Please address rampant ano rectal violence along with factors facilitating it.

>>63393 > The majority of this thread belongs in >>>/q/ No. You, myself, and anything relating to this particular site ultimately are utterly unimportant compared to the gravity of the topics covered in the first paragraph (the "tl;dr" paste) of the locked thread. > you [...] you [...] you've [...] you [...] your [...] you I see that somebody quite obviously is not listening. What part of "ultimately this not about me" do you fail to comprehend? Perhaps you are purposely ignoring that in order to engage in a smear campaign? >Reddit /r/painal Other subreddits which obviously violate Reddit's policy* regarding violent content yet strangely still [as of 2022/10/15] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles /r/analfisting * "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people" https://web.archive.org/web/20220918033407/https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151 (Notable addition made in September of 2021: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule.") For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting some violent behaviors—particularly ano rectal violence—that should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). People at high levels of Reddit must be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of violent crime along with dangerously false information facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex.

As of 2022/10/15 relevant English Wikipedia articles for many years have had major, inexcusable flaws. Among them: • The "human anus" article depicts a human female's anus and perineum that probably were damaged by some kind of major trauma. Biological human females normally lack an evident midline perineal raphe, or seamlike union/ridge, in the anogenital region; as the bulbospongiosus muscle is separated in them, embryologically it does not promote formation of an obvious, raised seam as it may in biological males [References: Anatomy & Trauma]. Furthermore, the "perineal raphe" article suggests otherwise involving fusion of urogenital folds, which normally doesn't occur in biological females[1]. • The "simple columnar epithelium" article explains neither its fragility nor (at least in the ano rectal region) absence of somatic innervation. The "anal sex" article ... • lacks neutrality; it gives the impression that opposition is limited to irrational religious positions by omitting any _scientific_ opposing perspective, e.g.: The human anorectum is very unsuited for many common receptive activities due to the region's anatomy and physiology. The single short-term benefit, _potential_ pleasure, is greatly outweighed by the many short- and long-term health risks to a receptive person. • fails to mention the normalization of injurious ano rectal violence in pornography featuring real people. • does not disambiguate "hemorrhoid(s)," which can refer to pathology or normal anatomy. Anoreceptive activity can both cause hemorrhoidal disease and worsen an existing case. • contains a logically-fallacious appeal to nature: "natural" is not necessarily good or desirable. Those contribute to rampant ano rectal violence along with misinformation facilitating it. Their persistence for far too long calls into question both the factuality and the impartiality of everything on the site. 1. Clinical Anatomy. 2013 Jan; 26(1): 134-52. doi:10.1002/ca.22177. (PMID 23169570)