(untitled)

dd bs=1 skip=16058 of="embedded.tar" if="136a362eb54e3ea551cbfbf0256df004.png"

Honestly so ive been seeing you for years. I had an argument with you once where I realized your not so bad. I dont think you realize that like your points are almost undisagreeable. Its not that anyone wants to censor you its that your interest in this topic makes it seem like you are trying to imply something much greater or political. But then when it gets down to it, its like your just kinda stating something no one would disagree with. So jts really odd where its this seemingly inflammatory topic that ends up not being so but then when it ends up not being so its almost like a "whats the point of this?". It could be because its lainchan too, I think a lot of places would appreciate in depth research on issues of being safe with anal stuff. How much is too much and what not. Most people here though probably havent even touched that stuff. I have, and obviously you are right. Its something you have to be careful with and take precautions about. I just dont get why you think its so controversial or that your being censored vs you portray it in a way that makes it seem like your saying something very insane as well as the inevitable finding out its very reasonable but on a board where probably only a few of us engage in any of that kind of activity. So its like a double whammy of it seeming like its supposed to be inflammatory and then seeming pointless. Which I dont think it is pointless, I just wonder if this is the right place to be educating people on this and also if there isnt a way to do it that isnt with so many nebulous yet specific terms that make it seem like your attacking people or some ideology vs a very real kinda safety boundary.

>>53355 Also (cont) to your credit your one of the few people that ive noticed even when you have a window to sell some larger point or say something inflammatory you actually dont you stick to the topic your presenting. its just youve presented it so many times insistently it seems like I think your trying to make a larger point other than the reasonable one you are making. Like I always think you are trying to stretch at something and you arent you just are stating there is physical safety limitations to how intense of anal play you can engage with. Thats of course true.

>>53355 > you are trying to imply something much greater or political The decadence paste expressly covers various topics and makes explicit statements. Perhaps you are reading express statements as implications, but they are not. > your just kinda stating something no one would disagree with. As I wrote in the paste I mentioned: Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with [self-]destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. Ignorance may cause some people to disagree, especially if they've been misinformed. Maliciousness may cause some people to disagree, especially if they're purposely trying to spread/promote disinformation. Various mental disorders and/or disabilities may cause some people to disagree. Etc. > its this seemingly inflammatory topic that ends up not being so Your conclusion is based on at least one faulty premise. This material most certainly would be controversial e.g. to people who have been misinformed. > "whats the point of this?" That should be obvious from reading and comprehending the paste I mentioned. I also have a justice paste. Below are the first two paragraphs (there's a third, but admittedly it contains some perhaps-overly-strong judgments of mine). Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. That is why perpetration of such violence against one or more others should be considered severely criminal behavior. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence.

>>53356 > to your credit your one of the few people that ive noticed even when you have a window to sell some larger point or say something inflammatory you actually dont you stick to the topic your presenting That's called not being distracted by irrelevancies, aka red herrings. > it seems like I think your trying to make a larger point other than the reasonable one you are making Again, my justice paste contains some perhaps-overly-strong judgments of mine. The decadence paste is very new by comparison, so perhaps it needs to cover more ground to be a sufficient substitute for the older paste. (Although I'm not sure yet that I want it to replace the older one. Time will tell whether it'll replace or complement.) > Like I always think you are trying to stretch at something and you arent you just are stating there is physical safety limitations to how intense of anal play you can engage with. Yes, and there is more to it than that. I'm not "trying to stretch at something." Both the decadence paste and the justice paste make explicit judgments. As I wrote recently in another (now deleted) thread: > I'm not trying to tell people how to live. I do make judgments of some violent people harming others—especially those who inspire countless viewers—among other judgments, but ultimately this is not about me nor my judgments. Societies worldwide may eventually see things the way I do when the consequences of those factors facilitating rampant anorectal violence become impossible to ignore.

You come off as a propagandist. If you strongly believe something is wrong with society and that you're the only hero this world needs, make and publish your original life's work about it and don't just make a compilation cherry-picked about "how anon should X and Y, not Z" repeatedly, I could even think of worse things that most people overlook, you can even just round off your argument to the little thing called (playful or not) violence/abuse and now the lines blur and throw in a little bit of gender specifics. The more you do this "X and Y, not Z" format, the more you come off as spamming propaganda. Repeating also counts as brainwashing, no one likes to see soykaf being spammed all over and over again, that's how ad companies train people with weaker neuroplasticity (middle-aged+) to be entrained with remembering to consume their products, even worse is they employ subliminal brainwashing techniques and other stuff I cannot talk about. Repetition is boring and disgusting to brilliant minds. I wouldn't complain if it's the last time I ever see your "message" but hopefully that would be when you truly have something new to offer (which is more interesting). Anyway that is just me, you can keep on disagreeing to those who do, at least you should know it's not easy to win over some people's minds, that's why you should pick a "better" crowd "if I were you." Make a sect, a cult, but don't expect anyone to open doors for you.

>>53361 > You come off as a propagandist. 1. I don't care. Again: ultimately this is not about me nor my judgments. It's also not about my obsession. Yes, I have one; I don't deny that. I blame my strongest fetish, without which I probably would be much worse off today. 2. So do you, quite frankly: You come across as someone who has an agenda (perhaps a nefarious one) barring serious reading comprehension issues. You seem to be either purposely ignoring or not understanding significant portions of what I've written (you're still trying to make this about me, for example, rather than focusing on much more important matters about which I've been trying to raise awareness and catalyze action). > If you strongly believe [...] that you're the only hero this world needs I don't. > a compilation That's a compilation of _material from others_ (sometimes with clarifications added by myself). I'm trying to draw attention to their words. I even wrote summaries supported by their words. > no one likes to see soykaf being spammed all over and over again I don't do what I'm doing on lainchan everywhere else that I post this material. When I experience exceptionally hostile/aggressive treatment most especially from mods and/or admins, then I feel free to respond in kind. "Treat others how you wish to be treated," in sum. I have a lot of pent-up frustration from the significant issues to which I've been trying to draw attention for many years largely not being addressed for those many years by serious and effective action on the part of many others. It's nice to take out my frustration sometimes on those whom I feel are deserving. On some chans I started a thread, went through a discussion, and then posted that I would leave the thread (sometimes adding that I may post in it again if someone else bumps it; on some chans a thread of mine sinks to higher-numbered pages and then is pruned). Sometimes I don't even return to those places, or at least I refrain from posting my "anal avenger" material again. Basically, I do not behave the same everywhere. > Make a sect, a cult I'm not looking for an echo chamber nor a filter bubble, thank you. I've posted material trying to draw attention to such places. If you wish to see mass delusion in action, I have plenty of examples of blatantly false/harmful information often rising to the top on the "sex-positive" bias-pushing /r/sex subreddit. There also are (probably many) more places where similar stuff is going on: BS prevailing over facts, essentially. That is why we (as in humanity in general) are in such a terrible situation today with regard to the matters over which I've been crusading for so long — among far too many other matters.