Please address rampant ano rectal violence along with factors facilitating it.

Generations of people have been, and continue to be, inspired by pervasive violence: namely ano rectal violence. Many perpetrators of this violence against one or more others especially in public pornography have not faced severe criminal punishment despite both 1) the high likelihood of ano rectal injury to a receptive person due to ano rectal fragility, and 2) the significance and potential severity (even lethality) of resultant traumatic consequences. What should easily be considered incriminating evidence worldwide not only proliferates unchecked, but also serves as an example to be copied in far too many cases. This situation is both one of the greatest injustices and one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence in the modern era. Facilitating factors include prevalent (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation about ano rectal topics, which are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with ano rectal violence and to spread disinformation quite effectively. Any references whatsoever have been omitted intentionally. Plenty of people should have seen them and/or know where to find them at this point. They can always be posted later in the unlikely event that this thread is neither censored nor interfered with in any other way. Of course, posting such references probably would trigger said interference. People ought to avoid this place due to its extremely questionable administration.

>>63349 I am Catholic OP and I believe that by praying the rosary, and asking for the conversion of the LGBT-types, and for the conversion of the shameless sexual deviants, I am addressing this issue. Not only that, but I think prayer is really the only way to address such an issue. Reason doesn't persuade people. With prayer however, God can reach into people's hearts (i.e. a component of their will. I too, had a mistaken, romanticised interpretation of this kind of language) and open them up to seeing, and accepting the truth in such matters. Nonetheless, I don't think Lainchan should be avoided, just because the admin team are in favour of those things. Can you demonstrate that your fears regarding the use of this site, because of its admin-team, are well-placed fears and are reasonable, and not unfounded? My notion of the Lainchan-admin team is that they actually adhere to rationality, and really do believe in Freedom of Speech. If they support such a freedom, why couldn't someone who rejects such lifestyles come here? What kind of "harassment" could they face? Not only that, but, they even permit Torposting. How could they possibly identify you, without knowing something about you, which you revealed in that post? Without identification, how can they harass you?

>>63350 >Praying change anything Believe it if it make your life better but keep the nonsense for yourself. Any statistic about the male homosexual community and the trans show how destructive it is but I would rather not post it there because I think lainchan is better without sexuality. Like Lain so to say. The show is about many topics, one of them is identity and so it's the fate of this place to be submerged with people who make their entire person turn around how other people perceive them. They are attracted to those kind of places like flies are attracted by soykaf. > the Lainchan-admin team is that they actually adhere to rationality, and really do believe in Freedom of Speech. We are all humans and so we are all illogical by nature. It take great effort to overcome our own minds and few are the people who even try to do it. Freedom of speech died a log time ago, let it rest. Now way too many people take things too seriously and think everything is a crusade against evil.

>>63349 > People ought to avoid this place due to its extremely questionable administration. That is nowhere near the level of "whining and crying." It is merely a suggestion offered to others based on many past (bad) experiences, some of which were archived on two fairly well known archive sites. >>63350 > I am Catholic OP and I believe that by praying the rosary, and asking for the conversion of the LGBT-types, and for the conversion of the shameless sexual deviants, I am addressing this issue. People believe all sorts of crazy things. That is one major reason for the world being in the sorry state that it is currently. Anyway, I posted nothing whatsoever about religion. That is a red herring. > I don't think Lainchan should be avoided You are welcome to your own opinion. > Can you demonstrate that your fears regarding the use of this site, because of its admin-team, are well-placed fears and are reasonable, and not unfounded? Nowhere was fear mentioned. You are putting words into my mouth. And yes, if necessary I can reference quite a few archived threads from the past that arguably were deleted without good cause, but I suggest instead that anyone interested try to find those themselves — especially among this apparently tech-savvy community. As should be obvious from the OP, the administration here is very unpredictable, and so for now I am choosing to refrain from linking _anything_ so as to avoid triggering any member(s) of said administration. > Not only that, but, they even permit Torposting. 1. Some medical terms common to my posts and pastes were in the past blocked by a word filter, such as "anorectal" without bothersome workarounds. That is censorship. Moreover, OCR was even being used at one point to block the posting of images containing those words. 2. Some people were complaining a while back about numerous Tor exit nodes being derezzed. Those nodes were derezzed due to my posts. > How could they possibly identify you 1. As I have pointed out countless times before: Ultimately this is not about me. Don't give me reason to post the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics yet again. 2. The administration here can identify people who post similar material repeatedly, such as that first paragraph in the OP. The paste is new (I call it the "tl;dr" paste), but the content is not (I've posted about the same matters with different wording many times before). And speaking of that first paragraph, please focus on what was written in it, and try to address the issues covered with actual action rather than begging one or more entities that may or may not actually exist. Thank you kindly.

>>63367 Spam prevention isn't censorship. No cogent notion of "free speech" allows you to pester people ceaselessly.

>>63368 As I wrote recently in deleted thread 63334: "Keep on incorrectly labeling and treating this material as spam when it most certainly is not. Delaying and doing nothing serve to allow more and more violent criminals to escape justice and increase in number..." > No cogent notion of "free speech" allows you to pester people ceaselessly. 1. Until very recently I had not posted here for quite some time. 2. On places where censorship and/or any other form of undesirable administrative interference are not factors, I tend to both stick to one thread and after a short time (generally one week) make infrequent posts in that thread when others are not participating. Sometimes I'll bump the thread with "bump" or something more substantive, such as a relevant study or article not currently included in those named quote collections comprising that Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation I reference. >>63367 > the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.