(untitled)

What is currently the best way for an average person to get weed? What are your recommendations for someone in quarantine?

buy on thr deepweb, chrck out dark.fail for markets

and learn how to use pgp, do never send your address unencrypted

You can still cop from the street, as an alternative you can learn how to use dnm and get better quality product for better price.

Live in a state where it's legal and get it delivered to you.

I think DNMs are almost certainly surveiled, despite the assertions that TOR et. al. are truly anonymous. Assertions that have their roots in US and Israeli intelligence agencies, by the way. That's just a fact. Snowden was a psyop; a limited hangout. Was it really a revelation that the NSA is spying on people on the internet? Duh. And his prescription is to use a tool they developed in-house? Get real. There have been many highly suspicious busts where the feds knew stuff they really shouldn't have and wouldn't cough up the source of evidence in court. That said, they don't wanna nab everyone. They're probably collecting dirt mostly for political means, and not interested in petty crime and small-time 'heads. Go to a legal state or find somebody on the street I'd say. Although it takes a little practical experience buying on the street safely. A road trip would be a fun quar diversion and you can stock up and stash it somewhere in the car and bring it home.

Have friends IRL

>>5840 >I think DNMs are almost certainly surveiled They certainly are. This is not uncontroversial among vendors. >the assertions that TOR et. al. are truly anonymous. Assertions that have their roots in US and Israeli intelligence agencies, by the way. Assertions ain't soykaf. You can study how they work yourself, look at known attacks and published papers. It's not hard to understand. Nobody should assume that they're safe just because they use Tor. Nobody who stays active on the darknet for long does. >Was it really a revelation that the NSA is spying on people on the internet? for a lot of people, it really was. >And his prescription is to use a tool they developed in-house? Get real. The NSA did not develop Tor, it was originally developed by the Naval Research Lab. The more people use Tor, the more anonymity it can provide. If you want to actually discuss how Tor is vulnerable to attack instead of just throwing around accusations, make a thread in /tech/. For now you are going to have to use it if you want access to most darknet markets. >There have been many highly suspicious busts where the feds knew stuff they really shouldn't have and wouldn't cough up the source of evidence in court. like? >Go to a legal state or find somebody on the street I'd say. Although it takes a little practical experience buying on the street safely. A road trip would be a fun quar diversion and you can stock up and stash it somewhere in the car and bring it home. The reason so many drug dealers operate on the darknet is because it is empirically less risky than doing things in person. Not in terms of whether the NSA can see what you're doing; in terms of whether you are likely to actually get picked up by the cops.

>>5842 s/this is not uncontroversial/this is uncontroversial

>>5842 >>There have been many highly suspicious busts where the feds knew stuff they really shouldn't have and wouldn't cough up the source of evidence in court. >like? I'm not >>5840 but I think what he's referring to is parallel construction, where authorities produce evidence through illegal means (making it inadmissible in court) then produce another 'way' they obtained the evidence legally (making it admissible in court). There was a CP bust a while back by the FBI where the FBI wouldn't disclose the exact details of how it obtained evidence about the defendant, and as such the court threw out the case. This may be what >>5840 is referring to. I couldn't find an actual source so take this from a grain of salt as it is from my memory.

>>5840 You assume the markets are surveilled. That's why you connect with Tor and encrypt your messages with the Vendor's pgp key. Unless they get your vendor's private key they won't know your address.

>>5777 >get better quality product for better price. the quality point is legit but you wouldn't save a lot of money when ordering weed

>>6167 >Unless they get your vendor's private key they won't know your address. Its worth considering that the vendor may be a law enforcement sting op. They aren't going to blow their cover by going after randos buying a sheet of acid for personal use but if you're buying bulk to sell it is probably a good idea to take additional precautions, like shipping to a *good* dead drop (by which I mean not a random abandoned house, your postal carrier does the same route every day and they are trained to report things like this). The "it isn't illegal to receive illegal things in the mail if you claim you dont know what it is" adage probably has some validity but even if it holds up in court it'll put you on LE's radar and there's only so much you can do to hide from actual targeted meatspace surveillance.

>>6236 >They aren't going to blow their cover by going after randos buying a sheet of acid but they can't send you the Drugs, not even to hold up their cover to go after some bigger fish. and if they simply don't ship and only wait for big orders they wouldn't accomplish soykaf because no one would buy a huge amount of a new vendor without any reviews. I have heard that they have a bunch of Honeypots like that for Weapons though but i doubt that they will actually ship anything

>>6243 typically they try de-anonymizing vendors, wait for a critical mass of orders to accumulate, and then pick everyone up at once.

>>6244 but then they still don't have the PGP key. sure i can imagine that its more lucrative for vendors to just give it to them in most cases but that's still far from the Honeypot described in the post above (i assume not made by you) but yes, ordering drugs online isn't bulletproof

>>6246 You're also assuming that the vendors are practicing good opsec. Even if the vendor doesn't hand over the key theres the risk they have it stored somewhere that authorities can easily access.

>>6246 they would catch the vendor outside, charge them in a secret court, take a plea bargain, and the vendor would be doing all of it. Either that or they would just compel the vendor to give them the key. Nobody's going to jail for your ass. Vendors will be given the option to plea bargain when caught and usually they will take it.

>>6247 >>6248 i'm not assuming that vendors wouldn't hand out their pgp key wtf? i was just stating that Honeypots as described by >>6236 aren't a thing on drug markets because of pgp and the structure of completed orders/reviews etc.

>>5773 Ask the gas station/dollar store worker that looks like they do drugs if they know where you can get a connection.

>>6253 You'd be surprised at how many supposed "vendors" are just feds, because you have no idea about who is selling the stuff and if they're trustworthy or not, you run a high risk of getting busted. I have seen multiple people try it and it worked for them initially.... then they got caught and arrested.

>>6262 >gas station/dollar store worker that looks like they do drugs This. Basically weed is for niggers so if you want to find weed you need to ask a nigger or a wigger dropout where to find it. Assuming you aren't a retard I suggest just not doing drugs.

>>6266 >You'd be surprised at how many supposed "vendors" are just feds I like big dicks and putting things in my ass, so I can tell when you're pulling soykaf out of your ass. That's entrapment in the US. Besides, cops have to produce evidence you ordered it for charges to stick. >because you have no idea about who is selling the stuff and if they're trustworthy or not, you run a high risk of getting busted. Every single market has a web of trust system implemented. Ratings and escrow protect buyers from getting scammed. Opsec vendor side is an issue, yes. General consensus is that the longer the vendor has been active the more tight their opsec is. I've ordered from vendors that have been around since SR1, still alive and kicking. The vendors who have soykafty opsec make the news. >I have seen multiple people try it and it worked for them initially.... then they got caught and arrested. Been doing this since SR1. Not hard to do. Maintain proper and current opsec and you can do it too. Here's my bust story, since you seem to take anecdotal evidence as fact: Ordered drugs internationally to the US. I had police conduct a no-knock raid on my drop while I was sleeping. I was arrested, had all of my electronics seized, had everything imaged. Drop was clean, had nothing they could charge me with. If I had a bit of weed in my drop that would have been another story. Cops took me in, I plead fifth and refused questions. Lawyer shows up, talks to cops. They don't have any evidence I did soykaf. They release me, give me all my soykaf back (except the drugs lol). Drop burned, but I'm still free.

Find someone you know that travels to Colorado, or some other legalized state, frequently and ask them if they know any hookups

>>6293 Also like 70% of Jimmy Johns workers smoke in my experience, so you could just ask one of the night crew and they won't give a fuarrrk

>>5773 It may be hard for you OP. Getting weed in non-legal areas means you've got to socialize. Not a lot of folks want to do that right now. There may be ways on the darkweb, but I've not used them. Good luck