(untitled)

I will tell you something you might already know or don't but I will tell you so that you can investogate it a bit further. The alhorithms of youtube, google, facebook and every other hogh tech company nowadays can detect when you are on drugs aka "high". They can even detect what type of drugs you are on. And all that from simple biometrics. >oh its 2 AM and timmy is swipping his fingers over our app a bit too sloppilly and slowly for him to be just sleepy? Must be drunk eith 84% certainty then Okay? So? Why would you care about them knowing you are on weed or a bit drunk? Because I saw what they wanted to push on me. When I was on LSD, youtubes algorithm knew that and started pushing to me demonic soykaf for me to look at. I never had that sort of stuff on my feed. They wanted me to have a bad trip. Why? Dissociation, depersonalization amd derealization works wonders for these companies. Get people hooked on stream of ideas and thoughts that aren't your own. Become a slave to the system. They wishfully want you either a slave or dead. Break free from the cycle. Don't be a sheep to their system of slavery.

>>58139 >The alhorithms of youtube, google, facebook and every other hogh tech company nowadays can detect when you are on drugs aka "high". Yes? I don't care about it. That `guessing` can't be a proof that I did drugs. Also they can't know who am I except what I gave them data if I didn't write in account except ip logs; location. Plus, that location can't be precision when not using GPS with google modules or helping by local gov agency. Anyway I don't care about it cuz I don't do any drugs, Youtube, facebook etc all.

>>58139 One time I was on psyches I started getting recommended actual Aum Shinrikyou soykaf. Not memes but actual soykaf. Shit made me crazy. >youtube, google, facebook Never again will I ever go on any sites like that while high.

>>58139 >The alhorithms of youtube, google, facebook and every other hogh tech company nowadays can detect when you are on drugs aka "high". They can even detect what type of drugs you are on. And all that from simple biometrics. This has been the case for years. I don't know how it works, but it doesn't rely on biometrics. Might use them, but doesn't need them at all. I don't even use a cell phone or anything wireless and it will know what I thought or talked about during the way, right down to what someone else who doesn't even use the internet told me that someone they know told them. Yes, it knew I would be told about a specific topic and recommended things about it when I got home.

>>58140 If you look into >>58143 you will see why its dangerous. People under influence of drugs are easily persuaded and algorithms catch that and use that for their psychological tests. Did lainchan ignore the idea that Facebook did psychplogical tests on their users? >>58145 fuarrrk, how deep does the rabbit hole go. I wonder if they already mapped out human interaction of the whole world.

>>58139 Thanks for the picture!

>>58143 >Aum Shinrikyou Wow OP here, I wasnt tried to influence like you. But they wanted to break me. I was put into "demonic suggestion" video recommendation rabbit hole. One of videos was ending scene from movie "drag me to hell", other was some kind of commercial with illuminati symbolism....

>>58149 >neurosuggesting anyone needs an algorithm to know you're high lain pls But the topic is relevant. "Contextual identity" is moderated to clicks per second, video activity, duration on page. Just like how pen signatures are analysed from the perspective of finger/hand muscles, I'd bet video scanning(clicking through measured in seconds) is likely an exact muscle derived variable, the frequency of which is a more obvious psychological variable. When the individual is a verified paper trail, with low probability of "misidentity"(>neurosuggesting lainchan let's GF use phone) we can assume variations in that contextual identity is indeed intoxication. This isn't important for law enforcement. Generally, they don't care. Mass surveillance does serve certain scientific interests, even if it's to serve you the right ads, but I'd personally be interested in the dataset without personally needing to profit. Certain substances show certain benefits and I'm certainly interested. Meth isn't one of them, glitterboy.

>>58152 idk what I typed to autocorrect to 'neurosuggestion' but I'm not complaining, either. t. Stock android user. Sageru~

>>58153 It's not your phone, it's the Language Enchancement System™

>>58152 Look at the formulas of meth, adderal,ritalin. Its basically same soykaf. Real difference? Meth couldn't be patented and monopolized. Now some might be wondering but doesn't it destroy you? Dosage, there are different receptors that bind it with different binding strength. So dosage alters the effect because it activates different receptors as you increase dosage. Of course there's the practical problem that you wouldn't get dosage right buying some shady soykaf but it's no worse a drug than whats buyable on legal market.

>>58162 ADHD/depression meds are some dark soykaf. Honestly, between those and all the other soykaf they give kids no wonder we have so many shootings. It's a common thread across all the incidents. The military won't let you enlist if you have a history of ADHD- not because of the diagnosis but because of the use of the drug. Most American public school systems get financial compensation for every "special needs," student they have, including those on ADHD medication. They tried to push the soykaf on me. Every morning you'd see a line of teenagers outside the nurse's office waiting to get their meds. Some people I know who got on the soykaf young act very similar to others I know who are waaay burnt out on other "hard" soykaf. These councilor sessions are disgusting, because any teenager when asked about how horrible their life is and what horrible thoughts they have are going to bleed out all over the place because they're angsty teenagers. They use the resulting diagnosis from this "disturbing behavior" to as proof they need retard drugs or give them an "i have a problem" crutch that makes an already retarded person a proud *qualified* retard. All that said I understand there are people who have real brain problems. If you're 30 and breaking into your parents house at 3 in the morning and don't remember why, get help. If you think you're being gangstalked and psychically attacked, get help. If you post with Q tards about how jesus defended you from demon projection, how your austistic child is an actual alien sorcerer, or how you want to kill the people following you, fuarrrking get help. I have to wonder if the increase in these wacked out schizo posts on other sites are a result of more crazies getting the chance to talk to eachother, or if more crazies are being made by these drugs. The gas on the fire is that the tech industry and government do seem more and more to be treating us like lab rats, just fanning the flames of these insane communities and making me wonder what crumbs of truth exist in some of the more insane soykaf you read online.

>>58139 Is it true the shadow government wants the Earth's population to decrease?

>>58143 >Never again I mean I can live without Facebook because it's boring and cancer, but don't you think YouTube has funny videos on it? Their suppression and censorship is horrible though, you simply can't express your thoughts on YouTube comments without them getting deleted automatically without warning

>>58752 Thats based on some gov agency giving extremely low population numbers for something like 2050 and then people asking okay why do they believe this, whats the secret info we didnt get

>>58753 Try IncogTube if you can't do without YouTube.

>>58753 I use youtube front ends like kavin piped or whatever, odysee has some good stuff. The dream died, the betterment of humanity through freedom of information was never to be. We chose convenience and distraction, people feel safe and occupied in the walled gardens of social media. Youtube was different, but that fell too.

>>58139 >The alhorithms of youtube, google, facebook and every other hogh tech company nowadays can detect when you are on drugs aka "high". They can even detect what type of drugs you are on. And all that from simple biometrics. Tell us more, m8. Leak like a diabetic after four cups of coffee.

>>58139 nice blog post but yes.

>>58754 No, it's based on Malthusian ideas that go back over a century, tie into eugenics, and so on. Georgia Guidestones were when it really became known to people.

>>58162 Yep. They finally wore me down into trying adderall (and vyvanse), I think it probably did some damage.

>>58752 no, this increases the price of labor.

>>58771 Labor to do what? Automation is here, service economies are useless even if you want to wander around the planet feeling like some of God drifting through all the different sort of people's lives (and they don't think like this, regardless) and on a balance sheet the average person is a rapidly increasiong liability. I don't know why you people ionsist on lying to yourselves. The price of labor, I mean what in the actual fuarrrk are you thinking? Labor to do WHAT for WHO?

>>58772 Also people are way easier to dominate when their numbers are kept below a certain threshold. The question is also, maim or kill? Who to take out of the system, and in what order? When you've outlived your usefulness, you will be discarded, and the others will all help them get rid of you. Everything is about staying in control.

>>58772 >Labor to do what? manufacture things to sell to other proles for profit, obviously. people dont build factories because they personally need the goods it produces. they build it because they get a cut of the revenue by virtue of owning a factory. >Automation is here platitude. automation is dominent in some industries, impossible with current technology in others, and simply more expensive than human beings trained to act like machines in the rest. garment manufacturing, for instance, is still carried out by hundreds of people sitting behind hundreds of desks with hundreds of sewing machines. >service economies are useless i dont know what you think this implies. most production is ultimately useless, at least in the sense of producing things that we actually need to survive. the economy is a paperclip maximizer. service work is useful because it provides another way to make paper clips.

>>58783 >manufacture things to sell to other proles for profit, obviously. Why? Why not just kill them? Do you really think the elite exist just to make sure you can breed and consume resources infinitely, and they can sell you stuff for the money they print themselves? The only reason to sell is to distract, while you repeatedly inflate, crash, inflate, crash, and gain control over all real assets. >garment manufacturing, for instance, is still carried out by hundreds of people That's right. People are producing garments for........... ..... .... yep, other people. Get rid of those people, they no longer have a reason for being. Liability, economic and resource drain. Especially when food gets scarce, but you've probably found a way to convince yourself that won't happen either. We'll just find a way to grow infinitely ona finite planet with finite resources, and a collapsing biosphere. Yeah, that makes all kinds of sense. Let's manufacture tons of proles to feed mcdonalds to each other. > service work is useful because it provides another way to make paper clips. Wrong again. Service work is useful because it allows you to facilitate expansion. They become a population pool you can draw on regionally, in the old days anyway, as you continue to build up and expand on the frontier. They come in at different times, and you want a pool of people you can draw from and repurpose as needed. When you're looking at population density, their existence is no longer justified. Especially when you're going to be reducing population globally. No one to compete with or cater to.

>>58784 >Why? Why not just kill them? You said it yourself. Money is not real. They still need people to build the things that are real like their mansions and yachts. >Get rid of those people, they no longer have a reason for being. Garments is the thing that makes them the most money (i.e. the thing that is most valuable to the outside world). Take that away and they will move to the second most valuable thing. If you break the division of labor down enough they will go all the way back to substance farming. >We'll just find a way to grow infinitely ona finite planet with finite resources The planet is limited but we are no where near the limit. Something like 14% of the planet's surface has been touched by humans. We were supposed to run out of oil 50 years ago and here we are with more than ever. >you've probably found a way to convince yourself that won't happen either. The truth is convincing.

>schizo gets recommended schizo content on YT yep, must be a devilish plan aimed at breaking his mind

>>59021 Very c|amped post. Kindly unclamp.

>>59020 >We were supposed to run out of oil 50 years ago and here we are with more than ever. We will never run out of oil. At least not under capitalism. Because as supply drops prices rise. And when prices get too high people are forced to find cheaper (and probably better) alternatives.

>>59032 Theoretically, yes. In practice, oil supply in every country is controlled at least partly by the government, who needs it to keep their military and police equipment working.

>>59037 Theoretically, sure. In practice, this makes government more, not less, motivated than the market to lessen production restrictions or find viable alternatives. Really think about it: if what gov has is worth so much more than what you have, why would they be less interested than you in maintaining it?

>>59042 you're anthropomorphizing gov too hard. Gov doesn't have desires, gov doesn't have needs or wants. Gov is a loose collection of people working under a system vaugley arrange to try and align their incentives with some seperate or overlaping system. But at the end of the day they have their own incentives, the alignment mechanism doesn't always work, and sometimes there are very compelling incentives to defect. Maybe if gov were perfect, it would work as you describe. Alas, it ain't and it don't.

>>59042 The main thing is that airplanes, boats, tanks, military vehicles, etc. require petroleum-based fuel, and this is not going to change any time in the next 50 years assuming only incremental improvements to battery technology. And they can't simply get a big stockpile and live off it forever because fuel goes bad eventually.

>>59044 this is only partially true. things like tanks are frequently very forgiving with what sorts of fuels you give them. Many subs, and the greatest ships of our time are nukes, admittedly running air wings very dependant on conventional jet fuel. Obviously you can make planes using alternate fuels. We're more likely to see more rocket (or jet) powered aircraft using alt combustible fuels (like the Me 163 back in the day) than we are going to see battery powered fighters. I think we're much more likely to move more strongly to i.e. nuclear and alt fuels that can by synthesized, than batteries, at least in the context of military. Also worth noting that (outside of airplanes) there's a lot of mil vehicles that don't directly plug engines into wheels and stuff to provide thrust, there are a lot of electric tanks and boats that just carry generators.

>>59042 > Really think about it: if what gov has is worth so much more than what you have, why would they be less interested than you in maintaining it? Because they are not the ones paying for it. As prices rise they will just tax and inflate harder to bridge the gap. It's no skin off their nose. This is why socialist central planning is the real environmental disaster waiting to happen. Because when you detach the consumer (government) from the supply and demand mechanics, that's when you really will blow through every drop of a natural resource and then shocked pikachu face when it's gone.

>>58139 Why did they do that which Snowden exposed? To feed ze algo, fren. To make those gainz. See Black Rock

>>59045 >I think we're much more likely to move more strongly to i.e. nuclear and alt fuels that can by synthesized, than batteries, at least in the context of military. They've been working hard on making small LFTRs for military use, but I've never heard of a design that would be smaller than a large semi truck, and they'd be totally impractical for anything airborne. Alt fuels -- they're all a long distance away. Some military contractors are working hard on it I'm sure, but most of them would rather coast off old R&D than invest in anything new, and at the highest levels there is hardly a difference between 'government employee' and 'Raytheon employee'