Laser guns

I like laser guns. Do you like permablindness weapons?(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST, Rule 4 VIolation, Please elaborate on your subject material, your OP is terrible and the thread so far is also terrible, I don't want to have mop it up again.)

>>46675 As an expert in lasers, I am deeply concerned by this thread. Also why did you have to kill a thread for this lain :( plz If you think these are toys, you should probably not be anywhere around them, even more so if you want to use them to hurt or injure people. Treating lasers like toys is the same as people pointing loaded guns at each other for fun and saying "its harmless, my finger isn't on the trigger" Don't make me break out laser rekt photos

Also that snowy image... snow can reflect lasers and if you are in the ocular hazard distance you can still get the blind. If you put a magnified optic like the one picture, I assume the first blurry one is an eotech, but the other one looks magnified unless its just a soykafty ACOG or something, you run the risk of severe ocular damage like how you put a magnifying glass under the sun. to be honest I hate that I understand why the FDA made lasers difficult to obtain, and typing this I am filled with rage about normeees who ruined my hobby.

>>46684 I'm absolutely certain laser anon has some solid laser goggles >>46683 break em out

>>46683 >Don't make me break out laser rekt photos >>46687 >break em out Yes, please

sorry about the anchor on left, it was a cool thread

>>46698 No I understand, literally everywhere I go people recieve orders to anchor/ban me.

>>46675 Nah I prefer tracer ammunitions.

>>46683 Also; They are not toys, they are not hobbies, they are weapons. Cheap easy diy build for people who are lazy

>>46731 I prefer different ammo for different guns, but currently I've been digging these 115 grain Xtreme defenders out of my carbine. >Puts both visible and invisible lasers on my guns

>>46729 Part of it is the way the OP is phrased, lasers are really cool but it seems too forward with "use these lasers to permanently injure feds" that are reminiscent of incitement or glorifying violence, rather than a less aggressive discussion: "are lasers useful in protests? I think they are underutilized, we usually only ever seen handheld ones that distract riot police and pilots, like in the recent Bolivia protests".

There was a thread here a while ago about those police robots that resemble large dogs, can their optical censors be protected against lasers?

>>46744 There's been some relatively recent success in anti-drone usage of lasers.

>>46745 Electro-Optical coatings make laser defense super easy. They are also the reason militarized optics cost a gorrilion dollars instead of the cheap off the shelf cost (like your go-pro 4k camera). Many coatings are trade secret though, especially doped optics. I don't know about the specific optic in question, but Laser defense has been a concern since IIRC as early as the 80s, if not earlier. IIRC there was also a phase where many modern armies tried using directed energy weapons as the wave of the future, but findings were that power generation, cooling, and atmospheric effects (rain/fog/dust) all reduce the effectiveness in combat, and the problem with reflection remains a hazard to unprotected troops. >private snuffy takes off his laser goggles because they fogged up, and takes a reflected beam straight to the eye In the examples of >>46744 who discusses the use in protests, One of the problems is blinding protesters, and causing irreversible damage. The secondary effect is people might stop going to protests if they expected to go blind. Distributing laser eye protection also becomes a costly matter, and sunglasses do not provide protection. I used to provide safety demonstrations to people using lasers, and people would ask why they can't just wear sunglasses to protect from lasers and I would set up a laser and show how it just goes right through. >>46746 Those are very expensive lasers. The difficulty becomes output vs. mobility, and if you are hand carrying or using electronic tracking and engagement. The first pic is a military laser weapon, the second is one of my favorite demonstration pictures of potential damage, IIRC it was a rabbit eye hit with an IR laser (I can't find the written explanation of it right now). Note that the Glare LA-9/P has a secondary safety attachment that detects safe firing range and will disable if the target gets close enough to cause damage (within the NOHD). >>46732 >They are not toys, they are not hobbies, they are weapons fuarrrk you, they are also industrial and scientific instruments and are also extremely practical in detecting IED tripwires. Misusing lasers as a weapon is also treated as deadly force in many cases, and in some states lasing someone will also land you in jail the same as if you were to shoot them or stab them, and in some cases people are justified in shooting you if you lase them. wearing tin foil shiny side out might make useful mirrored laser armor, laserlain should test this Present Day, Present Time! AHAHAHAHAHA!

>>46750 Your just upset that you can buy laser guns no permit.

>>46753 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ub35XuqYyfc https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3LbH7U6o9s8 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ePHK9JC3Ac Blinding = god tier

Intentionally pointing a laser at someone without some kind of defensible reason should be an automatic death penalty.

>>46756 Hahahaha until it is I will continue to have fun with my visible and invisible lasers

>>46753 Ngl if someone lases me, I will shoot them, in court I would have a valid defense case >The laser was attached to a gun and he was aiming at me to shoot me >He was trying to cause irreversible harm by blinding me, this constitutes "serious bodily harm"

>>46758 Except you know that you can't see near ir and I doubt you can stop a drone before it uses it's onboard facial recognition to blind you

>>46753 There are already laws because of people like you. Its illegal to buy class 4 laser pointers because people thought it was funny to permanently blind people who pissed them off. It's like going around stabbing peoples eyes out because they called you a glitterboy and thinking that is acceptable. Instead of making it permit based, you just CAN'T buy high powered handheld lasers. Sites will still sell them, but customs often seizes them and writes you a letter about how you fuarrrked up. A few laser sites that I am not even going to mention got wrapped up in a whole legal battle and stopped selling any laser over class 3.

>>46760 Didn't stop me at all 100% of my lasers even my kilowatt and Megawatt pulse lasers came in just fine. >Dabs on your eyeprotection with a Megawatt laser

A reminder that this is actually what happens if you use them. They end up extremely effective even vs trained enemy.

>>46762 >>46759 What the actual fuarrrk Lains! I come here to soykafpost, not to start investigations on you fuarrrks. Please don't make my job easier. I already had to sit through 6 hours of meetings on memes from a certain chan board this last week.

>>46757 And I will kill you for it. >>46762 The only reason it works there is because the police is too beta to respond with deadly force. What they should do in those cases is immediately open fire on the location of the laser. You'd be dead if you tried this against people who aren't pussies.

>>46763 According to the fbi I'm already a domestic terrorist. I'm not afraid of you. >>46764 Not if I shoot them at the same time.

>>46765 >Inb4 airsoft You fbi users Haven't done anything about my posting in over a year, I dare you to TRY to do something about it now.

>>46765 Yeah I'm sure you're going to win a shootout against the police when you're penned in by a panicking crowd and there's a fuarrrking bright laser showing everyone exactly where you are.

>>46767 Again: lasers can be invisible Lasers can be used from great range Lasers can be remote operated or very small Anything over 50 watts will blind you for life if you even see the spot

>>46768 >>46767 If I even fire this, anyone near it who isn't wearing eyeprotection goes blind. You will go blind if the spot lands near you.

>>46769 After a certain point the output simply makes looking anywhere near the user an extreme risk hazard.

>>46768 We are specifically talking about you standing in the middle of a crowd and shining a visible laser at the police. In that situation the only thing that can protect you is the police being too pussy to do their jobs. But yeah I'm sure you'd prefer to be far away and with an invisible laser, like the fuarrrking pussy glitterboy tranny subhuman you are.

>>46771 Naw i prefer scatters. This one combines near ir, red and blue/purple to create a laser that's extremely hard to defeat with most commercial and military eye protection.

>>46772 Oh and widebeams. Widebeams like scatters can do their job instantly with very little aiming required, although unlike scatters are limited to ranges of about 100 yards instead of thousands of feet.

>>46769 >>46770 So in other words a tool that poses just as much harm to the user and allies around them as to its intended target. I fail to see how lasers strong enough to do the things you want them to do aren't the most useless kind of double-edged sword.

>>46777 Pic related, China's permablindness rifle. Take note that the u.s. military uses dazzlers all the time.

>>46778 Ok* Reality will remain reality. Cheap import lasers will remain easy to weaponize.

>>46781 They support legal liberty of speech. Lasers aren't actually illegal and neither is blindness.

>>46781 That's the biggest takeaway I actually have from my laser weapons. Even if something isn't illegal if you try to change a paradigm people will actively try to supress and silence you. If lasers bother you, did you know you can make a sonic blinder/killer, and you can even buy them on eBay?

>>46783 Discussion of completely legal weapons and their use is not a crime. It's not my fault the government forgot to ban these weapons.

>>46785 Actual plasma lightsabers are a thing now, do you wish to ban them as well? If you don't like it lobby your congress to ban directed energy weapons, they might just do so. Not that I would comply.

So you're either 'four chang's' laseranon or a fed larper. Either way it is clear you don't get l a i n c h a n. p.o.l-ethics and associated terminology are frowned on here. Think cyberpunk - non-political technology for the little dude. For example: How does such a laser device work projecting messages through a stencil over a mile away? Is it a viable "non-vandalising remote graffiti 'meme-sniping' system" for projecting memes on a distant wall? How viable is it for modulating encrypted communications like optical digital systems? Have you attempted a high-security low-eavesdropping comms system by transfering data between systems in the infrared wavelength range? Have you considered how this could be used to relay information on law enforcement strategies employed at a protest between disparate groups at that protest? What would you consider the result of such secure-spy-proof communication to be? Would it make Stingray type spying systems obsolete? Is it a viable technique for communicating with and flying a drone? Doesn't this make such a drone control system impervious to all current jamming systems? If not, why? Is it a viable technique for fishing in a survival situation? etc...

>>46675 Enjoy FISA warrant, nerd

>>46765 terrorists have no human rights

>>46805 *humans have no rights

>terrorist A meaningless term used to justify imperialist wars of aggression. I thought you were smarter than this, lainon.

>>46804 Enjoy getting killed the very moment I see you following me. If I even sense I'm being surrounded/followed I'll open fire on you.

>>46841 >>46841 >Screams in anger and mental illness The first time you grabbed me I was unarmed FBI. There will never be a point I'm unarmed again you sad little FBI bitches.

>>46804 I am not afraid of the u.s. gov or it's lackies and I never will be. Come at me again so I can send your units to a fate worse than death! >Laughs in sound, laser, projectile, and electron beam weapons Enjoy getting hit by a cobalt60 sterilizer

>>46843 Oh and now that I know your coming again FBI I can be forearmed. Forewarned = forearmed Now I know to switch to the full equipment suite that also lets me detect heat and strong radio coms, so I will hear your encrypted coms when you roll up to surveil. I will be waiting

>loads handguns with armor piercing ammo with rightous intention >Loads 300 winmag rifle with m2ap pulls

>>46843 You literally posted a picture of a japenese nuclear accident that has nothing to do with lasers. I hope this thread gets wiped off the face of the earth. >>46844 This schizzo posting is like posting "don't come to school tomorrow" memes. This fool is doxxing himself by discussing his hardware and posting pictures of his weapons and implying he has been already investigated by the FBI. Also now discussing how he is waiting for the feds with guns ready.

>>46846 >>46846 I'm already survieled constantly. You already have agents on me fool. Ever heard of payload shells? You can put anything in these. Thorium dust is legal to own funnily enough.

>>46848 >Muh doxxing >Literally an entire two years of posting and surveillance >Your vans literally flee when I even point a emptied out camera with exposed wires at them I'm so afraid of your empty threats these last two years FBI.

>>46849 >>46849 Its just so funny because super capacitor builds even if you surround me I'll activate the multi frequency scatters all over my body. I'm sure you will all be fine! I do not, and will never recognize your authority. As I have said 10k times: Get the balls to arrest me and not run away like cowards or shut up

>>46846 Also; that's what will happen to someone of hit with a heavy metal processing gun. It will give you radiation poisoning.

This thread is is beyond autistic, beyond schizo, whoever you are, you belong in Auschwitzo.

>>46852 This poster is an impotent federal officer.

>>46852 >Schizzo alaska anon posting his warrant and saying he is going to use radiological weapons against the feds I hope lainchan isn't about to get taken down

>>46854 Except that's my literally normal posts. Nothing will happen to lain. If anything they will just add more surveillance.

>>46855 Same ultimatum as always, leave me alone and don't let me see you and everything and everyone will be ok. It should be noted I've shown maybe 5% of what I really can do and have. I always love to hold the good stuff back, bug ide love to use it too. So your choice FBI, harrass me again at risk, or just let me live and nothing bad happens. Your call you ego driven child molesters.