(untitled)

Effective and serious action has been needed for far too many years.

>>77897 How do you suggest we mount an effective effort to alert the general population of this problem, and have the promotion of anorectal violence handled?

=== crystal.cafe /b/ Serious and effective action is long overdue. 12/06/23 (Wed) 10:26:06 PM 258685 https://web.archive.org/web/20231207000050/https://crystal.cafe/b/res/258685.html [Thread deleted] Anonymous 12/06/23 (Wed) 11:46:44 PM 258696 [Referencing post 258689] >so many instances of "you" As I've pointed out countless times before: Ultimately this is not about me. See also the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics included at the end of the OP image. > porn is bad. 1) Pornography *can be* problematic. 2) I wrote specifically about *violent* pornography. > a porn ban Nowhere did I advocate such a thing. It may not even be possible. > an anti-porn site like this That may not be accurate. /nsfw/ exists after all. > we need solutions not infographics. Fixing those flawed English Wikipedia articles mentioned in the OP image might be a good start. Beyond that, perhaps people ought to try to catalyze action by one or more medical establishments and governments worldwide. Of course, government action at least might make things worse depending on what kind of action it is: the U.S. federal government's obscenity prosecution against Evil Angel back in 2008 for example arguably did just that.

>>77900 >nsfw/ exists after all. wait what I've never heard of this and its a 404 for me >porn ban impossible? obviously possible. totally enforceable ? probly nawt >do these things for me you put so much effort int2 this mayb do dem urself

Don't engage in anorectal violence, then. Solved. Other people can do what they want and it does not affect your anus.

>>77901 oh wait I missed that this is about crystal soykaffe maybe they have an en es ef double (you) isnt that the aspirant femchan btw ? r u or do you claim to be a female?

>>77900 >replying to deleted threads elsewhere This is so pathetic.

>>77904 I think it's fun bubmin make me a mod

>>77903 he's a man

>>77897 It'd be nice if people would actually pay attention. > Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: > • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. > • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) > • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) > It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.

>>77924 you desire nothing more than to spam then if you are unwilling to have a genuine discussion on how to manifest your desired reality. your bullshit lines are, well, bullshit, you've structured your post for the express reason to grab people's attention, then you've made it so any discussion upon it is considered diversionary, and then once you caught negative attention and your posts were discarded you set upon spamming and called it censorship, and have continued to do so.

>>77924 > It'd be nice if people would actually pay attention. This board is about topics relating to humanity in general. So too is the OP image: >>77897 > Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant, constituting one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today: > • Due to its ubiquity in pornography, several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and seeking to emulate violent behavior that arguably should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perpetrators of this violence against one or more others going unpunished is a major problem, as is potentially-incriminating evidence being sold for profit and inspiring countless viewers. > • Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is contributing greatly to societal decay. Far too many people neither wish to think about nor seriously discuss anorectal matters, so rampant anorectal violence and its consequences "fly under the radar;" people would much rather focus on some other (in many cases far less dangerous) kind of erotic abuse. > • Widespread ignorance of what a human anus is even supposed to look like makes it an easy target for those who like to mutilate body parts. Although the anus is one of our most important body parts, typically it is very under-valued. It commonly is denigrated and intentionally harmed, a situation that is tolerated—or at least ignored—by far too many people. Since the vast majority of humanity likely never will care much at least about another person's anus, discouraging anoreceptive activities entirely is the only realistic solution. > Rampant anorectal violence is a product of societal decadence and contributes back to it: This is called a positive feedback loop.

>>77897 > Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant The "trends" portion (left side) of Trends & Associations is very relevant. There are numerous other sources that can be provided as well. >Reddit /r/painal Other subreddits which clearly violate Reddit's policy on violent content quoted below yet strangely [as of 2024/02/22] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people..." https://web.archive.org/web/20230719232538/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151 Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule." For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting anorectal violence in particular that arguably should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perhaps people at high levels of Reddit should be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of very dangerous violent behavior along with health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex.

>>77927 >reddit.png That NSFW image was meant to be spoilered. A mod can do so, or the post can be deleted and it'll be reposted later with the Spoiler Image box checked. To the Lainchan administration: Thank you for disabling the word/phrase filter that previously blocked the posting of some material that was recently posted (including Trends & Associations).

THEY CLAMP OUR CORDS. THEY VACCINATE. THEY CIRCUMCISE. THEY SODOMIZE.