Moderation and Politics on /drug/

Hey lains, this might be a bit off topic when it comes to drugs but it is certainly relevant when it comes to this board. >So I recently gave a typical chan-type answer to a trans autistic guy on here >A day later I see my post missing >Guess the mods deleted it because it wasn't PC enough Well.. can anyone give me any insight on this? I always had the feeling that all of the chans catered towards free speech. Even if not everyone agrees or some people might get their feelings hurt. >If you disagree, either ignore or state your disagreement in a post of your own - not just delete/ban opinions that you disagree with as thoughtcrime.

Opinions are fine, but if you write very low-effort soykafpоsts like a tourist from you-know-where (or anywhere really), they get removed. You've posted this thread on the wrong board too, which means you clearly haven't read the rules, and it's gonna get locked. Lurk moar

Yes this place is a dictatorship without frozen fruit so you better leave for places with freedom and contribute your quality posts there.

>>5827 Been on this board for about 7-8 months now. Not an old user, I admit, but not a tourist either. I have read the rules on the sticky post of this board and there is no rule "dont talk about the state of this board". Also elaborate on which board this post should go instead, don't just say it belongs somewhere unnamed. And yeah, seems like you value feelings over freedom. That pretty much says enough about the type of character you have. I disagree with you, yet I don't want your disagreement deleted or derezzed.

>>5827 Alright I've read the rules you were so keen about. You clearly haven't read rule no. 6 given that you also broke it.

This forum is founded by a pseudo-intellectual underage weeb.

>>5829 >>5830 >6. Do not whine and cry about (...) mods, bans (...) outside of /q/. Same rule I was referring to. This thread should've been posted on /q/ so it's probably gonna get moved there anyway. From what I've seen, posts don't get removed unless they break rules 3 and 4. If you elaborate on your opinions and they're relevant, then there's quality discussion and everything's good. It's not out of a desire to censor. I personally really, really hate censorship and "typical" power-tripping forum moderation, but that's not the case here and it's really not hard to fit in.

Moved to >>>/q/7769.