lainchan / lit

(untitled)

Miho Iwakura · 2021-12-17 04:47
Please address the matters covered by the text in the embedded file. At the top are some summaries with statements supported by material in an included compilation of many peer-reviewed studies, many medical books, and a few other sources in Trends & Associations. The last summary before the references compilation is about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics. It covers these logical fallacies: red herring, ad hominem, misrepresentation as another means of creating a diversion, and straw man. It also briefly covers the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy. Nothing is cited for that summary; academic supporting sources are very easy to find online, and can be provided on request.
Roger Pollack · 2021-12-17 05:20
We're gonna address the matters now, right here, right now: WE DONT CARE Thank you
Lady 3Jane.. · 2021-12-17 06:03
I've used a dildo a few times, several years ago, and my butthole is just fine. How does this make you feel?
Naomi Nascimento · 2021-12-17 07:14
>>7168 > I've used a dildo a few times, several years ago, and my butthole is just fine. 1. That is anecdotal evidence. 2. I wrote specifically about erotic anorectal violence. The "decadence" paste currently does not define that (an oversight which will soon be remedied), so here is how it's defined in the older "justice" paste: anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration. (Also, the traumatic risks summary points out that girthy and vigorous anorectal insertions are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious.) What you're talking about may not fall under that definition. > How does this make you feel? Either you didn't read and understand, or you are purposely ignoring, what was written about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics.
Unidentified · 2021-12-17 07:45
>>7170 >considerable girth It was a horsecock dildo.
Nemissa · 2021-12-17 07:54
>>7171 > It was a horsecock dildo. See what was written about stretching the anal canal with girthy insertions in the paste supported by studies included in Prolapse & Incontinence (among more studies in other portions of the references compilation).
Junichi Fujiwara · 2021-12-17 08:02
>>7172 But I'm fine. I have no issue controlling my butthole or retaining waste or other things.
Linda Lee · 2021-12-17 08:02
>>7167 just don't engage, he gets bored periodically. All I hope is that they're doing periodic database restores to make sure the bumped-off threads aren't lost. I feel like this post deserves a picture so here u go.
Miho Iwakura · 2021-12-17 08:04
>>7174 >All I hope is that they're doing periodic database restores to make sure the bumped-off threads aren't lost. His posts would bump off at most one thread, or potentially none if the board weren't full.
SHODAN · 2021-12-17 08:09
>>7173 1. Again, that is anecdotal evidence. 2. You are wasting my time. I can't post the "fi" paste here directly due to the key word/phrase censorship. Moreover, I can't post some relevant studies either for the same reason. See what is quoted from these studies in the references compilation: "Anatomical disruption and length-tension dysfunction of anal sphincter complex muscles in women with fecal incontinence." Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2013 Nov; 56(11): 1282-9. PMID 24105004. doi:10.1097/dcr.0b013e3182a18e87. "Internal Anal Sphincter Function Following Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Anal Fissure." Annals of Surgery. 2005 August; 242(2): 208-211. PMC1357726. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000171036.39886.fa. "Towards Safer Treatments for Benign Anorectal Disease: The Pharmacological Manipulation of the Internal Anal Sphincter." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2007 September; 89(6): 574-579. PMC2121247. doi:10.1308/003588407x205576.
Netrunner · 2021-12-17 08:11
>>7174 >>7175 As I've pointed out countless times before, ultimately this is not about me. Fscking READ what was written about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics, people! >>7176 > I can't post the "fi" paste here directly due to the key word/phrase censorship. That my "fecal incontinence" summary supported by Prolapse & Incontinence. > Moreover, I can't post some relevant studies either for the same reason. See what is quoted from these studies in the references compilation: More accurately I can't post quotes from those studies. Anyway, I'm done wasting my time for now. Grr.