Address rampant anorectal violence & misinformation! NOW!

Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. Hence, when more than one person is involved such violence should constitute a severe crime for any penetrative person. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. This is happening because the vast majority of humanity likely never will place a high value upon the good health of at least someone else's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters even though the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of anorectal violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Criminal justice has not been served in far too many cases, and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. People worldwide who are or were in a government position with jurisdiction to uphold that justice yet failed must be held accountable as well.

Fair warning: Assuming that this thread will be censored as several previous ones were, posting a hit list is planned for the next thread.

>>47410 >posting a hit list is planned for the next thread What do you mean? Why are you so mad? Are you incontinent now because of anal? Are you going to post appleman's address?

>I can't believe they would delete my spam!

https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm38270468

>>47409 > People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. Work-in-progress "decadence" paste: Rampant anorectal violence is a major problem. It is perhaps one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today. Rationale: • Several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and sometimes even emulating violent behavior that should easily be considered severely criminal. Perpetrators of anorectal violence against one or more others, most especially the serial offenders inspiring countless viewers, going unpunished for their violent crimes is a serious problem. Those violent criminals need to be punished severely and shown to be — by ANY means necessary. • Widespread ignorance—and most especially _willful_ ignorance—and apathy about the anus along with anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies both to have a field day with such violence and spread disinformation. Again, that unrestrained hedonism is contributing to societal decay, probably very significantly. Because so many people just don't wish to think about, much less seriously discuss anorectal matters, rampant anorectal violence "flies under the radar;" people would rather focus on some other kind of erotic abuse (which may not even be anywhere near as dangerous). • Given the widespread ignorance about what an anus is even supposed to look like, it's often the preferred target of people who like to disfigure body parts. It doesn't help that, despite it being one of our most important body parts, the anus is commonly denigrated and abused (intentionally treated in a harmful/injurious manner). That abuse is tolerated (or at least ignored) by far too many people. The vast majority of humanity may never care much at least about another person's anus, meaning that discouraging erotic anoreceptive activities entirely probably is the only effective solution.

>>47414 One thing I would say is that anal sex isn't even hot in it of itself. There's no erogenous zone in the anus; one could say that it is the prostate, but even then it doesn't feel anywhere as nice as stroking the cock -- where all of the nerves are. What makes anal sex hot is the psychological reality of being penetrated by a man, it's not the nerves contained within. Since it is not genital sex, it is probably maladaptive, and is a sign of some kind of psychosocial/psychosexual dysfunction. If you are a gay male it is better to do hand jobs or frotting if you would like to simulate the dominance/submissive aspect of sex.

>>47415 >What makes anal sex hot is the psychological reality of being penetrated by a man Or a woman with a strap-on. Pegging is a real (and very fun!) thing.

Hmm. I recently dropped a paste that states the following. Perhaps I should integrate what I wrote below, or something similar, into one of the other pastes I'm still using: The human anorectum is very unsuited for many all-too-common receptive activities due to the region's anatomy and physiology. The single short-term benefit, _potential_ pleasure, is greatly outweighed by the many short- and long-term health risks to a receptive person. [Rationale: Anorectal Risks 1-3] On the other hand it could be argued that pleasure, potential or actual, is a red herring especially in the context of anorectal violence. Whether an injurious/violent activity feels good for one or more participants involved is immaterial when that activity shouldn't be done in the first place.

Everyone laughs, but I'm on your side, anti-sodomy Lain. There are reasons why sodomy used to be illegal; 'because god said so' is just the reason we gave normals that's simple enough for them to understand. Norms finally figured out god doesn't talk to us, and now they're running around sodomizing each other. Normals really are incapable of basic logic. It's disgusting and disgraceful that any of this even needs to be said, but that's the current state of affairs. Don't you have a few more png's? Would you mind posting them? You should make a pastebin. Can I have your permission to spam your work on 4chins and plebbit?

>>47593 > sodomy 1. "Sodomy" has religious connotations and can be ambiguous (it can also include oral erotic activities and even bestiality), so I try to refrain from using the term myself. 2. Since it encompasses more than anoreceptive activities alone, sodomy is a red herring. > There are reasons why sodomy used to be illegal Chiefly religious ones, yes, I know. I wrote specifically about erotic anorectal violence in the OP. Like other kinds of violence, there are or should be criminal implications when more than one person is involved. The "criminal justice" image is related. Such legal concepts may not apply everywhere, which is why I wrote that "when more than one person is involved such violence should constitute a severe crime for any penetrative person." ("Should" is indicative of opinion.) > Don't you have a few more png's? Yes. Two are included with this post. I'll post the remaining ones that make up the referenced compilation next. > You should make a pastebin. The OP image references an archived URL containing the text of the quote collections I call Trends & Associations, Anatomy & Trauma, Anorectal Risks 1-3, and Prolapse & Incontinence. > Can I have your permission to spam your work on 4chins and plebbit? You don't need my permission to do anything. That said, expect to be derezzed repeatedly at least on 4chan if you post the material from my compilation on some boards. I used to post such material on /s/, /hc/, and /gif/, where it most certainly was not welcome. /r9k/ was (usually) more accommodating.

>>47607 > I'll post the remaining ones that make up the referenced compilation next.