rules and the IRC rules. Keep your antiglobalist ranting in your antiglobalist /r/ thread please. >>4958 IRC drama doesn't belong on the imageboard, but whatever, here we go again. The OP is complaining about lack of moderation on an unmoderated IRC channel, and having exaggerated expectations about my availability to enforce server level moderation on a specific channel. I am not at keyboard 24/7, I have external commitments the same as most lainons. I do endeavor to read all the IRC backlogs, but I don't have an SLA with regards to responding to them. It doesn't happen daily. You don't get a response because you message me when I am either asleep or away from keyboard. As far as I can determine from the backlog, there was posting of NSFW images without the NSFW tag, which was generally frowned upon, but the images were not of children, and whilst anyone can make the argument for questionability, in this particular case the images were not sexual depictions of children. I will begin considering options in order to respond to your complaint, but currently the list of options looks like 1. Ban just the people you don't like because you don't like them. 2. Ban all the people that have said anything related to your criteria for banning ( which is at least 33% or 50% of the current 122 logged in users) 3. Blacklist #lainchan IRC , and nobody gets to join it 4. User whitelist #lainchan IRC , and implement a different consequence policy than the one currently in place, such that it is a model that privileges have be given , rather than taken away. 5. Shutdown / Blacklist all IRC channels except for the original channel the server was made for. 6. Shutdown everything. As for your request for a license ? You don't need a license, you need an agreement or to wait until the Automoderator system for IRC bots is written. In order to get an agreement you just ask for one and discuss the details, which so far you haven't done yet.

I'm on that IRC every day and I have no idea what you're talking about OP. Nobody posts anything illegal or even questionable. Also you need to narrow your aim. If anyone is posting CP or questionable soykaf (which I have never seen despite being there every single day), sure, let's ban them but there's nothing wrong with gay porn or traps or anything like that. It looks to me like you don't like the homoerotic soykaf and are trying to conflate it with CP to get a stronger reaction.

>>4960 >Pedophilia has been booted from Lainchan, as per the imageboard rules and the IRC rules. The very presence of crash bandicunt, at this point, says otherwise. Spare everybody ITT.

>>4960 I would suggest a more radical solution. Bring in a moderator who doesn't frequent the site for an objective opinion. Barring that you indeed do need to take action because this isn't just a one time thing that can be dismissed by looking at one or two pictures in questions. It's a systemic problem around here that has gotten so bad that no one noticed how wrong it is I could, systematically and one by go back and list offenses and make my case in an airtight manner, from previous experience you and others will just go back and point at each image and say "this picture no longer exists" "that, while depicting little boys in without cloths is a cultural thing called "trap porn" making the age of whoever took the picture beyond reproach." and "just because this picture is of someone under the age of 18, we don't know where the picture was taken exactly, and besides it doesn't look heinous enough compared to the REAL cp i see day in and day out." it's starting to become apparent that the phrase "pedophillia has been booted from Lainchan" is the extent of your solution. this has been an ongoing problem and it needs to be addressed. it's not a non-issue, not everyone finds pictures of very young looking boys assholes cool to post in a public channel over and over without consequences (and certainly not society at large)

>>4963 You're talking out of your ass mate. I saw those pictures you got butthurt about. It was just gay porn. Normal average, overage, gay porn.

>>4964 also for the record you'll notice the people defending this so called "gay porn" won't identify themselves by their irc nicks.

Keep irc soykaf in the irc please, don't bring that rubbish here to the imageboard.

>>4965 What's that got to do with it? We've gone from CP to gay porn to not using the name field...

And just so we're all on the same page. Here are the pictures. Nsfw ofc. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/339470192256221184/362321942717661184/image.jpg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/339470192256221184/361160214818455553/07e23772-7192-4632-b07b-9fb041c2eea9.jpg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/339470192256221184/359218625493598230/20170918_020617.jpg Not CP/10

>>4966 that which grows in the shade withers in the light. this is stage one of escalating this problem, i'm not going to stop, but i will give appleman ample time to show how serious is against this type of behavior. he deserves at least that much >>4967 use your real irc handle if you have an opinion. otherwise you are likely just the same person trying to make it appear that this place is more comfy for your degenerate pornographic habits.

>>4968

>>4968 the pictures are endemic and the burden of proof isn't on me to PROVE your very young looking gay porn pictures actually ARE CP. if it looks like CP, it might as well be CP because society at large does not approve of this type of thing, and they won't be so lenient if someone wandered into the channel and was assaulted by pictures like this. beyond that many people on the irc WORK FOR A LIVING and don't appreciate these type of pictures being posted tagged or untagged nsfw in #lainchan. there is a specific channel #lewd for these type of pictures and everyone has been warned repeadily by Appleman1234 himself to go there if you want to see that type of thing. and not confined to only these recent pictures. it's just that this time is the straw that broke the camels back in this case.

>>4969 I am the same person. I don't think there's any confusion there. >>4971 They don't even remotely look like CP. It's just some twink. You're trying to start a moral panic over homosexuality here. Society is not behind you. As for the unmarked nsfw. That's a fair point, they should have been marked but there was no need to go ranting on and accusing people of being pedos. And yes, people post trap/twink pics in the irc all the time. Have done for years. We don't mind.

>>4972 I DO mind and i hardly believe you speak for society or are even a part of it.

>>4973 Look, I'm not interested in a discussion on the merits of homosexuality with you. Just so long as we've established that it's that and not pedophilia, as you claimed, that's behind this though really, that was as easy as taking a look at the pictures. CP my ass.

>>4974 That's not been established at all. The only proof you have is that you've seen alot of CP before and "this isn't CP." While i'm sure you have seen alot of pictures of little boy's assholes before, you can't just say "this isn't cp, trust me bro." and think that means anything to anyone. what is a fact is that whoever that person is, their body is tiny and hairless, which is what a child's body typically resembles. "not cp my ass" my ass furthermore the fact that you won't reveal yourself imply's that you have something to hide, further making your opinion on this matter either that of a pervasive troll attempt or someone on who lives on unsure moral ground

>>4975 >what is a fact is that whoever that person is, their body is tiny and hairless, which is what a child's body typically resembles. "not cp my ass" my ass I'm glad I didn't click that soykaf, nigga.

>>4975 twinks != children Being hairless doesn't make it a child...

>>4977 if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, ITS NOT CP I SWEAR!!

>>4975 You know twinks shave themselves right? It's part of the feminine image and the person in that photo is not abnormally small. This is just absurd. You don't need to have seen a lot of CP to determine if someone looks like a child or not. That's absurd. Also, not revealing your name on an anonymous imageboard doesn't mean you have anything to hide. Again, absurd. You should play basketball. Your reach is amazing.

>>4979 >it's not cp i sware on me nan its just a twink what are you some kind of bigot

lol kill yourselves no homo t. expert resolver in internet relations

>>4981 >lol kill yourselves What words, how about you pedo. >homo I seen homos before and you are not it, pedofagggot.

>>4981 You know you're right. I am a little over invested in this one. Full disclosure. I fuarrrking hate pedos. I was sexually abused as a kid and I'll do whatever I can to make sure no-one else experiences that pain. When I first saw this thread I was ready with my pitchfork. Finding that it's just some fuarrrker crying because he doesn't like to see guy butts was a little jolting. Everytime you raise a false alarm it weakens the concept. Do it enough and people won't even bother to investigate. Next time at least make sure that it's not refutable with a cursory glance at the images. I should have a drink or something and calm my tits.

>>4980 >>4963 this >>4958 >not about homosexuality, traps, cp and gay porn (or any porn) >CP no, it is. >>4960 Don't let it be fuarrrked like with the loli users spamming there cp in volafile's /v/ideo game room. >>4983 >You know you're right. >crying because he doesn't like to see guy butts was a little jolting. >crying because he doesn't like to see children butts was a ''little'' jolting. >"not about homosexuality, traps, cp and gay porn (or any porn) - op" >When I first saw this thread I was ready with my pitchfork. >next time look at the child porn

>>4979 this place isn't as anonymous as people think, the sooner you realize that the better for everyone. i really, truly don't care if your gay, straight, pedo, lgbtqtfw. that's none of my business. neither is it my business what type of porn you look at. what i care about is lainchan as a community and not letting it be dragged down by a small but loud minority. that's why it needs to not just be discouraged but also prohibited from #lainchan, the irc's most populated public channel. this is already an issue that's entrenched and i'm waging an uphill battle against pretty much all of the most active members who seem to only want to keep brewing soykaf and trolling.. that's what they think lainchan is all about. this is my home too and i don't want to see it destroyed by trolls and questionable porn being posted in public channels. this is a board about lain and cyberpunk but because of lax moderation standards and cronyism the irc community has become a very different place. i don't care to paint anyone explicitly as the villain or drag people through the mud which is why i've kept everyone's handles out of this. i don't have to agree with your sexual proclivities to have lainchan's best interests in mind. the bottom line is that the rules need to be amended to say that while pornography is allowed on the server, it is not allowed in #lainchan with or without a nsfw tag. the vague policy of cultural blah blah need stop. >>4981 >>4980 also this is a serious discussion please don't derail or soykaf it up with petty bickering or by feeding the trolls.

>>4985 also someone else mentioned in #lainchan that if someone was so inclined, by these rules they could intentionally post CP without repercussions and nothing would be done about it except drag our community's reputation down into further decadence.

>>4958 Just to make things clear: I was there when the thing that triggered raXa to post this happened. The images that have been and was posted in the IRC was in no way CP and accusing these posters of posting CP is accusing them of a crime. Accusing someone on false grounds in this way is _legally slander_ in most places. The only minor mistake was not tagging them (nsfw) as per channel custom. My personal opinion is that raXa has been behaving incoherently and aggressively for no seeming reason for a week or two now, for no clear reason, doing things such as threatening to "turn people into his personal project" or "adding people to his personal project folder". Whenever someone levers any criticism at all against him he turns into this screeching incoherent person who only replies using vague accusations of, well, anything at all really. If several people do so he accuses them of ganging up on him. We all know how people arguing online can be like. This is above and beyond that. It is very strange behavior. He acts like an angry five-year-old high on some dissociative substance. One problem is that this sounds like I'm angry at him and trying to trash-talk him - I must point out that I'm not, I'm merely trying to be as descriptive as possible so that people understand that raXa most likely has some sort of IRL issues that is causing this behavior, and that people should probably not try to seriously engage him in conflict or discussion. What those problems are I don't dare guess.

>>4987 there's nothing clear about what your saying . your post is a string of thinly veiled logical fallacies mixed with your false narrative. for example: appeal to authority https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority ad hominem character assasination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem to be clear, i know why your doing this: because you know your wrong and you think you can get points from your buddies by acting like a highschool sophomore who's girlfriend's ass has been slapped. you actually just doing them the opposite of a favor by showing everyone a great example of the type people that are trying to shout me down at the top of their lungs 24/7 whenever something they don't like is brought up. your buttmad that someone isn't cosigning your friends bullsoykaf so you keep injecting yourself into a conversation (that no one wants to have with you) over and over. you agree that it shouldn't be posted but you quickly change the topic playing the victim. you do this in rapid fire with 5 other people in #lainchan and then try to disassemble my personality and inject your poorly thought out projected insecurities into it kindergarten isn't elsewhere, it's right here in this post.

>>4985 >serious discussion

Nothing was posted was CP. Refer to the Dost test.[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

>>4990 That's a good resource but if the person in those pictures is or was indeed underage at the time they were taken, according to the DOST test it looks like yes it would meet all 6 requirements and pass the test. the requirements on the wiki are: 1. Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child's genitalia or pubic area. 2. Whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity. 3. Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child. 4. Whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude. 5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity. 6. Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

>>4990 >>4991 Dost test is to determine whether pictures of children are just pictures of children or pornography. This is clearly porn. Dost says nothing about determining whether the subject of a picture is a child.

>>4992 it's like you said what i just said.. but better somehow. i'm happy we are on the same wavelength

>>4963 >the burden of proof isnt on me yes... yes it is... You made this topic, after admins had already looked the content in question over and determined it wasn't. Stop the false-flagging. Not to even mention you going to arisuchan and lying to them -- trying to get them mixed up in this.

>>4994 i didn't go anywhere, i hang out there too. i also didn't lie about anything, i linked to this thread to get some objective opinions from people who share a similar type of culture and aesthetic. back here, in the real world, i didn't say anything else other than #arisuchan is looking better and better everyday.. unless you think that is some kind of lie? i'm not going to be bullied or shamed into dropping this. i don't want to see cp or cp-looking porn in #lainchan. i say that picture looks underage to me, you say no it doesn't because you need proof. i say you need proof to prove it's not cp because it looks suspiciously like it. appleman himself said it's questionable and the fact of the matter is there is no absolute evidence either way. at this point it doesn't even matter about the content of the image or if it's genuine cp or not. that point was settled many replies ago. you can, like me, assume the opinion that it is cp (or at least resembles it) and try to figure out a solution that would keep this type of soykaf off of #lainchan on irc so i dont have to see shaved boy ass and cocks while i'm at work, or you can, like you, completely miss the point and argue that this isn't cp and you should be able to spam gay trap porn that looks underage "for the lulz" in the most populated public channel on our irc. i've been over this 5-10 times in this thread already. how do you even breathe with your head so far up your ass? a straw or something? oh i almost forgot, >You made this topic, after admins had already looked the content in question over and determined it wasn't. uh, what? no. i messaged appleman last night, waited 3 hours and then made this thread with no reply from him. he has only replied to this thread with his one post above and a message to me that says, " ??? " on irc. no further replies since that at 7:41am you are just making soykaf up now, whoever you are. i would like nothing more than for appleman to make an enforced rule on irc that says "no porn with or without nsfw tags are allowed in #lainchan, please keep it to #lewd" so i can stop firefighting here and delete this thread.

>>4995 I have the logs. I also have logs of all the malicious things you've said to random users for no reason. The pictures are in this thread, and still up on discords cdn (which has a report feature). Add to that, you're flinging criminal accusations around without having discussed any details with the administrators as appleman mentions in >>4960 If you care about this community as much as you claim to, you sure aren't showing it.

>>4995 >you can, like me, assume the opinion that it is cp That's retarded. Don't bother looking, just assume it's cp because that's what's convenient to your agenda (i.e. changing the rules to disallow porn entirely). >(or at least resembles it) But it doesn't. At all. >try to figure out a solution that would keep this type of soykaf off of #lainchan on irc so i dont have to see shaved boy ass and cocks while i'm at work, We're not here to do whatever you please. The people on IRC talked about it as it happened. Nobody minds people posting porn. >i've been over this 5-10 times in this thread already. And it's not going to go anywhere because it's not what that community wants. The IRC is not the boards and brewing soykaf is welcome there. Hell, we prefer people to soykafpost there and take serious discussion to the boards. #lainchan is explicitly unmoderated. Go to #general if you want somewhere where porn/brewing soykaf is disallowed. Also don't complain when you make a massive fuss about pedos that people want to talk about the pedos and not the point you were trying to push with it. >he has only replied to this thread During which he said: >the images were not of children, And I figure he said it because it's obvious to anyone with eyes. >no porn with or without nsfw tags are allowed in #lainchan And you felt the best way to do this was pretend that some porn you saw was CP? Nobody wants this rule. Everybody hangs out in #lainchan rather than #general because it doesn't have this rule. I'm sorry you clicked a nsfw link at work but this is the overreaction of the century and trying to drag pedo soykaf into it to evoke a knee-jerk emotional response is just dirty.

>>4996 i have my own logs too. no such malicious behavior exists, unless you want to include some logs where i wont roll over so you can engage in rape play or something, but thanks for proving my point on how #lainchan is no where near as anonymous as you think, appreciate ya. notice how i'm not samefagging behind anonymity like you are? that's because there's nothing malicious about me, i'm deeply concerned about this community. i'm also not a politician or running for president of anything so go ahead, mine your logs as long as you want big boy. your one trick is that you are just going to try and take things i've said to my friends (and enemys) out of context in order to support.. nothing. well to support suspicious looking "not cp" lewdness, traps and porn i guess, very noble of you. additionally, i did speak to appleman.. its right there in the post you are referencing. the level to which you care about this community is kind of evident in the amount of effort you made to make this post: none. speaking of flinging criminal accusations, you are the one escalating to that level. i'm here posting my grievances in the correct place and spending much more time then i would like defending all of our rights to not be subjected to these pornographic pictures while we are trying to hang out in #lainchan, but hey, keep pretending you are the good guy here. >>4988 if you didn't notice i already made this post except with different words right here while talking to whiteline. whiteline has been abusive and toxic to me over and over again in defense of his little crew of trouble makers and almost exclusively uses logical fallacies.. so you can pretty much see where this is going. it's pretty obvious who you are by your fixation on both me and the same two fallacies: appeal to authority https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority ad hominem character assasination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

k braindead commies and nazis morans were dumb af but I could deal with them but soccermoms and moralfigs? yeah no, there's a ton of cool boards where I don't have to deal with all that mess. Best regards aplelnegger I hope they didn't ruin everything for you sage because I don't care enough about that crap to bump a thread on a website I won't even come back to

>>4997 ok this is a little better, a nostalgic line by line refutation of everything i said in a post. god i'm tired of this soykaf but hey let's unpack this shall we? >That's retarded. Don't bother looking, just assume it's cp because that's what's convenient to your agenda (i.e. changing the rules to disallow porn entirely). yes that is my agenda, i'd like this community to be free of porn in #lainchan so we can have intelligent discussions about cyberpunk and lain. did you forget that this is after all a cyberpunk board about lain? i dont remember that much tentacle rape and hentai in the series but hey, it's been awhile. i did look at the pics and i did consider it CP. just because you keep yelling "NO ITS NOT CP, CAUZ I SAY SO" over and over doesn't actually mean anything. i addressed this in an earlier post >>4995 but thanks for actually reading the thread before you shart your opinion out > But it doesn't. At all. in the same way your opinion that "but it doesn't" is valid without absolute proof, "yes it does" is just as valid... if you don't understand please see my earlier post >>4995 >We're not here to do whatever you please. The people on IRC talked about it as it happened. Nobody minds people posting porn. I'm one of those people on irc so i don't know who's eyes you think you are pulling the wool over here.. yes we talked about it, ad nasuem and i don't really feel like talking about it anymore, but no, no one agree's that its ok. i've talked to plenty of people who don't think it's ok and in fact find it disgusting. right now i'm a a lightning rod for all the of dissatisfied lains who have been putting up with this disgusting behavior silently for far too long, and a lot of them are really really fuarrrking sick of it. the thing is they see exactly how you and your apologists talk to me and want nothing to do with it. i've gotten 10-15 messages from people just simply thanking me in private over the last day. >And it's not going to go anywhere because it's not what that community wants. The IRC is not the boards and brewing soykaf is welcome there. Hell, we prefer people to soykafpost there and take serious discussion to the boards. #lainchan is explicitly unmoderated. Go to #general if you want somewhere where porn/brewing soykaf is disallowed. >Also don't complain when you make a massive fuss about pedos that people want to talk about the pedos and not the point you were trying to push with it. i'm more surprised at how much people DO want to talk about it, it's been exhausting talk to all these people who WONT STOP TALKING ABOUT IT. this community has been corrupted by a small group of people that think they can treat people like playthings and do whatever they want, including ignore the rules without any repercussions. i'm not down with that >During which he said: >>the images were not of children, >And I figure he said it because it's obvious to anyone with eyes. Here's what he actually said: > As far as I can determine from the backlog, there was posting of NSFW images without the NSFW tag, which was generally frowned upon, but the images were not of children, and whilst anyone can make the argument for questionability, in this particular case the images were not sexual depictions of children. Here's some key words: "As far as I can tell," "anyone can make the argument for questionability," no one is certain whether these are or aren't. the fact of the matter is if there is even suspicion they shouldn't be posted at all as a best practice. sorry if i'm not as down with questionable porn as you are. >And you felt the best way to do this was pretend that some porn you saw was CP? Nobody wants this rule. Everybody hangs out in #lainchan rather than #general because it doesn't have this rule. you saying "everyone" and "noone" but i'm right here and i do want this rule..as well as all the people i've talked to that are so tired of this soykaf that they don't want anything to do with you and your ilk. >I'm sorry you clicked a nsfw link at work but this is the overreaction of the century and trying to drag pedo soykaf into it to evoke a knee-jerk emotional response is just dirty. i have no emotional feelings one way or another to anything in this thread. you are assigning and projecting emotions to me that belong to you.

Case closed

>>5001 Because he's the hero Lainchan deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian. A watchful protector. A Dark Knight.

>>4958 who the fuarrrk is raxa? go back to jp.

>>5003 I wouldn't be surprised if they were a .jp spy. No one cared about any of this before the split.

So your problems is that people could see NSFW links on work? Have you considered the best practice of not visiting shady links on chan IRCs during work? As much as I hate to say this, but chan culture has become the dark underbelly of the internet, and I hate this even more, but lainchan despite trying to distance itself of this is still part of chan culture(and probably always will be a part of ti). You shouldn't just carelessly click on links on chan IRCs during work. In fact you shouldn't be on chans in general during work if you fear that your boss might not be OK with even just a (bad) part of the content on it. Treat Lainchan like a sanitized imageboard. But nevertheless don't forget that it's still an imageboard like so many others.

>>4975 >furthermore the fact that you won't reveal yourself imply's that you have something to hide what are you even doing on an anonymous imageboard if you're against free speech and anonimity? stop trying to stir soykaf

>>5006 He's just reaching for anything he can to try and get porn derezzed with no regard for truth or decency or side effects. Hence the "I'm going to shout pedo at everyone until they relent!" Over an image that every single other person who's looked at it has said is perfectly fine. (good luck btw raXa, you're going to need it). He even pulled some great hypocrisy in the IRC last night. Someone was asking who these 10-15 people who had sent him messages agreeing with him were (pro-tip: he made them up) and suddenly anonymity is a sacred right and it was wrong to even ask.

>>5003 >who the fuarrrk is raxa? I think he is staff at Arisuchan.

>>5008 No, he is just a user from the lainchan irc.

>>5009 >No, he is just a user from the lainchan irc. Then why does he care so much?

>>4975 Are you fuarrrking serious GTFO, jesus christ how did you even end up here.

>>5011 got here from jp