(untitled)

What's the relationship between Lainchan, Uboachan, sushigirls and lewd.sx?

They call got together and had kinky imageboard sex

>>1692 We are affiliates, we link to them, and they link to us.

They are something like our "sister" sites. IIRC first sushichan became our affiliate and then uboa and then lewd.

>>1692 >>1810 So basically not owned but the site owners are cool with each other

>>1824 >but the site owners are cool with each other It doesn't seem like it. The owner of Lewd.sx is listed as a mod on their other site. https://lainchan.jp/faq.php

rip

>>1824 is like kicking dead whales down the beach lewd did that

We did email them when the .jp thing kicked off but they never got back to us. I guess now we know why.

>>1838 at least Seisatsu is cool

>>1828 >>1835 To my knowledge, this was never discussed in the AGM either. It's as if Appleman wants to turn a blind eye to all this unprofessionalism. I think it's going to bite him in the ass eventually. I mean look, we still even have them up on our nav bar on top. It's really sad.

>>1864 It was originally removed from the top bar during the AGM by another staff member, when it was reported earlier in a /q/ post and on IRC. It was accidentally added back (staff member unknown yet), and it has been removed again. We didn't get a reply in the negative from lewd.sx owner until 2 hours ago, which is at least 5 hours after AGM.

>>1719 >>1810 Affiliation carries a connotation that some find unpleasant. Please use membership instead.

>>1903 I've been speaking English for more than twenty years and I'm pretty sure that's not true. Are you high?

>>1906 Not the same guy but, the term affiliated is related to the "digital marketing" thing, that has some scams in it's history (Jeff Walker bullsoykaf a like).

>>1719 hey applebutt, we're still linked to lewd.sx on every board except /q/

>>1915 No we are not , please refresh your browser / clear your cache.

>>1916 I already did yesterday and we were linked, not anymore though