(untitled)

Please address rampant 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 violence & misinformation. Also, please remove the filter for the plain ASCII word "𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅," calling anyone who tries to post something containing it a "spammer." That is rather ridiculous.

>>48898 ... among filters for other words/phrases. Anyway, what I'm working on right now: updating the text supported by Prolapse & Incontinence to note that the internal anal sphincter muscle seems to lack somatic innervation. If that is the case, then damage to it e.g. from anal stretching will elicit no pain sensation. Supporting studies (among others) are below. I'm not providing quotes because I'm not sure which word(s) are triggering the "spammer" response. "Internal anal sphincter parasympathetic-nitrergic and sympathetic-adrenergic innervation: a 3-dimensional morphological and functional analysis." Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2012 Apr; 55(4): 473-81. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318245190e. (PMID 22426273) "Disorders of the pelvic floor and anal sphincters; a gastroenterologist’s perspective." Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2013 Mar; 24(2): 293-298. doi:10.1016/S0716-8640(13)70161-5.

>>48898 Have you considered making a Geocities/HTML-host page? Perhaps with a zipped "press info" or package? Seems a little more efficient than only the kamikaze-imageposts. I don't currently have the bandwidth to interact much with DOI papers directly, and a site/bookmark is easy to file into my reading list and to archive. (archiveteam offers a free "download complete domain to archive.org" service, which I've used in the past.)

>>48898 >>48901 I over read the PDF attachment, but my point that a simple HTML site is more accessible stands. PDF has security weaknesses due to being complex to implement readers for. Browsers are much more hardened and with a plain HTML (no JS especially) site they aren't even necessary to read the page.

>>48901 > Have you considered making a Geocities/HTML-host page? I maintained a web site on a free host many years ago. I have no desire to do so again. The Medical Aspects Of Anal Sex 20080609: https://web.archive.org/web/20080609040506/http://damon4.bravehost.com/ (earliest version archived: 20080227) > Seems a little more efficient than only the kamikaze-imageposts. I disagree. When I post an image, I can provide a variant with a URL to a pastebin site containing the references compilation as plaintext. Of course, some people might think that makes me look like a spammer (even though I'm not affiliated with any pastebin site and gain nothing from referrals/views), which is why I provided the PDF instead at least here. > I don't currently have the bandwidth to interact much with DOI papers directly, I suggest supporting Sci-Hub (no affiliation). You can prefix a DOI with https://sci-hub.se/ and Sci-Hub may have the study (although sometimes it's a pre-publication manuscript). Note that there may be more than one top-level domain, and sometimes they disappear; the big publishers are not exactly supportive of Sci-Hub nor its founder. See for example these Hacker News links: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27939043 (Sci-Hub Twitter account suspended) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27781701 (How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27730843 (Is Alexandra Elbakyan [Sci-Hub's founder] in real trouble this time?)

Moved to >>>/q/10479.