Address rampant anorectal violence & misinformation!

Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—involving a combination of rapid thrusting, a girthy penis/object, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anal and rectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. When more than one person is involved such abuse should therefore constitute severely criminal behavior for any penetrative person—especially if significant mental pathology, a strong judgment-impairing drug, etc. are involved. Pornography featuring anorectal violence can have numerous effects on some viewers. It may serve as inspiration for their own activities, condition them to be aroused by suffering, and contribute to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with such inclinations, some affiliated with pornography companies, are having a field day with anorectal violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. Governments worldwide have not addressed those matters effectively, and many people are suffering as a result. First and foremost, educational systems under their purview are failing to adequately and accurately educate people about anorectal anatomy, physiology, health, and especially the traumatic risks of anoreceptive activities. Secondly, governments are failing to rein in out-of-control pornography industries over which they have jurisdiction. Lastly, for people who both 1) harm others for profit and 2) inspire countless viewers, governments are failing to ensure that they face severe criminal consequences: Some of those viewers are inspired to the point of emulation, even using coercion.

Why were my previous two threads on /hum/ deleted? So far as I can tell they broke no posted rule. What I am posting most certainly does pertain to the human condition and human affairs. I have been lurking here for years, and I have posted about other topics numerous times. Lainchan currently is bookmarked as one of my favorite chans. I hope that I will not soon be adding this place to my list of awful chans due to censorship. Back on topic: >Reddit /r/painal Other subreddits which obviously violate Reddit's policy* regarding violent content yet strangely still persist despite that: /r/Pain /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles (There probably are more as well.) * "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people" https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151

>>43628 > for people who both 1) harm others for profit and 2) inspire countless viewers, governments are failing to ensure that they face severe criminal consequences The image is related. Of course, as I have noted before elsewhere: Erotic anorectal violence is rampant, has been for far too many years, and likely will continue to be for years into the future (partly because many people really don't want to think seriously about anorectal matters, but eventually they may be required to do so). Due to various factors including the passage of time (decades in some cases), relocation, and no applicable laws, many of those—past, present, and future—who perpetrate anorectal violence against one or more other people and/or profit from such behavior will never be criminally prosecuted severely and justly by any government short of imposition of appropriate criminal laws worldwide applying retroactively (it's pretty much guaranteed that will never happen). Therefore violent criminals who in many cases inspire countless others, along with accessories to their crimes—up to and including corporate executives—will have to be punished by some other means. At some point many people will have to acknowledge that significantly girthy and vigorous anoreceptive activities are objectively foolish for health reasons. I expect there will be mass bloodshed before that happens; the rampant and continued perpetration of anorectal violence against one or more others (not to mention the spreading of disinformation) at least by people who are satisfying destructive inclinations* and/or profiting monetarily is highly unlikely to stop without external forces intervening. I very strongly doubt that governments and their agents acting officially will be the forces doing so at first. * Particularly sexual sadism disorder and antisocial personality disorder (also known as psychopathy or sociopathy) — potentially combined in one person. Antisocial means "against society;" it is sometimes confused with asocial, or avoidant of / not taking part in society. Psychopaths allowed to run rampant promote societal disorder and decay: that is, decadence. (So too do people with other [self-]destructive inclinations such as sexual sadism disorder and sexual masochism disorder at least when their pathologically destructive behaviors inspire others, although without psychopathy they may feel remorse about their actions later on.)

>>43628 Why do you soykaff up every board known to man? Do you have a job? Do you have hobbies? Is this some sort of autistic fixation? Have a (you).

Did I include the text covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics in that variant of TAKE ACTION? Yes, yes I did.

>>43632 bullshit too overwhelming to argue is still bullshit

You crawl out sounding so provoked so shortly after a thread about the danger of sexual nationalism, now spewing pseudo-scientific precursors to sexist conclusions, literally the same tactic as a NAZI. Why not write an essay about testicular trauma or penal fractures? Both occur more often, without: shelters, specialized clinics, or public sympathy. gtfo

Im gonna keep rapidly shoving objects in and out of my ass while laughing and live till 90, encouraging everyone to do the same in my lifetime, and youl never stop me. Get owned.

>>43628 You make me want to die.

>>43636 >tranny desperate to defend their deviant sexual fetishes poopdick

>my thread is sagebombed with nastiness Is that why my previous threads were deleted? I was hoping people could remain civil and rational, but perhaps that is too much to expect in this day and age, most especially concerning these matters... (And yes, I myself have been known to abandon civility sometimes out of frustration. Humanity is woefully imperfect, and sadly I am all too human myself.) Anyway... For emphasis: >>43628 > Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: > • A red herring logical fallacy is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. One _very_ common example is trying to create an irrelevant discussion about a messenger/claimant (often by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions). > • An ad hominem logical fallacy is an argument or implication that at least one supposed characteristic about a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics potentially _can be_ relevant: for example, it may be appropriate to question a person's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy may apply in that situation.) > • Misrepresentation, or introducing a distorted version of something that is presented, is another form of red herring. Attacking such a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation with one or more vague, sweeping claims for which no proof is provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea: clear and specific, with citations if applicable.) > Purposely and repeatedly trying to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal abuse, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy.

>>43632 >AdultDVDTalk's Porn Pool That place has looked much the same for over ten years, with threads devoted to anorectal insanity (by every definition of the word) typically—perhaps even always, but that's a tall order to prove—being bumped daily at the least. There are plenty of other places which could be pointed out as well, e.g. pornography tube sites where anorectal violence is the norm for anal intercourse. Then there are other insane anorectal activities that also are much too common and popular. Furthermore, I haven't even touched on places where rampant misinformation/disinformation can be found. There is at least one popular subreddit which has enshrined the "sex-positive" bias into its rules; plenty of false information posted by users can be seen there being upvoted and typically going unchallenged. Perhaps that is because someone saying something like "doing that is a bad idea [for one or more reasons]" would be considered negative rather than factual (even when it is in fact true). Truth does not necessarily align with what people wish to hear nor with what operators of a filter bubble desire to exclude. (And yes, I am cognizant of the burden of proof, having written about it: I will be expected to furnish evidence if someone asks for it. That will not present a problem—I have been lurking on the subreddit mentioned previously for some time now, noting and archiving threads—although I am trying to draw people's attention more to facts than fiction.)

>>43645 I find it obnoxious that my post from the prior thread was deleted. It was fairly minimal, but nonetheless, it is gone now, and I do not feel like regenerating it.

This threat is a copypasta troll. https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=Blatantly%20injurious%20erotic%20anorectal%20violence

>>43628 Why not write an essay about testicular trauma or penal fractures? save the penis or gtfo

>>43650 Thanks lainon, that explains the weirdness.

>>43646 > There is at least one popular subreddit which has enshrined the "sex-positive" bias into its rules; plenty of false information posted by users can be seen there being upvoted and typically going unchallenged. The PDF is related: it is a collection of URLs mostly from Reddit's /r/sex with examples of what I wrote about plus examples of omission (e.g. no one mentioning the possibility of a preexisting condition). I tried to archive all of them on archive.is and archive.org; for threads that remain on Reddit, some relevant posts present on one or both archive sites may no longer be extant on Reddit due to user self-deletion or moderator interference. >>43631 > Why do you soykaff up every board known to man? As I have pointed out countless times before, ultimately this is not about me. That said, and for the record, I've posted on relatively few places actually. Moreover, I tend to focus on one or two at a time. Perhaps that is because I don't want what I post to be seen as "spam," although I stand to gain nothing from this effort monetarily in any case. Maybe I _should_ try to "post and run" on many sites without regard for the perceptions of others. Perhaps more (or rather, ANYTHING AT ALL) would be accomplished that way. Looking at Patch and similar people, doing so seems to be a successful tactic: they manage to attract posters to the chan-of-the-moment being advertised.

They also clamp our cords.

>Maybe I _should_ try to "post and run" on many sites without regard for the perceptions of others. Perhaps more (or rather, ANYTHING AT ALL) Spamming these posts to people who dont want spam accomplishes NEGATIVE, not nothing. It makes us immediately dismiss anorectal violence concerns because you have no respect for our community.

>>43673 >I don't want what I post to be seen as "spam," I've seen you repost this thread after deletion no less than three times this week. It is, by definition, spam. No-one here on lainchan will discuss anorectal politics seriously. Screencap this. If you want to find groups who take these topics seriously, maybe consider 16chan.xyz.

>>43673 These matters (the image is, of course, related) need to be addressed with serious and effective action. They needed to be addressed in that manner many years ago. Now, thanks to people's inaction, it's too late for some serially violent criminals who inspire countless viewers to be punished by any government for their crimes (barring highly improbable institution of worldwide retroactive laws, as I suggested previously in a post I made elsewhere and also pasted here). >>43674 I reposted due to unexplained censorship. As I pointed out about my previous two threads: So far as I can tell they broke no posted rule. Censorship makes me try harder in some cases. I also may escalate. > 16chan.xyz Speaking of censorship... Been there, done that.

>>43682 >So far as I can tell they broke no posted rule. 7 and then 1 But more importantly, you clearly don't care about our website and our culture and yet expect to be listened to. You copy-paste the same rant everywhere. Doing it again won't make us care. You're treating us without respect, so why should we respect you? Proprietary software and corporate surveillance, e-waste and professional cybercrime hurts far more people than sexual violence. Get some perspective.

>>43683 >Proprietary software and corporate surveillance, e-waste and professional cybercrime hurts far more people than sexual violence. I think that's probably not actually true. More people get abused than you might think. But people getting anal polyps because they don't know how to sex is definitely not high on the list.

>>43684 yes I exaggerated, but in this context of anorectal abuse I thought it was fine

>>43683 Breaking rule 7: It is not spam (regardless of people's perceptions). Again, I stand to gain nothing from this effort monetarily. > you [...] You [...] You're [...] you? Again: Ultimately this is not about me. > treating us without respect Respect is earned. Many people don't seem to be respecting the significance/importance of the matters about which I have been posting. > Proprietary software and corporate surveillance, e-waste and professional cybercrime hurts far more people than sexual violence. Even more red herrings: Again, see also what I wrote about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics. >>43684 > I think that's probably not actually true. More people get abused than you might think. As pointed out in the very first post, anorectal violence at least is rampant. > But people getting anal polyps because they don't know how to sex is definitely not high on the list. There are many more concerns than merely "anal polyps." See the traumatic risks summary in the TAKE ACTION image. I suspect that I will end up posting that summary as text here.

>>43686 >Again, I stand to gain nothing from this effort monetarily. Irrelevant. It's still spam. It's unsolicited generic copypasta irrelevant to this site and its interests (regardless of your perceptions). >Ultimately this is not about me. Then go talk to the people it is about. They'll be willing to garner support and take action, not us. >Respect is earned. Well you're not earning our respect so I don't give a soykaf about what you think are important issues. You must have noticed this pattern wherever you go, right?

>>43687 > It's still spam. I already pointed out that it is not. Why do some people like to waste my time so? A nefarious agenda could be one explanation. > It's unsolicited generic copypasta irrelevant to this site and its interests Again: What I am posting most certainly does pertain to the human condition and human affairs. > what you think are important issues 1. Yet again: Ultimately this is not about me. 2. They are important issues. One day many people will realize that to their deep regret. As I pointed out elsewhere years ago: There are many traumatic consequences of such activities, variously serious, chronic, and permanent. > You must have noticed this pattern wherever you go, right? I noticed that there are numerous people out there who clearly have a nefarious agenda and keep on using tactics about which I keep on posting, yes. As I pointed out elsewhere: Certainly pornography companies would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful "psyop" [operatives, replacing lainchain-verboten word] since some of them already take advantage of them for criminal abuse.

>>43686 > the traumatic risks summary Traumatic risks of human anoreceptive activities include inflammation, abrasion and tearing, muscle and connective tissue damage, and colorectal perforation. Sequelae may arise, such as hemorrhage/hematoma, hemorrhoidal disease, ulceration, bacterial infection followed by abscess / fistula / life-threatening systemic sepsis, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence, anal skin tag (remnant of external hemorrhoidal thrombosis, scar tissue from a healed tear, or a sentinel tag for a chronic anal fissure), and anatomic stenosis (narrowing due to constricting scar tissue). One instance of trauma can lead to multiple complications. Cumulative damage and preexisting conditions are concerns as well. ~2cm beyond the anal opening at the pectinate/dentate line, the epithelium transitions from stratified squamous (anoderm) to a simple columnar mucosal lining in part of the narrow surgical anal canal, continuing along the rectum. That lining is very fragile and easily damaged especially if its mucus barrier is removed by an enema or otherwise impaired. Furthermore, some enemas and lubricants can inflame the lining and even cause it to slough off entirely. Injury to that lining alone elicits no pain sensations due to a lack of somatic innervation, so resultant problems may remain undetected absent one or more obvious symptoms. Neuromuscular physiology also contributes to anorectal fragility particularly for girthy and vigorous insertions, which are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious. The involuntary internal anal sphincter relaxes with rectal distension. The puborectalis and external sphincter completely relax when a person bears down, causing hemorrhoidal cushions to engorge and become more susceptible to injury by shear (frictional sliding) force.

>>43628 >no glossary Wikipedia-style biased collection of citations is still a biased statement >wikipedia major & inexcusable flaws Like the rest of wikipedia? just the accumulation of citations from authoritative sources already made wikipedia entirely flawed and not just limited to your pro 4nus articles. 0/10 Might as well use public journals for citations featuring results from real people or laboratory rats not and some suspicious ip-logger style paste website. >using archive.is ever >archiving pastes lmao >quoting reddit Hopefully not your bastion right? Also anorectal violence or whatever may be caused by none other than violent men you know "being violent" during sexual intercourse. It's not about the 'platform' that preach of it or how the internet became host of such thing like all things in the form of information can be posted in the internet WOW that was possible???but the people who operate. That's like saying we should delete all imageboards or just delete internet because of violent shooters and concluding that it would prevent further violence or prevent all kinds of violence posted in the internet??? WOW. Might as well just start a journey about ending violence in general of if you can't then maybe health advocacy - in fact they might welcome that. More tax, more medication, more for them, less for you.

>>43692 > biased 1. The burden of proof is on the claimant. 2. Whether a source is biased is a distraction from whether what is being claimed is true or not. Biased sources can make true claims; bringing up bias to suggest that something factual is untrue is called an ad hominem logical fallacy (attacking the source(s) rather than addressing the claim(s) being made). > just the accumulation of citations from authoritative sources already made wikipedia entirely flawed Uh, yeah, you're welcome to your opinion. >archiving pastes I referenced my Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation 20210101 in the OP image. It is a collection of quotes from numerous sources including but not limited to peer-reviewed journals, medical web sites, medical books, and news sites in the case of Trends & Associations. Three of the images posted in this thread comprise half of that compilation; the other half is made up of Anatomy & Trauma, Anorectal Risks 3, and Prolapse & Incontinence. Those are names I have given to separate and distinct collections of quotes from many others. >quoting reddit 1. I posted an image of the /r/painal subreddit along with Reddit's policy on violent content. 2. I mentioned various subreddits similar to /r/painal. 3. I posted a PDF containing a collection of URLs mostly from Reddit's /r/sex with examples of what I wrote about in >>43646 plus examples of omission (e.g. no one mentioning the possibility of a preexisting condition). The rest of your post seems to wander off in various directions, and frankly doesn't make much sense.

Based. OP, your works are aligned with the will of the MONAD.

>>43695 You still have not written your research assignment on testicular trauma or penal fractures. I will read nothing about anuses or vaginas until I have penises to compare!

Wait so when I first read this I was thinking, not this sort of soykaf again, but now i'm pretty baffled and entertained. I'm pretty sure I disagree with you as quite the anorectal enthusiast myself but in practice not research, however actually I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've actually said just in your main points in some ways. I just get a feeling you are broadening the definitions of some terms without telling us. But what actually is it you are arguing, i'm not even going to argue with you except on a two things, or rather make two "points". >some "arguments" not related to your actual post but your posting that i'm not expecting you to address if you don't want to. One im gonna say you labcoat types have a tendency to get tunnelvision and obsess over a body of studies to the point where it's all you know and you don't even consider looking for studies saying the opposite yourself like a normal scientist. Two consider how many of us actually have studies on hand about anorectal violence, or that really want to go look it up. You have a weird tone and self importance to your words as if you believe this to be a legitimate scientific discussion, which i'm not gonna say is unwarranted. I don't know you. I am just gonna say considering the first thing I said in this paragraph, this hardly seems like the right place. Not as in we can't talk about this, and i'm not sure why the mods deleted your posts especially if they were written like this, i'm just not sure why you think this article spam is the way. It could just be me but I tend to avoid threads like these because it ends up me vs endless spam of articles with specific vocabulary i'm forced to learn, by various authors with sometimes contradictory points but that aren't the labcoat posters point, and with varying degrees of professionality and experience I naturally would not have in whatever topic im idly discussing today. While I could do the same in return, I don't have the articles on deck because I didn't care about whatever topic is being presented until the discussion, and I also wouldn't it's pretty boring to me as I can make articles debate eachother on my own. Which actually meads me to my >actual real questions now If I asked you to find the article(s) you best think counter(s) your point and post it/them here would you? You say the burden of proof is on us to that other poster, and that may be reasonable for them, but I'm not truly trying to have a debate here or win anything. What truly is your argument. I can't tell if you are saying one or multiple of these things 1. forced anal sex is criminal and violent and leads to psychological damage, which i'd objectively agree with. I only might but probably wouldn't agree more than vaginal, and I would agree it does more than any sort of non penetrative sexual violence. 2. Forced anal sex is rampant + the above, i'm uh not inclined to agree it is more than regular sexual violence but I wouldn't really feel any type of way about this. 3. Most anal sex is unconsensual because people aren't aware of what they are consenting to the first time. I think this is possible and a pretty good point, I couldn't say most but i'd consider it. 4. All anal sex isn't good, but i'm only arguing about one or multiple of the above in terms of criminality. I'd disagree but I respect it. now for the ones I first thought your argument was and it may be. 5. All anal sex is criminal and violent, those consenting either fall under 3. or have already been through 3. and so are psychologically scarred and only consent because of unhealthy views of sex inflicted on them through trauma. 6. Not all anal sex is criminal but it is all violent, and only pleasurable as the people are sadists or masochists getting off on pain or others pain. And that often it is criminal. >end of questions for now I must say the more I read your first post i'm getting the impression maybe you are being misunderstood, like you say "blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence" as if to distinguish it from more casual anal sex. but i'm unsure because it seems odd that you'd just be trying to convince us that anal sex can be violent, it certainly can without a doubt i'd have even more questions for someone disagreeing with that.

>>43702 *leads also naturally if none of those are your points that's fine and I just want to know your view of anal sex, anorectal violence, and if you see them as one in the same. I also kinda shoulda put the questions first to be honest because some of them if you answered a certain way might negate my hangups about your posts themselves.

Rampant Anorectal Violence is my favorite metal band

>>43731 It really does sound like a stereotypical goregrind name.

>>43702 Dear OP, why do you keep ignoring my very serious query about testicular trauma ? >>43700

>>43702 > What truly is your argument. I can't tell if you are saying one or multiple of these things From the original post: Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—involving a combination of rapid thrusting, a girthy penis/object, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. That should be clear enough if you look up dictionary definitions of violence. These at least apply (from dictionary.com): swift and intense force; rough or injurious physical force, action, or treatment. Anorectal health problems resulting from erotic anorectal activities are becoming more common (see Trends & Associations). That parallels trends including 1) more people getting ideas from pornography and 2) more receptive people engaging in violent anoreceptive activities, including violent anal intercourse, due to various negative factors being involved (e.g. coercion, ignorance, a [self-]destructive mental disorder on the part of one or more people involved, etc.), and a plethora of misinformation and bad advice online (such as advice to "go slow *AT FIRST*," "gradually stretch the anus with increasingly larger objects," etc). > I must say the more I read your first post i'm getting the impression maybe you are being misunderstood, like you say "blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence" as if to distinguish it from more casual anal sex. I wrote specifically about a combination of rapid thrusting, a girthy penis/object, and a prolonged duration. I followed that up by stating that it is impossible for resultant anal and rectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology. That combination of attributes will not always apply to every instance of anorectal eroticism. Penis girth varies for example. There also are numerous kinds of such eroticism; anilingus for example is unlikely to result in traumatic damage anywhere near the level of anorectal violence as I defined it. >>43752 From the OP image: • A red herring logical fallacy is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction.

>>43628 > As of 2021/04/04 and for far too many years prior, several English-language Wikipedia articles have had major & inexcusable flaws, including: > • The article about the human anus has an image of a human female's anus and perineum that probably were damaged by some kind of major trauma. Human females beyond developmental stages in the womb should lack an externally-visible perineal raphe, or seamlike union/ridge, in the anogenital region between the anus and the vagina; the bulbospongiosus muscle is separated in them and does not form a persistent, visible midline raphe as it may in males [References: Anatomy & Trauma]. > • The article about simple columnar epithelium explains nothing about its fragility nor lack of somatic innervation (for pain sensitivity). > The article about anal sex ... > • lacks a neutral point of view — a required element of Wikipedia's philosophy. It fails to present even one _scientific_ opposing perspective, giving readers without exposure to balanced sources the impression that opposition is limited to irrational religious positions. One such scientific perspective: The human anorectum is very unsuited for many all-too-common receptive activities due to the region's anatomy and physiology. The single short-term benefit, _potential_ pleasure, is greatly outweighed by the many short- and long-term health risks to a receptive person. [Rationale: Anorectal Risks 1-3] > • fails to mention the normalization of injurious anoreceptive violence in pornography featuring real people. > • does not point out that "hemorrhoid" is an ambiguous term, sometimes referring to pathology and other times to normal anatomy. > • contains a logically-fallacious appeal to nature: "natural" is not necessarily good or desirable, nor is "unnatural" necessarily the inverse. > Those flaws contribute to rampant anorectal violence and misinformation facilitating it. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Simple_columnar_epithelium&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_anus&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anal_sex&action=history I've been checking those for relevant changes quite frequently for far too many years as well.

>>43820 Anoreceptive activities most certainly can be significantly damaging in the absence of a combination of those three factors I mentioned: both rapid thrusting and a girthy penis/object can cause significant damage on their own. The point of what I wrote is to focus on all-too-common behavior that undeniably constitutes significantly injurious violence and consequently _should_ have severely criminal implications for any penetrative person when more than one person is involved. Below are moderately revised versions of old posts of mine elsewhere that are very relevant. The originals can be found on sites archiving 4chan /gif/ thread 9488931 from October 2016 and 4chan /r9k/ thread 19081560 from May 2015. (Quoting myself) > At best, anal intercourse and significant anoreceptive activities accelerate or guarantee the development of anorectal health problems. That could in theory be untrue if such activities are done with ridiculously excessive care* all the time, every time. * That includes, but is not limited to: ruling out preexisting anorectal conditions (possibly caused by prior erotic trauma), always using lubricant, avoiding lubricants that irritate/damage the rectal lining, avoiding enemas (all enemas, hyperosmolar or otherwise, probably remove the rectum's protective mucus barrier), always using a condom (particularly in the absence of an enema), never thrusting too rapidly ("too rapid" could vary for different people, at least for the anal tissues), never inserting anything too girthy ("too girthy" also could vary), never using numbing agents (pain indicates that something is wrong — anally, but not rectally), etc. In practice using ridiculously excessive care is unrealistic — it'd be more of a chore than a pleasure. Furthermore, both ignorance and misinformation are rampant, pornography sets a very bad example that some viewers get ideas from, and people with (self-)destructive tendencies are having a field day.

What about testicular trauma ?!? >>43629 is sexist.

Sexual violence has been so ingrained in my existence that it doesn't even shock me now. Maybe it was meant to happen, but I think porn played a big part in it. Calling sadism/masochism a disorder feels so alien man, there's no going back for me isnt'it ?

>>43895 > Sexual violence has been so ingrained in my existence that it doesn't even shock me now. Yes, erotic violence has become far too prevalent, to the point that is has been normalized. > Maybe it was meant to happen, but I think porn played a big part in it. There is some evidence linking exposure at least to violent pornography with becoming desensitized to erotic violence. > Calling sadism/masochism a disorder feels so alien man, there's no going back for me isnt'it ? What you described previously sounds more like apathy or _maybe_ antisocial personality disorder aka psychopathy (i.e., lacking empathy for others / remorse about harming others / a conscience). Sexual sadism disorder and sexual masochism disorder involve the derivation of pleasure from pain. Sexual sadism disorder combined with antisocial personality disorder in one person is considered particularly dangerous according to this Merck page: https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/sexuality,-gender-dysphoria,-and-paraphilias/sexual-sadism-disorder

>>43682 > Now, thanks to people's inaction, it's too late for some serially violent criminals who inspire countless viewers to be punished by any government for their crimes I wrote elsewhere about politicians in the U.S. (particularly in the state of California) who failed to rein in an out-of-control pornography industry over which they had jurisdiction. I tend to focus too much on the U.S. however. Can anyone name politicians elsewhere who also should be held accountable for the same failure?

For the exceedingly lazy and/or paranoid, here are the contents of several images posted in this thread in a text file: "TAKE ACTION v8" and "criminal justice."

>>44063 Here are the contents of the referenced "Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation 20210101" as a text file.

>>44063 thank you oh, biggy biggy biggy, can't you see, your post is to short to be posted by me

>>44064 OP I give zero fuarrrks about your crusade, unless and until you provide me with a girlfriend.

>>44068 I want to know when the crusade will include testicular trauma.

>>43842 > The article about the human anus has an image of a human female's anus and perineum that probably were damaged by some kind of major trauma. Human females beyond developmental stages in the womb should lack an externally-visible perineal raphe, or seamlike union/ridge, in the anogenital region between the anus and the vagina; the bulbospongiosus muscle is separated in them and does not form a persistent, visible midline raphe as it may in males [References: Anatomy & Trauma]. That article has seen quite a few edits by one user very recently. It appears to be mostly busy work, with the exception of a substantial addition of Freudian psychology that was reverted by another user. So far the major issue that I pointed out remains.

I feel like Cassandra of Troy. Ugh.

You and me both Lain. You are not alone. https://neko.bar/

>>44483 This is just so damn disheartening. >>44524 fuarrrk off, troll. >>43667 > Maybe I _should_ try to "post and run" on many sites without regard for the perceptions of others. Perhaps more (or rather, ANYTHING AT ALL) would be accomplished that way. I don't see that I have anything to lose by doing that. It seems to me that very few, if any, people are listening anyway. Perhaps by giving more credence to those who call this stuff "spam" (among other labels) I'll make the situation worsen even more quickly and/or further. Doing so could potentially hasten the arrival of a time when many people will be forced to think seriously about these matters (because, for example, too high a percentage of the populace develops anorectal issues resulting from erotic trauma, to the point that they become impossible for societies worldwide to ignore). I'll now head elsewhere. If no one else posts anything meriting a response then I'm done with this thread.