(untitled)

dd bs=1 skip=45349 if="77a8811b25ca067b3f30eb3a24372da0.png" of="embedded.zip"

go away op no one likes you

lol, this guy again.. ( Does anyone knows what's his "b& content" is? Some breitbart-level crap? )

I downloaded the file but it's not called 77a8811b25ca067b3f30eb3a24372da0.png it's called 1637299704087-0.png , so I can't follow your instructions. Please help I need access to this important information.

>>53146 > lol, this guy again.. This is part of it: Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that at least one supposed attribute of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy could be a better angle.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something presented—is another form of red herring. Attacking a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims with no proof provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anoreceptive violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, along with the voluminous amount of information from others, are so much more important than anything about one lone person trying to draw attention to them. Certainly pornography industries would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already utilize them for perpetration of violence against one or more others. > breitbart-level crap? My own writings at the top, some of which are summaries supported by the compilation included at the end of my writings. That compilation consists of quotes from many peer-reviewed medical studies, many medical books, and a few other sources (mainly news articles documenting relevant trends in Trends & Associations along with more peer-reviewed studies).

>>53147 Very funny. I dislike wasting my time writing new material in threads that usually are censored, so I'm done with this for now.