if u dont have a fent test whatre u even doin

a while i copped some molly off this dude in my area. i looked at it and it looked almost black. i asked the mf what the deal was, n he said "its more of a purple, but my link said the batch jus got a lil burnt" >yeasure.jpg i got home n tested the soykaf, it was indeed mdma. oh, and some fent. :) ive seen more molly in my life than 99% of ppl and ive always tested it, but fent coming up is a first. y they would put an opiod in an upper is a q for the maker, but it should serve as a reminder to always test ur soykaf.

>>10926 fent is now present in almost every other drug, doctors are even cautioned to screen all users because even some pot has fent in it

>>10927 There was a scare at some festival recently where doctors believed that some shrooms had been contaminated with fent. The doctors believed that because they had a few overdoses which responded to narcan. The people claimed they only took shrooms. They didn't do toxicology reports so it's unknown if the people actually had fent in their system. It's most likely that either people were having a panic attack and the act of having some medicine administered by doctors calmed them (the same way it does for cops who "overdose" on fent by just touching it, as those cops are also just having panic attacks) or they did some other drugs and were too ashamed to admit it. Nobody ever procured a sample of the shrooms so it's up in the air. >>10926 You may want to read https://dancesafe.org/urgent-most-recent-batch-of-fentanyl-test-strips-requires-more-dilution-when-testing-mdma-and-meth/ tldr some batches of fent tests require a different dilution to be accurate, and otherwise are likely to cause false positives when testing mdma. If your dilution is off in general, it can cause false positives. Purple coloring sometimes indicates they added some purple dye to it to trick tests with the Marquis reagent. If you just used Marquis to test it, you may wish to test it with some other reagents.

what's the advantage to putting fent in anyway?

>>10934 >"advantage" killing white people

those fent test strips are really inconsistent and give false positives all the time. How many did you try and how much did you dilute it? One strip showing positive doesn't really say much. unless you're buying another opioid substance it's unlikely someone intentionally cut it with fent but cross contamination is always possible. Dark net sellers are usually better with this since all it would take is one sample of their fent contaminated drugs being sent to drugsdata for their reputation to be done for

>>10934 drug users bad schemes

it's authorities scheming if cannabis is fent, then cannabis bad cannabis is fine, fent bad I say

can't you just do like, melting point tests and basic distillations

>>10940 This only works for some substances and 'basic' distillations still require a setup not everyone has or can afford especially if you want to minimize waste. >>10928 >Purple coloring sometimes indicates they added some purple dye to it to trick tests with the Marquis reagent. if they did it should be pretty easy to tell. a marquis reaction should turn dark purple or black instantly and it will fizzle quite a bit and even smoke, you can hear it if you are in a quiet room. I think bunk police have videos showing different reactions if you want something better than just a color chart.

>>10939 disingenuous dealers trying to offset poor quality drugs by lacing them with fent is the issue. >It will get you reaaaaal high

>>10943 okay... why would they not scheme as such though? they do unethical things just fine it seems

>>10946 Not sure I understand, the OP was warning people to check for fent, which is everywhere because norms wanting a fix get hooked on cheap fent because of whatever the fuarrrk else they are doing.

>>10943 I know for a fact, chemical weapons, mutilation of brain are used, and then cannabis related psychosis is claimed. I know for a fact police are a criminal organization. I know for a fact doctors criminally organize.

>>10985 Nothing has changed anon. These things are the same way they have always been. Why do you call it criminal?

>>10934 it's cheap, readily available, has an extremely low minimum effective dose, and highly addictive. should be obvious why people are cutting relatively less harmful substances with it

>>11644 That's the case for other opiods but it's extremely rare for mdma to be cut with fent. It's just not a synergistic combo, and dealers know if they cut molly with fent, they're just risking losing customers (due to lower roll quality and risk of OD) and getting more heat from law enforcement. Most mdma users are using 100-300mg per dose and don't have an opioid tolerance, so dealers would only be able to add at most a couple mg of fent to a point of molly, which is pointless as far as cutting goes. On the extremely rare instances that fent is found in mdma, it's much more likely to be a cross contamination issue where someone in the supply chain handled both fent (or drugs cut with fent) and mdma without keeping the prep sites separate.

so i sat down and roughly measured the amount of extraction buffer solution that comes in the package, and it was around 4ml. the test has a cut off of 200ng/ml, so the amount of fent in the sample per test was ~.8mcg. i did not weight the sample size, but it was far less than a point. i couldnt find anything on fent oral effective doses, but if the other methods of intake are anything to go by, ppl who took this molly were approaching the effective dose. anyone who took multiple doses probably had slight symptoms. the molly prolly disguised anything they felt tho lol >>10928 >some batches of fent tests require a different dilution to be accurate, and otherwise are likely to cause false positives when testing mdma. If your dilution is off in general, it can cause false positives. my tests are not any of the batches listed and ive tested a lot of mdma in this batch before and nvr gotten a positive. >Purple coloring sometimes indicates they added some purple dye to it to trick tests with the Marquis reagent. If you just used Marquis to test it, you may wish to test it with some other reagents. yezzir, i went ahead and used all the reagents i had bc of this reason. >>10937 >those fent test strips are really inconsistent and give false positives all the time the ones i used have a 96.8% accuracy rate on positives >How many did you try and how much did you dilute it? I tested three samples, each from different pieces of the mdma, w/ two strips from one package and one from another. I diluted it the normal amount, which is powder picked up on a cottonswab dissolved into ~4 ml of the extraction buffer solution >unless you're buying another opioid substance it's unlikely someone intentionally cut it with fent but cross contamination is always possible. ya u prolly right. either way, someone hella fuarrrked up to get so much fent in there.

How likely is it that coke will have fent in it? How could I make sure it's clean?

>>12417 >How likely is it that coke will have fent in it? not sure, possibly unlikely (pic related) https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/media-library/infographic-cocaine-samples-tested-drug-checking-services-between-january-and-june-2019_en have it checked anyway >what do get a fentanyl test strip. you may also be able to have it checked by a lab, this allows more comprehensive analysis and depending on your country it might be legal e.g. canada, nz, nl and other european countries https://www.cdc.gov/stopoverdose/fentanyl/fentanyl-test-strips.html https://dancesafe.org/drug-checking/

>>11662 96.8% accuracy means btwm 1 in 25 and 1 in 30 times will be inaccurate. So if you party ever weekend, twice a year.