(untitled)

Many people will need to address these matters seriously and effectively at some point. They'll probably need one or more catalysts first, though: most likely bloodbaths of justice. Also, fsck censorship and those who practice it.

Oh butthole-lainon, your valiant stand against censorship is so inspiring! People should be allowed to spam boards however they see fit. Would you please violate my bum uwu?

>>77740 of course, those evil people censoring your spamming annoying crusade against anal sex in a niche imageboard where no one cares! the world is really an unfair place! write to your local governor about this very important issue, or maybe go to a therapist. in fact, i think a therapist would be much better for you anon.

>>77741 >>77742 the way you reply to him makes you sound like offended glitterboys

didn't i tell you before that spamming was just gonna turn everyone against you? you did the same thing last year dude

By now people have to realize that this is just a troll.

>>77740 >>77742 Good .>>77745 Can you listen? IT IS NOT SPAM OR TROLLING, somebody is trying to speak out on censorship crimes!

>>77743 evidently you are not aware that this guy is spamming every day the same copypasta you smartass. i even gave it a read the first time and i could see the point, but i hate mentally ill spammers like this one and the other cp cancer that make imageboards close every year. it could also be the same strategy to make mods lose their soykaf and quit seeing that the cp is still not effective.

>>77750 >im mad at this thread >let me reply bump it to top yeah im smarter than you and you are also lying because its not even visible every time im here

>>77748 censorship crimes ? I thought this was the asshole thread

>>77743 I'm annoyed by OP and I want OP to be annoyed back. >>77745 Doubtful. They never bait, just spam.

People will have to start paying attention at some point. Perhaps not to what some lone messenger has written (although that would be nice), but rather to what many others have written in the referenced quote compilation. Sources also can be provided for the covered logical fallacies, but that shouldn't be necessary for anyone who knows how to search. >>77740 > Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: > • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. > • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) > • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) > It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.

>>77758 > rampant anorectal violence > an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation >Reddit /r/painal Other subreddits which clearly violate Reddit's policy on violent content quoted below yet strangely [as of 2024/02/16] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people..." https://web.archive.org/web/20230719232538/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151 Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule." For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting anorectal violence in particular that arguably should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perhaps people at high levels of Reddit should be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of very dangerous violent behavior along with health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex. > health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex https://web.archive.org/web/20231212220743/https://pst.moe/paste/xbaqwx That is a WIP commentary on archive snapshots of many /r/sex threads with at least preliminary commentary up to and including 202306 snapshots. Currently at least preliminary commentary was just finished for 202311 snapshots, and a new WIP edition may be published next month with commentary up to and including 202312 snapshots.

>red herring You always make your defense about "censorship" and you have explicitly stated in the past that you spam our board out of malice/spite because we "censor" your spam. >ad hominem You accuse anybody that doesn't like your spam of being a psychopath paid off by porn companies. >misrepresentation You have repeatedly claimed that your posts are not spam because you would have to profit off of them to be spam. That is not true.

>>77759 just FYI reddit tried to employ a p.file and when the community noticed they started banning anyone discussing this instead of stopping the hiring. That place is beyond a soykafhole.

As a reminder: === lainchan /hum/ J.C. Denton 2024-02-12 00:14:10 No.77582 "At some point people will have to stop censoring and start listening." [TAv3] [Thread deleted, as expected] https://web.archive.org/web/20240212104629/https://lainchan.org/hum/res/77582.html Crazy Jake 2024-02-12 00:30:42 No.77583 This material undeniably is very relevant to humanity in general, so it's quite curious indeed that so much hostility has been experienced from the site's administration. I'm guessing it's politically-driven, i.e. due to leftism. As an agnostic atheist I see major problems at both ends of the political spectrum. Humanity is deeply flawed: the fact that I've been "crusading" over these matters for more than 15 years serves to reinforce that notion. If this thread is interfered with administratively, as many of my previous ones have been, then people on this site can expect me to go full "dump and run" mode with zero interaction going forward. Call me a spammer all you wish: I gain nothing monetary from this endeavor, and I never have. I'm just an unspeakably fed-up straight guy with an aesthetic anus fetish. Sure, it's weird, but I've come to accept this unusual attraction to one of our most important body parts despite it being commonly denigrated (e.g. calling someone an "asshole" as an insult), abused, and very undervalued. And yes, you can call me an asshole. I do spew vile soykaf from time to time, but I daresay I have some redeeming qualities as well. > If this thread is interfered with administratively, as many of my previous ones have been, then people on this site can expect me to go full "dump and run" mode with zero interaction going forward. That means: Expect zero direct replies. What is written in the OP image can and should stand on its own.

>>77759 >Expecting Reddit to follow rules consistently They ban subs when they think advertisers will be upset or when there is negative press. Come to think of it, that is likely an angle you could exploit. If you were somehow able to get any sort of mainstream article mentioning those subs and saying Reddit is like kicking dead whales down the beach, they would probably ban them. Of course your specific brand of activism would never be the focus of such an article, but maybe there could be some other focus, and the same goal would be achieved.

>>77762 >so it's quite curious indeed that so much hostility has been experienced from the site's administration. They've been *extremely* lenient with you. >then people on this site can expect me to go full "dump and run" mode with zero interaction going forward. Lmao you've threatened that so many times. You're too much of an attention whore though, you keep coming back. >Call me a spammer all you wish You mean, call you what you are.

>>77740 They CLAMP (asphyxiate), vaccinate (penetrate), circumcise (mutilate). Society is a form of penetration fixation and sublimated sexual aggression down to the core.

>>77745 He's been spamming for too many years, I doubt it's a troll.