Address rampant anorectal violence & misinformation!

𝖡𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾—𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗂𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗁, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾𝖽 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇—𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽𝗐𝗂𝖽𝖾, 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗐𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽 (𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖿𝗎𝗅) 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗁𝗒, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖨𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌/𝖼𝗁𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖼/𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗁 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗈𝗇 𝖽𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗁𝗒𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗒 [𝖱𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌: 𝖠𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖱𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗌 𝟣-𝟥]. 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇 𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇. 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖿𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝗇 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝖾𝗋𝗌: 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗌𝖾𝖾, 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇; 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗌𝗎𝖿𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀; 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗉𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗒: 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋, 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗌 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗉𝗌𝗒𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗁𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗌 [𝖱𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌: 𝖳𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗌 & 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌]. 𝖯𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝖾𝗅𝖽 𝖽𝖺𝗒 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗎𝗇𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝗁𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆 𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾.

post all your png's, so can spam them to the normals

>>47661 Perhaps I'll upload them to a file host shortly then archive them for good measure.

>>47663 I've done that, but posting the six archived URLs can't get past Lainchan's spam filter. Since this thread is still here, I won't push my luck. Maybe next time.

>>47666 As awkward as this subject is, it's necessary work, because modern people are retarded enough to question basic concepts like harmful behavior. Anyway, I hope I can find your files somewhere, because they support my lifestyle theory. Good work, Lain.

>>47672 Thank you. It's refreshing to find someone who (apparently) feels that way; it seems to me that not many people do. In an ideal world this "crusade" of mine would be entirely unnecessary. Yet here I am, 13+ years after I started, still going with no apparent and significant positive change of which to speak. I am hesitant to post the individual images from the compilation, because it seems to me that that may have catalyzed thread deletion when I did so before. All of them currently are present in the following thread; they have been archived along with the thread itself: https://crystal.cafe/nsfw/res/5009.html

>>47695 OP, would you be willing to do an interview on this topic? Do you have any contact details where you can be reached?

>>47699 Refer to the text covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics included in the OP image. On that note, I will discuss nothing more about myself in this thread. As I noted previously, I am not significant; I am merely one lone and very fed-up individual. There are plenty of actually significant matters to focus on here, not to mention a large amount of information from others and summaries/writings supported by that information.

>>47703 What? I'm trying to get an interview so I can understand this topic better and help you potentially reach a larger audience with it.

https://youtu.be/R2AMq6Nclg8

.please watch https://youtu.be/R2AMq6Nclg8

>>47704 > I'm trying to get an interview so I can understand this topic better 1. Which topic? There are numerous topics. 2. There are many people you could interview to understand the covered topics better. The compilation should provide plenty of leads for that purpose: authors of the cited news articles, medical studies, medical books, ... > help you potentially reach a larger audience Help the people who produced the information that was referenced to reach a larger audience. If there is something you feel deserves more attention, then act like a good journalist: investigate those primary sources yourself, and spread the information based on your acquired understanding. Don't rely on any secondary source summarizing from one or more primary sources. Even if a secondary source's summarization is 100% accurate, it's better to be well-acquainted with source material yourself: You can better understand the topics involved, seek out more sources, and make your own summaries if desired.

>>47704 if you have a pre-existing audience you should mention that, then in the private interview negotiation you can expand on that without doxxing yourself.

>>47708 To be honest, I'd like to interview you about what got you into these topics as well. You understand that as a very niche subject, people are curious as to why they should care about it, and what leads someone to advocate for it. Simply dumping medical information on a topic which the vast majority of people feel is uninteresting and irrelevant, even when summarized, is not enough. >>47709 It's a fairly small audience.

>>47710 > I'd like to interview you about what got you into these topics as well. 1. You are focusing on something that does not matter. 2. You are ignoring what was written, not only in the OP but also in other posts. 3. Frankly, you come across as a potential glower or maybe someone intentionally trying to derail the thread. The material in the OP image, and even more significantly the referenced compilation, should be more than sufficient. If anyone would like more sources covering one or more relevant topics, feel free to ask. There is much more out there than what was included in the latest compilation. Additional digging has already been done, and more can be done. Of course, no guarantees can be given, and inappropriate questions will be ignored (e.g., seeking professional advice on some personal issue should be taken up with a domain practitioner).

>>47712 1. You're saying I shouldn't be examining you, but rather the source material. None of these sources contain a call to arms against any particular behavior - e.g. documenting the effects of smoking doesn't mean the author is necessarily against the rights of others to smoke, or isn't a smoker himself. While certain behaviour may be discouraged, there's no suggestion of banning or censoring it. Clearly the source authors don't find this topic to be urgent, otherwise they would publicly be campaigning against it, as they do against climate change, child obesity, etc. 2. In the absence of such campaigning and from a purely practical standpoint, why don't you, yourself, start a centralized blog, site, or channel about this topic instead of relying on random anonymous forums, which are an inefficient way of transmitting and preserving information?

>>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟣𝟧 > 𝖸𝗈𝗎'𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖨 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽𝗇'𝗍 𝖻𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗒𝗈𝗎, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗑𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗅𝗒. > 𝖭𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖻𝖾𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾. 𝖲𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽/𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 (𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇) 𝖺𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝗅𝗅 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝗌. > 𝖶𝗁𝗂𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝖻𝖾𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝖽, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗍. 𝟣. 𝖮𝗇𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗅𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗇 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉. 𝟤. 𝖨𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖻𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍'𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗒𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗋𝗌. 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗉𝖾 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌; 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗉 𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌). 𝟥. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌, 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 (𝗐𝗁𝗂𝖼𝗁 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗍 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝗂𝗌𝗁 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌𝗅𝗒 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒, 𝗉𝗁𝗒𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗒, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗁), 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗍, 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌—𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾—𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 (𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒) 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾, 𝖾𝗍𝖼. > 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗇'𝗍 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗉𝗂𝖼 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍, 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗐𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗅𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍 𝗂𝗍 𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗌. 𝖱𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌, 𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝟣) 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖾𝖿𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝟤) 𝖻𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗀𝗈𝗈𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈, 𝗂𝖿 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗍 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾 (𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗇, 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾).

>>47719 The bulky text is due to one or more words in the post being flagged as spam. Annoying.

>>47719 >𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 (𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇) 𝖺𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝗅𝗅 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝗌 What people are attempting to do exactly what about this? Where's the awareness and outrage? Here's one example. Sometimes people imitate dumb soykaf they've seen in porn - they stick it up their girlfriend's pooper without lube, it hurts, they usually don't try again. It's something embarassing that could've been avoided with basic sex education. But it's this is neither a life-changing mistake, a trendy teen craze, nor a global health emergency. Hospital waiting rooms rarely ever get people with wrecked assholes, and if they do, it's almost always because someone took a huge shıt and it gave them a hemorrhoid. If it's becase of some sex toy, it's because the patient it got lost up his intestine and they have to fish it out. So why not address ass problems which actually commonly affect people, such as diet, bowel movements, and hemorrhoids? >𝖮𝗇𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗅𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗇 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉. One article just touching on it? Yet you're talking about it as if it's comparable to videos of shootings, beheadings, and snuff. >𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌—𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾—𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 (𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒) 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾, 𝖾𝗍𝖼. If someone chooses to put a fire extinguisher up their ass and upload it online, that's their choice to do so, and their ass will likely still work fine because the anus is a flexible muscle. If someone watches that, or accidently sticks a finger up their pooper while wiping, chances are they're not gonna to move on to inserting watermelons or small family automobiles up their ass. And even if they do, it's their body and their choice. It's not comparable to uploading instructions on how to cook hard drugs, suffocate yourself to pass out, or something equally dangerous to one's health. None of this "ass violence" is common, nor defined as such - if someone raped someone, in the eyes of the law it doesn't really matter which back hole they got screwed in, what matters is that it was non-consensual. If someone signs a contract to participate in a porn video where they get DP-ed or kicked in the balls, chances are they've done it before, they're probably into it, and they know what they're getting into. Everyone participating in the video is compensated and in agreement. Calling for the death of professional dick-slingers and dick-recipients (like you've previously done) is insane. Why not call for the death of BDSM nipple abusers as well - surely it damages mammary glands which are important for feeding babies? Why not address vaginal stretching too? But if the video participants were lied to or coerced into participating, then this goes into criminal exploitation or human trafficking. Which exact hole they got screwed in doesn't really matter at that point. >𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗌. What reasons? Surely at least someone should be raising awareness on this topic, right? Why not raise awareness against rape, exploitation in poor communities and in the porn industry, and human trafficking instead? Sore buttholes are not the issue here.

>>47703 > I will discuss nothing more about myself in this thread. Sigh, okay, making that statement is not the greatest idea, so I rescind it. In an ideal world it would be fine, but this world is far from ideal; deceitful people exist, and refraining from refuting some claims is just too much to expect. >>47726 > Calling for the death of [ANY] dick-recipients (like you've previously done) is insane. I have never done that. You are full of soykaf. Anyway: 1. It's rather obvious that either you haven't read, or you are purposely ignoring what is written in those cited news articles and studies that are included in Trends & Associations, not to mention what was written in the OP (the image and the text). Furthermore, you evidently have not read (or are ignoring) what was included in the rest of the compilation. You have made many blatantly false statements that are easily disproven just by reading through what I've referenced. 2. You have introduced many red herrings, including one that was pointed out as an example in the text on logically-fallacious diversionary tactics included the OP image: "A red herring logical fallacy is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. One _very_ common example is trying to create an irrelevant discussion about a messenger/claimant (often by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions)." 3. You have introduced at least one misrepresentation (this is not merely about "sore buttholes"). Based on that alone, it sure seems as if you have a nefarious agenda / deceitful tendencies. That is not irrelevant when you appear to be purposely posting disinformation, contradicting plenty of evidence from others that was provided while offering no supporting sources whatsoever for your contrary claims. Also from the text on logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: "The burden of proof rests on the claimant." "Deceit and manipulation characterize their interpersonal relationships." https://web.archive.org/web/20171002164816/http://www.minddisorders.com/A-Br/Antisocial-personality-disorder.html If someone asks, then I will provide a point-by-point refutation with quotes from referenced sources. That would be a huge waste of time and might require several additional posts however.

>>47730 >> Calling for the death of [ANY] dick-recipients (like you've previously done) is insane. >I have never done that. You are full of soykaf. If I'm full of shıt, then you're the Ganges river: https://archive.is/OpmeR https://archive.is/WNnBs >Fair warning: Assuming that this thread will be censored as several previous ones were, posting a hit list is planned for the next thread. As promised: >These people, among many others, need to die: That's you, two months apart, on at least two websites (including this one), posting hit lists and calling for the death of porn actors, politicians, forum moderators, and probably the fuсking pope as well, because they didn't kneel to your schizophrenic anus crusade. Mods, there's probably no reason to delete this thread at this point - he'll just make a new one. Let this deluded pest's testimony remain here.

>>47738 >inb4 "But I wished death on the porn actor who was ramming his pecker into the butthole, not the person whose butthole he was ramming it into" What fuсking planet are you on? Uranus? (lol) Why shouldn't the butthole's owner be complicit in this as well? Isn't he/she more guilty than Kamala Harris and Dick fuсking Cheney? I implore you to start picketing about this in your neighborhood to see what people's reaction is. In fact, start walking around outside with a sign that says "KAMALA HARRIS ANUS CONSPIRACY" and just leave the Internet alone.

>>47738 1. I have never called for the death of anyone because of any receptive activity in which they engaged. 2. I do not deny that I have advocated for justice by any means necessary. Justice has not been served in far too many cases — and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. That is why it is important to hold accountable politicians who were in a position to rein in an out-of-control pornography industry over which they had jurisdiction and yet failed. They failed to prosecute a) perpetrators of significant violence against one or more others who inspired countless viewers, along with b) anyone doing one or more of aiding and abetting those violent criminals, profiting from their crimes, and directing their actions (e.g. corporate executives and directors). 3. Once again, ultimately this is not about me. > I'm full of shıt Yes, you are: >>47726 > What people are attempting to do exactly what about this? Where's the awareness and outrage? "Across Australia schools are bringing in specialist speakers to educate the kids on the perils of porn, and preach a message of safe sex. What they're hearing, however, isn't just that porn is leading to unrealistic expectations of sex, but that we're now facing a far more dangerous situation. Susan McLean is a cyber safety expert who advises the federal government and tours schools. The former police officer is one of several experts who have told the ABC they are hearing an increasing number of reports of high school girls sustaining serious injuries trying to replicate things they or their boyfriend have seen in porn." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-16/australias-porn-problem/10668940

>>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟥𝟪 𝟣. 𝖨 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗁 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗂𝗇 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝖼𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗀𝖾𝖽. 𝟤. 𝖨 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖨 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝖻𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗒. 𝖩𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝖿𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌 — 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗍 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌' 𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝖽. 𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗒 𝗂𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗇 𝗈𝗎𝗍-𝗈𝖿-𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝖼𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝖽 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗒𝖾𝗍 𝖿𝖺𝗂𝗅𝖾𝖽. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖿𝖺𝗂𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖾 𝖺) 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝖾𝗋𝗌, 𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖻) 𝖺𝗇𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗌, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 (𝖾.𝗀. 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌). 𝟥. 𝖮𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇, 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗆𝖾. > 𝖨'𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗅𝗅 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗁ı𝗍 𝖸𝖾𝗌, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾: >>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟤𝟨 > 𝖶𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌? 𝖶𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾? "𝖠𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌 𝖠𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗅𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗄𝗂𝖽𝗌 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝖺𝖿𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑. 𝖶𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗋𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝗁𝗈𝗐𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝗂𝗌𝗇'𝗍 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝖾𝗑, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗐𝖾'𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖲𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗇 𝖬𝖼𝖫𝖾𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗒𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗒 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗌 𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗅𝗌. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖠𝖡𝖢 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝖿 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗁𝗂𝗀𝗁 𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗅 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖻𝗈𝗒𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇." ... "𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖱𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖱𝗂𝗌𝗄 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝟫𝟢 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝗈𝗒𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝟨𝟢 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇. 𝖠𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝟪𝟪 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗁𝗒𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗀𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗍 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗍 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁 𝖻𝗒 𝖱𝖬𝖨𝖳 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖬𝖾𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇 𝖳𝗒𝗅𝖾𝗋, 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗌 — 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝗒 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖴𝖲 — 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍. “𝖠 𝗅𝗈𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗌𝖺𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗌,” 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽. “𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗍'𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖽, 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟢𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗒 𝗆𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆. 𝖲𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗎𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 ... 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝗅𝗅.”" "𝖳𝖺𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇 𝖦𝖯 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋 𝖱𝗈𝗒𝖺𝗅 𝖠𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇 𝖢𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖦𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖯𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍, 𝖡𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗇 𝖲𝖾𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗅, 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌, 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗌𝗅𝗒 𝗐𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀. 𝖧𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇'𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗄 𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗍 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗀𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍. 𝖡𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗎𝖻𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗑, 𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽. “𝖨𝗍'𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗈𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗈𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒,” 𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽. “𝖶𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾. 𝖨'𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇, 𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍'𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇.”" "𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖻𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗅” 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝖽 𝖬𝗌 𝖬𝖼𝖫𝖾𝖺𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗐𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇'𝗍 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. “𝖨 𝖽𝗈𝗇'𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌, 𝗐𝗁𝗂𝖼𝗁 𝖨 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗒 𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖾,” 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽." 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝗐𝗐𝗐.𝖺𝖻𝖼.𝗇𝖾𝗍.𝖺𝗎/𝗇𝖾𝗐𝗌/𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟫-𝟢𝟣-𝟣𝟨/𝖺𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌-𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇-𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆/𝟣𝟢𝟨𝟨𝟪𝟫𝟦𝟢

>>47745 Accidental duplicate. Sorry. Lainchan's spam filter is extremely annoying when I want to quote articles and studies directly. >>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟤𝟨 > 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗆𝖻 𝗌𝗈𝗒𝗄𝖺𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 - 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗄 𝗂𝗍 𝗎𝗉 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽'𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗅𝗎𝖻𝖾, 𝗂𝗍 𝗁𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝖽𝗈𝗇'𝗍 𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇. 𝖨𝗍'𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽'𝗏𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖼 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. > 𝖭𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 "𝖺𝗌𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾" 𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗈𝗇 "𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖠𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝖽 𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖿𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖸𝖾𝗍, 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖽𝗒𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗌: 𝖶𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅-𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇? 𝖢𝗈𝗀𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗈𝗋𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇-𝗆𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝖽𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝖾𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌. 𝖶𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌. 𝖳𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌, 𝗐𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗒𝖾𝖽 𝟦𝟪𝟩 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇 (𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗌 𝟣𝟪-𝟤𝟫 𝗒𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗌) 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗌. 𝖱𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗌 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝗐𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗍 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝖾𝗑, 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗂𝖼 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗇𝖾𝗋, [𝖺𝗇𝖽] 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗅[...]." "𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖲𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖲𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗍: 𝖠𝗇 𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗒𝗌𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖲𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖱𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌." 𝖠𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖲𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝖾𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗋. 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟨 𝖬𝖺𝗒; 𝟦𝟧(𝟦): 𝟫𝟪𝟥-𝟫𝟦. 𝖯𝖬𝖨𝖣 𝟤𝟧𝟦𝟨𝟨𝟤𝟥𝟥. 𝖽𝗈𝗂:𝟣𝟢.𝟣𝟢𝟢𝟩/𝗌𝟣𝟢𝟧𝟢𝟪-𝟢𝟣𝟦-𝟢𝟥𝟫𝟣-𝟤. "𝖤𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗒 𝗍𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗌𝖾𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 “𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝗌𝖾𝗑”. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗍’𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗄 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗍 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇." ... "𝖠𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖱𝗂𝗌𝗄, 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝟫𝟢 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝗈𝗒𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝟨𝟢 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾. 𝖮𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝟪𝟪 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗁𝗒𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗀𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇." ... "𝖠𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗇 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗆𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖳𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁 𝗂𝗇 𝖫𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇, 𝗐𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗒𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖻𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 “𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗒 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋”. 𝖲𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽 𝖺 𝖦𝖯 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗄𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝗈𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗑 “𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒) 𝗐𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗋 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒) 𝖾𝗇𝗃𝗈𝗒𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗍 — 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗒 — 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗒 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖾𝖽 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆) 𝗍𝗈”." ... "[𝖣𝗋 𝖬𝖾𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇 𝖳𝗒𝗅𝖾𝗋, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐 𝖺𝗍 𝖱𝖬𝖨𝖳 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗒] 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝗌 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖿𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒’𝗋𝖾 “𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾” 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗍’𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 “𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆”. “𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍’𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗍 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇’𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌.”" ... "𝖣𝗋 𝖳𝗒𝗅𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽 𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗄𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗒 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗂𝗍’𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝖽 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒’𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾. “𝖸𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗇’𝗍 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖽𝗈𝖾𝗌𝗇’𝗍 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍,” 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖽. “𝖨 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄 𝗐𝖾’𝗋𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾’𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗂𝗍 (𝖻𝗎𝗍) 𝗐𝖾’𝗋𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗁𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇.”" 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝗐𝗐𝗐.𝗇𝖾𝗐𝗌.𝖼𝗈𝗆.𝖺𝗎/𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗒𝗅𝖾/𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗌/𝗌𝖾𝗑/𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋-𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾-𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗌-𝖺-𝗐𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗐-𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈-𝗍𝗁𝖾-𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽-𝗈𝖿-𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾𝖽-𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀-𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇-𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾/𝗇𝖾𝗐𝗌-𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒/𝖿𝟩𝖽𝟪𝟥𝖺𝟨𝟪𝖼𝟦𝟪𝖾𝟥𝟩𝟪𝟢𝟤𝟩𝟦𝟥𝟢𝖿𝖽𝟪𝖾𝟫𝟥𝖽𝖺𝟥𝟦𝟫 (𝖩𝗎𝗇𝖾 𝟢𝟤, 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟧) "𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝗈𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗅, 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗒 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗏𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇. 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 ‘𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇’ 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗑, 𝗒𝖾𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗂𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝖻𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍. 𝖮𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗄𝖾𝗒 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗆𝖾𝗇; 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 ‘𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝗂𝗍 𝗂𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗍’ (𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝖻𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇); 𝖺𝗇𝖽, 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒, 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 ‘𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅’ 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖨𝗍 𝗌𝖾𝖾𝗆𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗎𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗌." "𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗑 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗁 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇: 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗒 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖴𝖪." 𝖡𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗁 𝖬𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖩𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖮𝗉𝖾𝗇. 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟦 𝖩𝗎𝗅 𝟣𝟪; 𝟦(𝟪): 𝖾𝟢𝟢𝟦𝟫𝟫𝟨. 𝖯𝖬𝖢𝟦𝟣𝟧𝟨𝟪𝟣𝟢. 𝖽𝗈𝗂:𝟣𝟢.𝟣𝟣𝟥𝟨/𝖻𝗆𝗃𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗇-𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟦-𝟢𝟢𝟦𝟫𝟫𝟨.

>>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟤𝟨 > 𝖨𝖿 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝗍 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗉 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗎𝗉𝗅𝗈𝖺𝖽 𝗂𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾, 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍'𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗑𝗂𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾. "𝖠𝗇𝗒 𝖻𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗄 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗀𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗇 𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒. 𝖤𝗑𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗂𝖼 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇. 𝖠𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋. 𝖠 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖽 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇." ... "𝖤𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖻𝗒 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾. 𝖬𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖽, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗁𝖺𝗅𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖨𝗇 𝟥𝟤 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝟨𝟧% 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝟣𝟤.𝟧%. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒, 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗄. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗋𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗉 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾. 𝖤𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗂𝖾𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝖾𝗇, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗋 [𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅] 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖽." "𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗒 𝗂𝗇 𝖿𝖺𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾." 𝖦𝗎𝗍. 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟧 𝖩𝗎𝗅; 𝟥𝟩(𝟣): 𝟦-𝟨. 𝖯𝖬𝖢𝟣𝟥𝟪𝟤𝟩𝟧𝟪. 𝖽𝗈𝗂:𝟣𝟢.𝟣𝟣𝟥𝟨/𝗀𝗎𝗍.𝟥𝟩.𝟣.𝟦. "𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝖽. 𝖱𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗁𝗂𝖼 𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌." "𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖲𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖥𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖥𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖫𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖲𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖥𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾." 𝖠𝗇𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖲𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗒. 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟧 𝖠𝗎𝗀𝗎𝗌𝗍; 𝟤𝟦𝟤(𝟤): 𝟤𝟢𝟪-𝟤𝟣𝟣. 𝖯𝖬𝖢𝟣𝟥𝟧𝟩𝟩𝟤𝟨. 𝖽𝗈𝗂:𝟣𝟢.𝟣𝟢𝟫𝟩/𝟢𝟣.𝗌𝗅𝖺.𝟢𝟢𝟢𝟢𝟣𝟩𝟣𝟢𝟥𝟨.𝟥𝟫𝟪𝟪𝟨.𝖿𝖺. "𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆. 𝖯𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗒𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖿𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗐𝖾𝖺𝗄 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌; 𝗁𝗈𝗐𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗁-𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾𝖽." ... "𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗌. 𝖤𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍𝗒-𝖿𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝟫% 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝗍𝗈 ≥𝟤 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝟥 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑. 𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖾𝗓𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗓𝖾 (𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗁-𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖾) 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗌. 𝖨𝗇 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖾𝗓𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒 𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗌 𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗍 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗓𝖾 (𝖺𝖻𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗁-𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇)." "𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗁-𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖽𝗒𝗌𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗐𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖿𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾." 𝖣𝗂𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖢𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖱𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝗆. 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟥 𝖭𝗈𝗏; 𝟧𝟨(𝟣𝟣): 𝟣𝟤𝟪𝟤-𝟫. 𝖯𝖬𝖨𝖣 𝟤𝟦𝟣𝟢𝟧𝟢𝟢𝟦. 𝖽𝗈𝗂:𝟣𝟢.𝟣𝟢𝟫𝟩/𝖽𝖼𝗋.𝟢𝖻𝟢𝟣𝟥𝖾𝟥𝟣𝟪𝟤𝖺𝟣𝟪𝖾𝟪𝟩.

>>𝟦𝟩𝟩𝟤𝟨 > 𝖨𝖿 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗀𝖾𝗍 𝖣𝖯-𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗋 𝗄𝗂𝖼𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗌, 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗂𝗍 𝖻𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝖺𝖻𝗅𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗍, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗄𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗋𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝟣. 𝖶𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 "𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗄𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒'𝗋𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈?" 𝟤. 𝖥𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝗌𝖾𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾: 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾.𝗈𝗋𝗀/𝗀𝗂𝖿/𝗍𝗁𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽/𝟪𝟤𝟩𝟪𝟪𝟪𝟥/#𝟪𝟥𝟥𝟥𝟧𝟥𝟨 𝟦𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇 /𝗀𝗂𝖿/𝗍𝗁𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽/𝟪𝟤𝟩𝟪𝟪𝟪𝟥 𝟥𝟢 𝖬𝖺𝗋 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟨 𝟤𝟢:𝟢𝟤:𝟣𝟧 𝖭𝗈.𝟪𝟥𝟥𝟥𝟧𝟥𝟨 (𝖰𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝟪𝟥𝟣𝟪𝟫𝟢𝟫) 𝖨𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗌--𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗌--𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅-𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗃𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽𝗇'𝗍 𝖻𝖾 𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗂𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗄𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝖽. > 𝖠𝖼𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝗇. 𝖢𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗄𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝖼𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽𝗇'𝗍 𝖻𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝗒 "𝗂𝗍 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍!" 𝖦𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗄 𝗈𝖿 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗄𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾. 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾.𝗈𝗋𝗀/𝗋𝟫𝗄/𝗍𝗁𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽/𝟥𝟢𝟧𝟨𝟨𝟪𝟦𝟤/#𝟥𝟢𝟧𝟩𝟥𝟧𝟫𝟤 𝟦𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇 /𝗋𝟫𝗄/𝗍𝗁𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽/𝟥𝟢𝟧𝟨𝟨𝟪𝟦𝟤 𝟣𝟢 𝖠𝗎𝗀 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟨 𝟢𝟩:𝟦𝟨:𝟢𝟣 𝖭𝗈.𝟥𝟢𝟧𝟩𝟥𝟧𝟫𝟤 (𝖰𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝟥𝟢𝟧𝟩𝟥𝟦𝟤𝟧) 𝖠𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇, 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌𝗇'𝗍 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗆𝖾, 𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗆 𝖨 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗇𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈. 𝖨'𝗆 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗍𝗈𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗈𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗇 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽𝗐𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗅𝖺𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗋 𝖲𝖧𝖮𝖴𝖫𝖣 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝗅𝗒. > 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗍, 𝗍𝗁𝖾[𝗒] 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝖽𝗈 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗐𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖻𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗌. 𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍'𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗒𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌: "𝖺𝗇 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖻𝗈𝖽𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗒." 𝖠𝗅𝗌𝗈, 𝗂𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝖽 (𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖨 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾), 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝖻𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍: 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾[𝟣], 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 "𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾" 𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗄 𝗈𝖿 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗒[𝟤][𝟥] (𝖽𝗎𝖾 𝖾.𝗀. 𝗍𝗈 _𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍_, 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖺𝗒, 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗆, 𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍). 𝟣. 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅 𝖫𝖺𝗐 𝖱𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐, 𝖵𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗆𝖾 𝟪𝟥, 𝖨𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖾 𝟤, 𝖩𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗒 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟪; 𝖯𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾: 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝖫𝖺𝗐 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖥𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝖿 𝖲𝗉𝖾𝖾𝖼𝗁 𝖻𝗒 𝖠𝗅𝖺𝗇 𝖤. 𝖦𝖺𝗋𝖿𝗂𝖾𝗅𝖽. 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉.𝗅𝖺𝗐.𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅.𝖾𝖽𝗎/𝖼𝗀𝗂/𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍.𝖼𝗀𝗂?𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗅𝖾=𝟤𝟩𝟣𝟨&𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍=𝖼𝗅𝗋 (𝖯𝖣𝖥) 𝟤. 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗌.𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗅𝖺𝗐.𝖼𝗈𝗆/𝗅𝖺𝗐_𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾/𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟥/𝟢𝟪/𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾-𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍-𝟧-𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗈𝗇-𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗌.𝗁𝗍𝗆𝗅 𝟥. 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌://𝗐𝗐𝗐.𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈.𝖼𝗈𝗆/𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅-𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗒𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺/𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾-𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌-𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗌-𝟥𝟥𝟢𝟩𝟫.𝗁𝗍𝗆𝗅 [𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉 -> 𝗁𝗍𝗍𝗉𝗌]