(untitled)

If this pedo soykaf doesn't get fixed soon, I will leave this site. It's getting obvious that the admins here don't give a soykaf about CP. Honestly disgusting behavior; there are really good natural reasons for the general hatred of child rapists. Everyone who thinks that CP is ok should reconsider their value to this planet; maybe everyone else would be better off without you. pic strongly related

Btw, sexualizing children is always rape. They don't have the understanding to make such decisions. Hope this makes it clear enough for every deviant degenerate.

That's good, so you don't know three guys from vladivostok have been spammming this soykaf across all imageboards for 10 years at this point? I doubt that.

If you know so much, then why don't you leak them? Russian penalties: "Child pornography and online grooming: Criminal penalties include multi-year imprisonment (often 3–10+ years) and fines; distribution or production carries heavier sentences."

I tried doxing them. That's all I have. Russian intel needs to get involved but they dont give a fuarrrk.

Well, AI could block pictures with a child in them until mod approval...

Wtf are you talking about? There is no CP on the overboard, and it usually gets removed within an hour when there is.

1 hour ago there was CP, and why have that disgusting rep when it is avoidable? It is scaring off good people that imageboards like this one need. Why am I having the feeling that I'm talking to a troll?

>>95525 I assume you think you're one of the "good people"? Try running your own board for a while and then let me know how easy it is to avoid.

no reaction to this idea? >>95523

>>95523 Even just manual approval for uploaded photos before they're displayed on the site is worth it. If you're running some little website/imageboard/forum you really ought to do it that way.

good people = non-pedophiles. I hope you understand >>95526

>>95528 Why don't you use manual picture approval for this site then, maybe in combination with IP whitelists? If that would suck for Lainchan, then why not use an AI for filtering?

>>95528 Shit idea, it's too much work for admins to approve every single image even on a slow imageboard. And it will take too much time to see images approved. Most of the time the post would be "cold" by then (seen by everyone who followed the thread and unlikely to be properly revisited later when image approved). >>95523 >>95527 Nice idea, so why don't you create a browser addon and share with us? Ofc it's better to have this on backend, but it takes time & effort to implement. Imageboard admins in general rarely have skills and capacity to implement even basic features, let alone something as advanced as this. Most imageboard admins are hosting premade imageboard engines with minimal style/theme changes.

>>95529 You are an entitled retard. If you expect round-the-clock moderation, stick to mainstream sites.

> https://github.com/lainchan/lainchan Last commit 8 months ago. So go on smartarses, maybe some of you can make it and do a pull request. Also, please make sure the AI you use is free, something local would be perfect but it should'nt require GPU because I doubt lainchan's VPS even have one. Maybe we can even start together with something simple: find an AI model that can be used for this - either local or not - but it should be completely free to use.

>>95532 deviant degenerate, I dont want to see CP

>>95534 You didn't even make this thread in the right place, /q/. You add 0 value.

>>95531 >>95533 Sadly, I don't have any web dev skills. Maybe somebody else can do the trick. A free API is highly unlikely to exist, and running a local model without a GPU is unreasonable. But I found this: https://pypi.org/project/opennsfw2/

Here me out peoples! If you develop this make sure it doesn't ban anime l0lis and h3ntai. Maybe AI should only detect "risky" content and make those images hidden until further moderation decision. This way it will filter out cp and some l0l1s but the later stuff can be manually approved later.

>>95537 For the purposes of this site, it doesn't make sense for that to not be flagged. It wouldn't be approved on here anyway if the process was completely manual.

>running a local model without a GPU is unreasonable It isn't. A simple classifier (naked person? yes/no) can have decent results on small resolution images. I could probably train one on my laptop if I had a dataset. Detecting children would be more difficult, but it doesn't matter since legal porn isn't allowed either. Now, even if I had a dataset I wouldn't waste time developping that because you're an entitled idiot sperging about a non-issue.

>>95536 > A free API is highly unlikely to exist, and running a local model without a GPU is unreasonable. In this case, I guess, it should be a browser addon that also runs some kind of service on your PC in background and eats soykaf ton of GPU every time your load new images on lainchan. Would you personally use solution like this? Or do you expect admin to rent a new expensive VPS with decent GPU for AI? To pay for that, should we perhaps introduce a subscription based model for lainchan or maybe some kind of gacha? >>95536 Looks decent. Also, > Because there are almost no public benchmarks for OpenNSFW2 itself, we can use older or similar NSFW-classifier benchmarks (or related models) as proxies: In a 2019/2020 evaluation of an NSFW classifier called NSFWSqueezeNet (an “NSFW-optimized” network), the authors report: On a CPU (Intel Xeon + MKL): ~ 28 images/sec. On a GPU (GTX 860M + CUDA): ~ 77 images/sec for NSFWSqueezeNet, and ~ 40 images/sec for the original Open-NSFW model (on the same GPU). This tells us that “lightweight NSFW models” in practice can process tens of images per second even on modest hardware (on GPU), though that’s with a different network. The fact that NSFWSqueezeNet (smaller network) processes ~3 ms per image on CPU in another author’s claim shows that for small networks, CPU-based classification can be quite efficient. Given that OpenNSFW2 is not a huge modern deep model, it’s plausible — though not guaranteed — that similar or better per-image throughput could be achievable depending on batch size, image resolution, and hardware. >>95538 Lainchan? More like wokechan! Guess it's time to leave.

>>95541 You can post all of that you want on sayachan dot pl

>>95539 I doubt that you can do anything, pedo. honestly kys

>>95518 but there was never even cp posted on this site tho, special agent bob

>>95541 true, seems very promising. found this https://pypi.org/project/nudenet/ it can even run in a local browser https://nudenet.notai.tech/

cp is a problem on this site, hate to see it

What is the technical term for OP's fallacy/technique? It's more than "begging the question"? >>95518 >I will leave this site oh no

>>95548 are you stupid there absolutely was and is, it does get deleted but very slowly sometimes staying up for days. I think OP and some others here of course are probably retar ds dogwh istl ing about tr ans people and pulling the whole "tra n sness and tra n s people is pe dop h ilia" schizophrenic leap but this site absolutely has an issue with 1. People posting that stuff and sending links and 2. In ce l freaks talking about their love of drawings of chi ldr en or about how the age of co nsent should be 13. Its gotten worse recently and each time I see it I take a longer break from here.

>>95566 Point to it then. Where is it hiding?

>>95566 Girls hit puberty and start craving sex at approximately age 10, just like boys do at ~12. Do you remember being a 12 year old boy and being horny all the time, wishing you could make love with a female everyday? Or did your dad molest you and turn you into a glitterboy before that? There is no reason pubescent kids should be prevented from enjoying the lovemaking they naturally, strongly desire. Homosexuality however should be strictly illegal to prevent it from spreading.

>>95563 "'Begging the question' is a logical fallacy (petitio principii) where the conclusion is assumed in the premises — an argument that takes for granted what it should prove." cp is a real concern on this site, the technique is called speaking whats on his mind

>>95568 I am assuming you are trying to rationalize sex between a minor and an adult. disgusting! homosexuality is as uncurable as pedophilia, but at least gay people dont rape childeren. so why bother hating them, when pedos deserve all the hate?

>>95572 >at least gay people dont rape childeren LOL not only do they rape kids at a much higher rate than heterosexuals but they also lie constantly.

>>95573 if a gay person also rapes children, then this person is a gay child rapist. if they also lie then they are gay child rapist liers do you see the difference between the group of: gay people and the group of: gay child rapist lying people? a lying gay child rapist is actually a good description of a pedo. congrats, you know who we should hate. flood... Magni molestiae velit tempora. Qui repellendus similique nihil optio ducimus laborum. Nesciunt qui perferendis delectus sunt. Maxime velit quisquam aliquid qui. Iusto assumenda id ut quod. Fuga est asperiores magnam

>>95571 It's not begging the question, but it's something close to it. >>95518 >Everyone refuses to address this serious problem that does not exist, therefore you are all guilty and this site should be destroyed >>95568 >I'm going to argue with myself anonymously to make it look like the insane posters I claim exist actually exist >Pay no attention to the fact that the insane posters only appear in this thread

>>95579 >It's not begging the question, but it's something close to it. elaborate >">Everyone refuses to address this serious problem that does not exist, therefore you are all guilty and this site should be destroyed" I'm OP and I never said or meant that, and I want to stay. But I don't want to see cp, that's why I have created this thread. >">I'm going to argue with myself anonymously to make it look like the insane posters I claim exist actually exist >Pay no attention to the fact that the insane posters only appear in this thread" Sadly, I'm not arguing with myself. Maybe it seems as if I am arguing with myself because pedophilia doesn't get addressed this directly in other threads; there is the occasional cp image, which makes non pedos leave… and makes pedos feel like this is their place. a devil's loop that is fixable!

>>95538 any nude image can be detected using nudenet, it can even detect which regions contain nude parts in the image. I have just tested hentai on https://nudenet.notai.tech/ it is as accurate as if testing normal porn images

>>95591 >I never said or meant that >It's getting obvious that the admins here don't give a soykaf >disgusting behavior >maybe everyone else would be better off without you There is no reason to accuse the management of complicity. If it's actually as much of a problem as you say, then where is it?. Why the fuarrrk is this in /hum/ anyway, it belongs in /q/. Even /r/ would make more sense. It's almost as if you picked the most active board...

>>95518 pedo soykaf ? Report it so I can delete, you fuarrrking nonce.

>lainanon complains about cp bots >anime child "enthusiasts" uncontrollably seethe while posting puberty statistics Many such cases, anyways manual image approval would be optimal for now butlearn to report in the meantime.

>>95592 I also tested that one, and it does really work great. Which means, it can be done as a browser script (with stuff like Tampermonkey, etc), so those who consider it a big problem please go on, implement and share.

>>95567 >>95568 There you go for the second. For the first I literally dont know what to tell you, the mods delete it it cant stay up obviously that would be really bad. But i have seen images stay up for days, but go ahead with this retarded "i didnt see it so it didnt happen" nonsense. Im telling you ive been on this site for almost 8 years and only in recent history have I seen threadsnposted with images and links multiple times why would I make this up. Others are telling you it too, are you underage yourself? Why is this like incomprehensible to you it also used to happen in late 2000s and early 2010s on 4chan even but there was a lot more posts there and it got deleted even quicker than it does here.

>be retard >make it everyone else's problem But anyway. When is this thread getting moved to /q/?

>>95598 >the mods delete it it cant stay up obviously lmao >this retarded "i didnt see it so it didnt happen" nonsense just trust me bro >why would I make this up That's a real good question.

>>95594 > If it's actually as much of a problem as you say, then where is it? It's here around 2-3 PM EET and sometimes at around 1-3 AM (though, I'm not 100% on the night posters' schedule, because at that point I'm not being very... "punctual"). I know because I've been reporting them systematically to the authorities every time I've come across this fuarrrking soykaf. If you can't see it, it might just be because at that specific time you are either at work or sleeping and they are deleted before you can hop on to lainchan again. The specificity of the posting times makes me suspect some of the cp posters/bots are run by Europeans, which makes sense considering how 60% of all cp material is hosted on EU servers...

Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. Nobody wants this site to have child porn but this meltdown is unwarranted and childish. Report and the mods will remove it, as they've done literally every time it's happened.