Do something. NOW.

>hxxps://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know (2019/11/12) > Anal sex, like any kind of sex, can be perfectly safe if you take the correct precautions. "Perfectly" safe? Riiiight. Never mind that "the correct precautions" are utterly unrealistic (especially if the standard is "PERFECTLY" safe)... 4chan /gif/thread/9488931 28 Oct 2016 23:47:57 No.9514792 https://desuarchive.org/gif/thread/9488931/#9514792 (Quoting myself) > At best, anal sex and significant anal-insertive activities accelerate or guarantee the development of 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 health problems. That could in theory be untrue if [such] activities are done with ridiculously excessive care* all the time, every time. * That includes, but is not limited to: ruling out preexisting 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 conditions (possibly caused by prior sexual trauma), always using lubricant, avoiding lubricants that irritate/damage the rectal lining, avoiding enemas (all enemas, hyperosmolar or otherwise, probably remove the rectum's protective mucus barrier), always using a condom (particularly in the absence of an enema), never thrusting too rapidly ("too rapid" could vary for different people, at least for the anal tissues), never inserting anything too girthy ("too girthy" also could vary), never using numbing agents (pain indicates that something is wrong -- anally, but not rectally), etc. In practice using ridiculously excessive care is unrealistic -- it'd be more of a chore than a pleasure. Furthermore, both ignorance and misinformation are rampant, porn sets a very bad example that some viewers get ideas from, and people with [self-]destructive tendencies are having a field day.

Concerning widespread misinformation, here are some more examples (there may be more in the referenced articles): >hxxps://badgirlsbible.com/is-anal-sex-safe (2020/11/20) > Typically, people run into trouble with anal sex when they don’t listen to their body’s cues. We’re specifically talking about pain, which lets you know whether you’re doing anal sex safely. As pointed out in the traumatic risks summary, not far inside there is delicate tissue that elicits no pain sensation when damaged. >hxxps://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a17749/anal-sex-misconceptions/ (2020/08/18) > There isn’t enough clear evidence from doctors and researchers that fecal incontinence is a true long-term risk of anal sex, says King. Fecal incontinence is both a short-term and a long-term risk of anoreceptive activities: See the Prolapse & Incontinence summary along with plenty of material in other parts of the referenced compilation pertaining to anal dilatation/stretching, and this study in particular for one example of short-term risk: "Complete anal sphincter complex disruption from intercourse: A case report and literature review." >hxxps://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/teens/ask-experts/can-anal-sex-have-any-long-term-effects-on-my-body-ive-heard-that-it-can-cause-anal-leakage-later-in-life-and-anal-prolapse-is-this-true (2020/04/24) > Anal sex is perfectly healthy and safe in both the long and short term. I shouldn't even need to comment on that blatant bs. >hxxps://squirrelmunk.com/2017/10/13/so-you-wanna-get-your-butt-fuarrrked/ This is an article promoting anal stretching. That is not a good idea; plenty of medical sources cited in the compilation explain why.

Yet more examples of misinformation (at best; disinformation is also a possibility — intent is the differentiating factor): >hxxps://goop.com/wellness/sexual-health/reality-check-anal-sex/ (2017/03/23; updated 2020/01/06) > Q: Does the popularity of anal in porn reflect reality in both homosexual and heterosexual couples? A: No. Wrong answer: See the trends documented in Trends & Associations, particularly many people being inspired by and emulating what they see in pornography along with pornography even being used as a primary source of sexual education. Furthermore, that article has a few questions about the health risks, and the answers are sorely lacking. >hxxps://www.vice.com/en/article/xdw4q4/does-anal-sex-do-longterm-damage (2016/11/17) > Significant physical trauma due to anal eroticism is rare [...] there isn't really any evidence that anal sex is likely to damage the anus.​ I hope that I don't need to point out why those statements are blatant bs. >hxxps://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-anal-sex (2016/08/18) > [Question] Is there a downside to only doing anal? [Answer] [...] there's not really a downside to doing it all the time. > [Question] Can you do it too much and stretch it out? [Answer] [...] There's a myth that you can stretch the anus, it doesn't work that way. It's actually relaxing the anus. [...] In fact, a lot of people say anal sex is a great way to prevent [hemorrhoids] because the area is much more relaxed. I can say the same for those claims. >hxxps://www.elitedaily.com/dating/anal-sex-beginners/1445771 (2016/04/06) > When having anal sex for the first time, he needs to start slowly as he is entering your anus. He can speed up later Rapid thrusting is always a bad idea.

Rampant 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 violence is perhaps one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today. Rationale: • Due to its ubiquity in pornography, several generations have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and engaging in violent behavior that should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved. Perpetrators of such violence against one or more others going unpunished is a serious problem; those who inspired countless viewers should be punished severely AND SHOWN TO BE. Unfortunately, in many cases this may be out of governments' hands due to the passage of time, relocation, etc. Therefore dispensing justice by ANY means necessary without government involvement is the only realistic solution in far too many cases. • Widespread ignorance—especially _willful_ ignorance—and apathy about 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. Again, that unrestrained hedonism is contributing to societal decay, probably very significantly. Since so many people don't wish to think about, much less seriously discuss 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 matters, rampant 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 violence "flies under the radar;" people would rather focus on some other kind of erotic abuse which may not even be anywhere near as dangerous. • Given the widespread ignorance about what an anus is supposed to look like, it's often the preferred target of people who like to disfigure body parts. Although the anus is one of our most important body parts, typically it is not valued very highly, and it commonly is denigrated and intentionally abused (treated in a harmful/injurious manner). That abuse is tolerated, or at least ignored, by far too many people. The vast majority of humanity may never care much at least about another person's anus, meaning that discouraging erotic anoreceptive activities entirely is likely to be the only viable solution.

>>48590 Did it again. Blatantly injurious erotic 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. Hence, when more than one person is involved such violence should constitute a severe crime for any penetrative person. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. This is happening because the vast majority of humanity likely never will place a high value upon the good health of at least someone else's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 matters even though the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓵 violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Criminal justice has not been served in far too many cases, and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. People worldwide who are or were in a government position with jurisdiction to uphold that justice yet failed must be held accountable as well.

These people, among many others, need to die: • Rocco Siffredi, plus many more violent criminals like him who perpetrated brutal anorectal violence against many others • John Stagliano, along with many other criminals like him involved in Evil Angel and similar companies worldwide (LegalPorno springs to mind): anyone doing one or more of aiding and abetting violent criminals, profiting from their crimes, and directing their actions • Kamala Harris, California's Attorney General for many years: Did she do _anything whatsoever_ to rein in California's out-of-control pornography industry? It doesn't seem so. • Xavier Becerra, another former California AG (now heading the U.S. DHHS, which oversees the NIH, despite having no public health nor medical background); Gavin Newsom, California's current governor; and Jerry Brown, California's former governor: See above. • Anyone who was involved in the 2008 obscenity prosecution idiocy against Evil Angel, which just made things worse — and I wouldn't put it past the likes of the George W. Bush administration to have desired such an effect. Who in the FBI was involved? Who was involved at higher levels, up to and possibly including Bush & Cheney? They all need to die. • Stephanie Dunn (California & Maine), one administrator of AdultDVDTalk (username "Janitor," formerly "Steph"): aiding and abetting violent criminals and their crimes (and likely profiting from them as well) • "Flash," a 'moderator' of AdultDVDTalk: image related

>>48592 Obama's birthday party should have made it abundantly clear that the U.S. political elite/oligarchy are in Hollywood's pocket. 4chan /gif/thread/12681826 05 May 2018 12:29:55 No.12681928 > Rocco The sooner that he--and too many other abusive criminals like him who have inspired countless others--is killed in a very gruesome, prolonged, and most _fitting_ manner for his violent crimes, the better off the entire world will be. Governments have failed at delivering justice. Sadly, "fighting fire with fire" is the only avenue left for anything even remotely approaching just punishment, and must involve elimination of corrupt government officials past and present--along with any "obstacles" that get in the way. It's truly a shame that [former California governor] Jerry Brown is so commendable on environmental issues. It's very unlikely that he is unaware of the violent and blatantly criminal activities that have been going on for so many years in one of his state's most profitable industries. Either way, though, he has obviously failed and deserves to die along with plenty of others in California's government who also failed. It's likely that Hollywood has close ties to CA's pornography industry as well. It can not be emphasized strongly enough that bloodshed is necessary. FYI: Stephanie "Janitor" Dunn, one administrator of AdultDVDTalk, lives/lived in Maine. She deserves to die for criminal aiding and abetting, not to mention allowing a post-doctoring, porn-𝓼𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓰 moderator known as "Flash" to have free reign.

>>48593 https://nypost.com/2021/08/07/obama-plays-golf-as-pelosi-flies-in-for-marthas-vineyard-party/ Obama plays golf ahead of star-studded Martha’s Vineyard party — that Pelosi isn’t attending (2021/08/07) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/obama-60th-birthday-party-marthas-vineyard_n_610ea670e4b06253fa4fcd71 Barack Obama's Scaled-Down Birthday Bash Still Has A Lot Of Celebs (2021/08/07) https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-birthday-party-scaled-back-photos Internet reactions to photos of Obama's supposed 'scaled back' birthday bash boasting massive tents for celebrities: 'Do you feel like a peasant yet?' (2021/08/07)

"The White House will call on OPEC and its oil-producing allies to boost production in an effort to combat climbing gasoline prices, amid concerns that rising inflation could derail the economic recovery from Covid-19." https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/11/as-gas-prices-rise-white-house-says-opec-action-is-simply-not-enough-calls-for-ftc-scrutiny.html So soon after the IPCC climate change report? Really? John Kerry, where are you? Bueller? Yeah, I'm pissed off right now. I'll be back to repost the same material later following the inevitable censorship.