Into the Deep Web, .onion Edition

Ok Anon, clearnet has had its run. Besides the obvious issues, most of it is low quality brewing soykaf, and 5 sites reeposting screenshots of the other 4. Silver age of the internet has come to a close. We now face a new dark age of low or no quality content, heavily policed, and tied %100 to IRL. No fun. Its time to start exploring the Deep Web. To quote Black Sabbath: INTO THE VOID. .Onion-land edition: Historical ---------- http://zqktlwiuavvvqqt4ybvgvi7tyo4hjl5xgfuvpdf6otjiycgwqbym2qad.onion/wiki/index.php/Main_Page - the original hidden wiki. Mostly useless but good refrence for cyber-archeology. Clearnet Jump Points -------------------- https://www.reddit.com/r/onions - "Things that make you cry" https://deepdarklink.com/ Clearnet mirrors ---------------- https://onion.link/ https://onion.to Start points ------------ http://darkfailllnkf4vf.onion/ - nother list of links http://t7tb43a7gvl6wb7j.onion/ - more linkz http://danielas3rtn54uwmofdo3x2bsdifr47huasnmbgqzfrec5ubupvtpid.onion/ - Daniels's Homepage. Good first stop. Free Email and Jabber accounts for the darknet. Before you take a deep plunge setting up contact to communicate with the people you find, or find better darknet comms. Search Engines -------------- http://xmh57jrzrnw6insl.onion/ - TORch Social Networks --------------- http://galaxy3m2mn5iqtn.onion/ - Galaxy 3 http://atlayofke5rqhsma.onion/ - Atlayo http://connectkjsazkwud.onion - Connect http://dreadditevelidot.onion/ - Dreddit Blogs ----- http://kxojy6ygju4h6lwn.onion/ - Flashlight Email and other comms --------------------- http://torbox3uiot6wchz.onion/ - Torbox. Email http://danielas3rtn54uwmofdo3x2bsdifr47huasnmbgqzfrec5ubupvtpid.onion/ - Daniels's Homepage. email and jabber Pastebins and uploads --------------------- http://depastedihrn3jtw.onion/ - Deep Paste http://matrixtxri745dfw.onion/ - Matrix image uploading/hosting Wierd soykaf ---------- http://queenkxfax3izzer.onion/ - Puzzel http://evilchatxp24s7vb.onion/chat.php - "Evil Chat". Mostly desererted HTML chat http://76qugh5bey5gum7l.onion/ - Deep Web Radio. Streaming music

>original hidden wiki You're a fuarrrking moron. The original hidden wiki predates the long onion names. This thread is such bait, psy op, cop bullshit,

didnt we have another thread about this soykaf, go away glowers

>>24881 The point of having a ring is to never let anyone in so this derpnet stuff can't take off until the actual surface Internet is 100% dead, meaning no flaming and no copyright infringement. Once that's done for good then people will totally invent new communities and the governments will get hardcore scared. That's why they don't push it as it is anymore than they have, they don't want actual layered rings. They wipe their foreheads glad that it's just college kids buying weed so far and hermit dreamers on dead sites.

>>24881 What part of any of this is compelling? Free email? Some guy's homepage? A Pastebin? Wow, so amaze, very hackerman. The deep web is just boring illegal garbage like hitmen, drugs and CP. Who even cares about any of that. Zzz.

deep web is a great way to see how soykaf the early internet era actually was.

>>24984 >The deep web is just boring illegal garbage Working out how to change this fact seems like a worthy challenge. I get why people are soykafting on OP, we all know what darknets are and what they currently offer so the proselytizing tone is at best unnecessary. However, there are compelling reasons for communities like ours to begin "colonizing" darknets, so I don't think the advocacy is entirely unwarrented (although yes, we have had this thread before).

>>24988 You just wit till Facebook opens NNTPchan node

>>24984 >What part of any of this is compelling The most important part of darknet isnt the content as much as the platform lain. The darknet is currently a bandwidth restricted, privacy centric, read-write democratic, indie web. Hidden sites generally have a scway 90s feel, work without js, and come without tracking. Its read-write because anyone can trivially create a hidden service without "business class" internet, NAT, static IPs, DNS registration or government interference. Anyone who cares about freedom, decentralisation, privacy and an acorperate environment should be advocating for and using hidden services as much as possible. Use ddgs hidden service. Use protonmail hidden service. Create a simple hidden blog - js free please. Lainchan should have a hidden service.

>>24989 >there are compelling reasons for communities like ours to begin "colonizing" darknets, so I don't think the advocacy is entirely unwarrented Well torisgon* sec forums , torum and envoy all exist. 8kuns /cyber/ is slow.

>>25162 >Create a simple hidden blog - js free please. I'm working on this very thing: a single- or multi-user blogging system designed to be friendly with Tor and other darknets, that anyone with minimal technical knowledge can run, with an installation process that takes about sixty seconds. I'm about a week or two away from a first bugtested production release and a demo site. (I'm sure that there's existing solutions out there, but a big reason for this project was a learning exercise for myself as well. I wanted to see if I could do it myself.) Features: - No javascript whatsoever. No webassembly whatsoever. Output from server binary is simple html and css, nothing obfuscated. - Ease of installation. It's a single binary (written in Go). Source is AGPL'd. The database is sqlite3. The config file is just a few lines long and includes some basics like site name, port number, file locations. All necessary files are automatically generated on first-run if they don't exist. Installation consists of telling your OS to run the binary in the background with whatever method your OS normally uses, setting the working directory to where the binary lives, and pointing a Tor hidden service entry at the running binary's port. - The admin password is randomized and displayed on the command line the first time the program is run. There's no default password to exploit. - Genuinely cross-platform. If cgo works on it, this works on it, which is practically every modern OS and architecture under the sun. (I'm thinking about refactoring it all into using a simpler key-value store instead of sqlite, so that even that cgo requirement isn't needed anymore, but that would be for the 2.0 release down the line.) - No bloated CSS frameworks. The guiding philosophy is that the hosted site must be lightweight enough to load within seconds on a 1990s dialup connection. - Posts use plain standard markdown. - Completely anonymous posting by default. Admin can disable this if they want. - User self-registration, no email or captcha required, by default. Admin can disable this if they want. - No plaintext storage of passwords, only proper salted hashes. Proper strong encryption of cookies too, using a key randomly generated and stored on first-run. - Simple admin page for managing users and posts. - The admin password is randomized on first run and displayed on the command line. A few things to note: - No image posting. Host elsewhere and link to the file with markdown. I'm debating implementing image posting but haven't decided yet. I might implement it but make it a config option that defaults to disabled for anonymous users and users not approved by the admin to post images. If I do implement image posting it's going to strip all metadata, and resize the image to below a size configurable in the config file to maintain a reasonable speed. - No anti-spam measures whatsoever. Disable anonymous posting and self-registration if this is a problem. - No topic structure to displayed posts as of yet, everything is displayed reverse-chronological. Currently working on search and on clickable word clouds. I'll probably go with two clouds: recent (probably prior 30 days) and all-time. Word cloud weights to be configurable on the admin page, with some sane defaults. No "favourites" or "likes" or "hearts" or other nonsense. Use your browser's bookmark feature, that's what it's there for.

>>24881 I just don't see what the use of this is; why would anything tor-based be any better than anything on clearnet? Does your blog become more interesting if I have to connect to it through a hidden service? I suppose it can help to keep the normal people out, but then it just becomes a insider trade, no? I think the most interesting thing about the internet (which seems to have become much more scarce) was the opportunity for a noob to become a pro based on online resources.

>>25271 At this point it'd only be better if the content of the blog concerned illegal material and activities.

>>25271 >>25272 .onion-based addresses means you don't have to pay the DNS mafia. >opportunity for a noob to become a pro What's hard about downloading Tor Browser?

>>24913 What do you mean by ring? Noob here

>>24881 So, is there anything to do there aside from buying weed? Any anonymous forums at least (that aren't about drugs)? It's even soykaftier than the normal person internet it seems.

>>25271 some of it comes down to frontier spirit. i think that's what OP is getting at. the internet stopped being the wild west over a decade ago. you can self-host a blog or whatever but the urban infrastructure of social media and search engine indexing is there to support you, so on some level you'd be foolish not to use it. darknets represent an opportunity to reject all of that and forge out into cultural territory that isn't so well charted. it's as much about social opportunity as it is about opportunities afforded by the technology itself. how will people behave when there is a relatively strong guarantee of anonymity and no social media clout to be had? well, it will be kind of like the early days of the internet, but things aren't exactly how they were back then so it will also be kind of different. of course the first settlements are pirate kingdoms; this is always the case. however, there is another side to this coin. the technical ability to connect to tor isn't anything special, but willingness to conduct yourself among criminals outside the reach of the internet police requires a degree of technical know-how for self-preservation, as well as a bit of courage and self-assurance. this is what characterizes what i'm calling frontier spirit.

>>25271 >why would anything tor-based be any better than anything on clearnet? Because hidden services use an anonmity layer on both sides and preserve privacy. They also allow *anyone* the ability to self host without business class internet, nat, static ip or dns. >>25272 >At this point it'd only be better if the content of the blog concerned illegal material and activities. One of the most exciting aspects of darknet developing is people adopting it for legal things. Galaxy, Forums. Etc. Its good to have cover traffic on tor for those who need it and make privacy the default. >>25279 >Any anonymous forums at least Check out onion.live . there are tons of forums. Torum is active but needs more interesting people. 8kun /cyber/ is awesome but super slow.

The most I've ever seen tor being used for is to circumvent DMCA overall theres still nothing overly interesting there, frontier or not it's not like you'll settle down on a piece of land that can grow no crops or anything else of use.

>>25374 >it's not like you'll settle down on a piece of land that can grow no crops or anything else of use. Lainchan is *our* corner of cyber space. There isn't a reason we should cyberstead tor.

>>25394 Pretty much.

>>24881 Can we get a lainchan proxy via hidden service ?

isnt tor compromised and basically just a honeypot at this point

>>25907 no

>>25907 To expand on >>25932 : Organized crime syndicates like the FBI control a lot of end points, but because of the way TOR works you're safe as a user- they can't distinguish your traffic from the rest of it. What IS potentially dangerous is operating an end point yourself. All of the traffic it generates looks like your own so now you've got the feds banging on your door asking why you smoke plants. But if you know what you're doing (as most gateway hosts do) you should be just fine

>>25945 So what, being on X site for ordering drugs means they can't figure out who I am?

After you get used to the anonymity of Tor you don't really want to connect to the internet using bare connection.

Tor doesn't work against a global adversary like the NSA. So, better not piss off the US govt

>>25969 Hello, friend. I'd rather enjoy a citation for such a big claim. I understand that we can make a connection by seeing some x percentage of nodes being ran by various government agencies. This makes us able to assume the possibility of this being true. However, I'd rather have something a little better to back that statement up. For example, do you have some statistics that show exactly or even roughly the amount of nodes that exist VS the ones owned by the federal government? Do you have a paper or any type of precedence of such a thing? I do recall reading a document that showed one of the tasks for NSA agents was to spread a little bit of fear involving tor and such because it was "so difficult for them to find people". However, we could see that as a part of some info war they are waging on people, right? Anyways, any information you could provide would be appreciated.

>>25970 Get off your lazy ass and do a search you fuarrrking idiot. https://tails.boum.org/doc/about/warning/index.en.html#index10h1

>>25970 This post glows.

>>25966 This. >>25969 Is clearnet better than using tor ? Dont let the perfect be the enemy of the good. X is a probably with tor isnt fixed by just not using tor.

>>25971 Lazy? When you make a claim you're supposed to support that claim. Thank you for the link....

>>25971 I would specify that "global" adversary doesn't mean controlling everything, it should only be just two endpoints, like logs from your ISP and ISP on the side of exit node or honeypot hidden service hosted at honeypot datacentre. This is why I don't understand why Tor software doesn't at least try to diversify nodes based on country and autonomous systems, which would be trivial, as I've once witnessed my chain being France-France-France, which could have turned out really bad happen I doing something that would upset French law enforcement at the moment.

>>25974 If you don't understad how something works, and you know that you don't understand how it works, and someone who (presumably) does makes a comment about it, then it would be better for you to look up whatever they're talking about rather than demand that they justify common knowledge.

Does I2P still have a considerable following, licit or otherwise? I've toyed around with the service a while back and unfortunately I don't seem to see it mentioned like it used to be. Having a quality alternative to TOR could be useful in the event of a security flaw becoming easily exploitable by three letter agencies. Similarly markets have seemed to disappear on I2P to the best of my knowledge. Whether that speaks to its drop in popularity due to it being more difficult to use than TOR or possibly the existence of a backdoor is something I won't speculate on. Perhaps they've just gone deep enough underground that only insiders would know of their existence. TOR markets seem much more comfortable with clearnet advertisements in general. If anybody knows anything about I2P's community I'd love to get some hints. Postman is good and all but its not exactly worth running a whole network over.

>>25987 >(presumably) For some posters here, the illuminati is common knowledge. Your rule is basically "whoever talks first is right".

zeronet any good?

>>26028 It has quite a following and it's easy to use but it's very dependant on javascript.

>>25224 I'd like to see it when it gets done, sounds interesting. Be careful where you post it as to not allure pedos and various kinds of idiots. Good luck with it.

>>25987 >If you don't understad how something works, and you know that you don't understand how it works I never said I didn't though. I know everything about anything you could ever know, as far as you know. Here's my issue: >You make some claim this is "common knowledge" It is not common knowedge. It is debated at every level, including the most tin foil level. >Your link that makes claims that imply that it would be possible. BUT not that it is 100% definite. This does not make for support but only offers a "here's why you may want to consider this possibility". All I am asking is for you to back up your claims. If this is so horrible, so catastrophically damaging to your point: You may want to reevalute the strength of your positions. A little caution never hurt anyone, but outright stating "THIS IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT THE CASE." is bullshit if you have no way of supporting it.

>>25279 >So, is there anything to do there aside from buying weed? Any anonymous forums at least (that aren't about drugs)? Checkout Torum, and Cryptbb.

Anon from the future here,i think Torum fuarrrking died a couple of days ago Darknet is just fuarrrking carding,scamming,bitcoin,drugs and Indian retards at this point. This is really fuarrrking with me:what is the point of being anonymous if there is nothing to do?

>>26891 Make an .onion site as a personal project

>>26891 >what is the point of being anonymous if there is nothing to do? Free speech isn't there to entertain you, anon.

I miss Fresh Onions. I'd spent hours lurking random links. "On the darweb don't click random links you could see things that will torment you all your life" don't care. 90% of scamming carding/gun/hitman/shadoweb/redroom soykafs for normal people. 7% forums and chan, some protected. 3% of weird things, some pretty fuarrrked up. I've stumble on the Tsuki Project onion and it really fascinates me at this time. It opened me to SEL. Today TOR is just about glows and scammers. Some fun places to especially some chans and arty edgy soykafs.

>>26936 Being free to speak to an empty room is not particularly meaningful. The extent to which darknets are cultural centers is the true measure of how well they facilitate free speech.

>>25988 I constantly have it running and like it a lot better than TOR since it's more distributed and can more easily support P2P stuff. P2P is going to be the future of the free internet, and TOR is unsuited for so many connections from every single user. >>26028 Not really. It's P2P, but not anonymous, unless run over TOR, and that's meh since you aren't supposed to run P2P on TOR. They should've gone with I2P integration instead, but didn't. And aside from that, it's all javascript, which doesn't help with speed.

>>26944 Darknet is the room itself. If society cared about the privacy and free speech, the room would be full. But society don't give a fuarrrk, and you blame the room lol.

Darknet scene peaked at 2012-2015. Nowadays it's just watered down drug, fraud and some cp discussion. I wonder where people who were around at silkroad era are now.

>>26939 Tsuki migrated as an onion? would explain the disappearance of the project and it's imageboard.

>>26950 Bootstrap the scene. There is so much fragmentation between like-minded people who always claim their scene is dying. /Cyb/ boards are a natural fit for the darknet community and vicsa-versa.

>>26960 I discovered this randomly clicking on fresh onions that was almost 1 or 2 years ago now. I think it was not even present on the clearwaeb at this time. Never was able to found it again and the only links I could find (on r/onions were dead). I think the soykaf is gone now and the little I know there was a sort of drama... Anyway, I never went very far in the rabbit hole but I liked the concept and atmosphere.

>>26948 I'm educating on i2p and as I see you could access zeronet through i2p. But I'm not still familiar with it to be sure. I think it's zeronet instances accessibles as eepsites.

>>26973 SWIM was a regular client on SR and Tonet user back in the early 10s, never came back after DPR got v& and got all BTC seized by the fuarrrking FBI. I went back after several years and it's really really soykafty compared to what it was. Most of the discussion is happening on Dread and it's mostly about drugs. Honestly, the only like-mindedness that I can find online these days it's on this website and a couple of other chans. The rest is soykaf. I wish I could join some nice webring with my blog and live in the underworld forerver.

>>27238 The only true drug community I know of that exists on the darknet is The Majestic Garden. They're real utopians, even many of the vendors. It is weird how much of the psychedelic underground is actually on the clearnet -- shroomery and dmt-nexus both operate openly. I wouldn't use them to make deals though. Besides that, most stuff is still on IRC. Some libgen people are operating on Matrix/IPFS/zeronet now. There is also retroshare, it is a little janky but it does work, if you leave it running for long enough. There used to be some lains using it regularly, wonder what happened.

>>26974 i was involved with it from the start, it was just le internet community with general staff drama. tsuki was a schizo. last i heard they were on jabber, but i wouldnt be surprised if the whole thing fell apart. tsuki tried to hack me multiple times because i promoted skeptical discussion about the project. be glad it's dead.

>>27238 >I wish I could join some nice webring with my blog and live in the underworld forerver. Galaxy2 was decent. Check out Galaxy3.

I distrust tor out of a few fundamental facts about its funding and who directs its development, all reported on in easily accessible news media sourcing the tor project's tax filings and foia requests: 1) around half of tor's funding comes from private corporations that include google and facebook 2) the US state department continues to fund development 3) they still receive development guidance on functionality and ux design from the state department, dod, and aforementioned private corporations (js being enabled by default, for instance) 4) funding for the tor project in general has dramatically increased from all of these sources in the past 10 years, implying that they all profit in some way from it. i think it's reasonable and perfectly rational to assume tor doesn't exist for the user's benefit. that tor is useful to some is a side effect of these funding entities targeting users in places like china, iran, syria, etc. for monitoring dissidents and getting those with restricted networks to use their products, so if you're not in one of those places you may feel safe. but with these facts being stated, someone who is serious about reasonable security over a placebo effect would assume that most (not "some") entry/exit nodes are monitored and correlated with clearnet activity. i'd like tor users to ask themselves a couple of things. are you aware of all this and accept the risk, maintaining the incredible burden of discipline and hygiene required to use tor securely? or do you ignore these inconvenient facts simply because tor is the only remaining viable option?

>>27269 >i'd like tor users to ask themselves a couple of things. are you aware of all this and accept the risk, maintaining the incredible burden of discipline and hygiene required to use tor securely? or do you ignore these inconvenient facts simply because tor is the only remaining viable option? I am very hygenic about Tor use. It is just one part of many for my online security.

>>27270 >I am very hygenic about Tor use. It is just one part of many for my online security. that's good to hear lainon, and it's encouraging. however, my concern is that you're in a very tiny minority of tor users.

>>27272 probably. That's fine; most Tor users don't need strong anonymity anyway. Their use of the network allows those of us who need it to have good cover traffic. In China (for example) the situation is more delicate. Users need to use VPNs or encrypted SOCKS proxies such as shadowsocks to use Tor, even with entry guards. I think it is almost certain that the US state department funds Tor because it can be used to destabilize such countries, not to mention act as a communications channel for their own intelligence networks.

>>27276 >I think it is almost certain that the US state department funds Tor because it can be used to destabilize such countries, not to mention act as a communications channel for their own intelligence networks. It's not just speculation but recorded fact. It's been reported on by people like Yasha Levine (someone vehemently hated by EFF adjacents), who has researched the tor project's publicly available tax filings and FIOA reports to write about ongoing state and private funding sources. You're on the money about it being used to destabilize the US's enemies, as this has been reported on as well. I would recommend his book 'Surveillance Valley' which is a decent short non-technical overview if you're the type who can stomach some valid criticism of tor and some of the first-principle assumptions network privacy advocates have about the internet itself.

bump

>>25965 Hidden services are very safe, but traffic which goes through tor and onto the clear net can be dangerous since the exit node can read the final output packets and MITM, so it's important to still use HTTPS or some other way of encrypting your traffic.

https://dark.fail/ https://onion.live/

nobody posted http://nanochanqzaytwlydykbg5nxkgyjxk3zsrctxuoxdmbx5jbh2ydyprid.onion

>>24881 Lainchan should have a hidden service. The Lainchan web-ring should have hidden services. Everyone here seems to be really concerned with the state of the internet, but unwilling to actually experiment with any alternatives proposed. Lainchan has a twitter and github but not fediverse stuff. Lainchan is just a larp for people not actually willing to decentralize anything.

>>26948 >and TOR is unsuited for so many connections from every single user They've been investigating ways to make TOR work so that it won't become unusable as the amount of users rises due to how it handles nodes. Its a project mostly driven by Mozilla wanting to directly integrate TOR with firefox private browsing so it might never actually get done.

>>30178 I strongly agree, for a site that already allows tor posting and has a userbase inclined to use tor there is little reason not to have a hidden service.

>>30178 The vast majority of the privacy stuff is a huge LARP/venture marketing buzz. The only people who take it seriously are doing something criminal with it. >>30181 >>26948 It's not TOR, it's Tor

>>24881 >>24913 >They wipe their foreheads glad that it's just college kids buying weed so far and hermit dreamers on dead sites. ...Which is why they've busted multiple online-dealers.

>>30178 Apparently so. I've also noticed that messages that try to correct misinformation on Lainchan seem to mysteriously get odd error messages and won't post. isn't that curious?

Alec Muffet maintains a reliable and useful list of "Real World Onion Sites". Sorry, no 1337 h4X0r stuff. https://github.com/alecmuffett/real-world-onion-sites

>>30352 None of those sites even remotely forbidden in any country on Earth. They don't even list piratebay and rutracker, absolutely pointless list. I'd rather trust clearnet domain of said websites than some random Microsoft/GayHub page linking onion domains.

>>30582 Not him, but did you even read the introduction? It's a list of onion addresses for mainstream websites and explicitly excludes piracy sites.

Anyone know a good marketplace to get some body armour? I've bought some soykaf on Empire, but couldn't find any body armour.

>>30668 >body armour i guess just try to find some cheap motorcycle stuff? seems silly to use an onion for this j

Is it safe to go on the deep web?

>>30685 Nothing is safe, you risk death by existing.

>>30685 Safer than using Chrome or paying for "VPN".

>>30685 Only if you wear your hacker hoodie

>>30715 fuarrrk I forgot to attach it

>>30681 >seems silly to use an onion for this I meant bulletproof vests and what not, they're illegal here

>>24881 >http://archive.is/HOIV4 >23% of the Tor network’s exit capacity has been attacking Tor users >The full extend of their operations is unknown, but one motivation appears to be plain and simple: profit. >They (selectively) remove HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects to gain full access to plain unencrypted HTTP traffic without causing TLS certificate warnings. >It appears that they are primarily after cryptocurrency related websites — namely multiple bitcoin mixer services. They replaced bitcoin addresses in HTTP traffic to redirect transactions to their wallets instead of the user provided bitcoin address. This is why we need to operate tor nodes. The tor network needs relays to be operated in a decentralized way, by people acting in good faith. Operating a relay is only a few dollars a month, and can be paid in BTC. Its an awesome opportunity to improve your system administration skills while providing a community service. Get in here alice. Operate a relay.

>>30811 Can you post the original link? I don't want to solve google captcha.

>>30813 https://medium.com/@nusenu/how-malicious-tor-relays-are-exploiting-users-in-2020-part-i-1097575c0cac

>>30811 How would you suggest hosting a relay for a few dollars a month via bitcoin? I've been tempted but the legal issues with exit relays have always scared me off and I don't have a dedicated enough box to be able to do a standard relay.

>>30819 Get a VPS, preferably accountless that will let you pay with crypto. Some allow you create accountless VPSs payed in crypto from a hidden service.

>>30819 I wrote a simple guide for you here lain: >http://cgjzkysxa4ru5rhrtr6rafckhexbisbtxwg2fg743cjumioysmirhdad.onion/blog/run-a-tor-node-learn-by-doing.html >Running a Tor node is an excellent way to advocate for privacy while learning system administration. The cost is likely a lot cheaper than you think.

>>31115 Thanks, thats really helpful.

hello, anon. >the last onion you'll ever need http://xbvdi24nkz3arqhfckgu6wkjql6nlvuatgbm2zgqbfqhbb5migkxyuyd.onion/ >no rules no logs >file upload and irc >privatebin clone >onion gentoo binhost

Is i2p-bote still a thing? Has there been any work to bring it or a clone to tor and clearnet? Mail servers suck for privacy, yet nobody seems to be pushing a real solution.

Some of you managed to run i2p over Tor?

>>30811 I've been thinking on this but does this not actually strengthen the network against state actors. The fact that so many exit nodes are controlled by actors in active opposition to the state would make it harder for them to control enough nodes for them to carry out correlation attacks on as many communicatons. SSL stripping is only a concern if you aren't checking that your connection is encrypted which you should be before moving crypto anyway.

>>24881 >I've been thinking on this but does this not actually strengthen the network against state actors. The fact that so many exit nodes are controlled by actors in active opposition to the state would make it harder for them to control enough nodes for them to carry out correlation attacks on as many communicatons. SSL stripping is only a concern if you aren't checking that your connection is encrypted which you should be before moving crypto anyway. Depends on your goals and perspectives. What prevents the state from conducting attacks against bitcoin addresses? If your state is North Korea or China, its virtually certain they would. Other states are less certain. Protecting Tor from governments is perhaps not the goal. Perhaps you want to protect Tor from Cyber Criminals. Generally, decentralization is a positive thing. So, I understand you may believe cyber criminals as opposed to states as responsible for the behavior and therefore, controlling Tor instead of Government as a positive development, I think that further decentralization is important to security generally. Operate a Node. Its cheap, and you learn alot.

>>24881 Coarse Enigma >http://cgjzkysxa4ru5rhrtr6rafckhexbisbtxwg2fg743cjumioysmirhdad.onion/ My Hidden Blog What does alice think?

every admin, if they care about /sec/, should take a look at this: http://darkfailllnkf4vf.onion/spec/omg.txt

>>24881 8CH is now a darknet imageboard: >http://jthnx5wyvjvzsxtu.onion/cyber/ Its a little rough around the edges with some unfortunately rampant racism and other drok, but there are some seriously schway threads there alice. Lainchan should have a hidden service.

>>24881 >https://cypherpunklabs.com/ Host for Hidden Services, Tor Nodes (including exits), Monero Nodes, and soon Full BTC Nodes. Setup is you basically donate money to operate a node in your name. They will allow you access to the node, but will re-image after you access to prevent anything but auditing. I still think that operating your own tor node is a better learning experience, and even cheaper than this, but, there is a lane for everything, and paying $10/mo. to have an exit node in your name is a good deal.

>>32069 Honestly all the good parts of 8chan already scattered to their own altchans, I don't see any real reason to go back. Lainchan should absolutely have an onion though.

>>32088 8ch /cyber/ is dead. The board doesn't update properly. I try to reread and post daily but there isn't really anything coming back. Cyberpunkforums.com is also effectively dead. I dont have an account, but no one posts. Lainchan is the last bastion of /cyber/ on the net.

>>32505 It's pretty sad. I enjoyed talking about novels, thematically fitting music and all that surrounding cyberpunk. Browsing the cyberpunk related reddit pages is a downer to say the least. There's no real conversation about anything, it's just cross posting random artworks. Maybe when Cyberpunk 2077 releases it's going to properly reignite interest in the genre

>>25224 this is exactly what I'm looking for, if you have it, please post it! I'm building a website for a punk cinema festival in my town as a hidden service and we had the idea to create a page where people could post anything, any link to movies, or whatever that they wanted, a public and free forum to discuss stuff related to the festival. The festival is small enough to not get the attention of pedos I hope when the website's done I'll post the link here

Ratwires: http://6bjckqi7h3cm2bfseh63ukg5ptr77czwm53cfqv7gjwcm6bmvehaaeqd.onion/

>>25988 Well, It's really good for torrenting. And other p2p soykaf. Really god for anon irc too. Now the drug markets and soykaf like that are pretty much non-existant. There's alot more programming and other /cyb/-hobbyist soykaf on there, and that for me is a plus. There are also a few chans/IB's.

So I'm using Escallion to get a nice vanity onion link. The estimate duration is just over 2 days but I've let it run for 3 days already... how great is the chance that their estimate is far off? What's a better estimate? I don't want to fry my hardware/GPU

>>32598 >how great is the chance that their estimate is far off? small but very possible. You have to consider that very unlikely events can still happen. It seems as though a very unlikely event has happened to you.

http://ic3333qpasht5vd6.onion/ posting this here so I'll feel more pressure to continue writing

>>32623 Nice site anon. Keep writing and post on the lainchan webring

>>32623 really fun idea, but i could never stick to such habit keep it going!

>>32623 new address: http://ic3333h2g3p7ffv6ypscxfvgomi2oj7x45xkqzpay6txjl2nlg5qwcid.onion/ >>32654 I did now! >>32685 usually I can't either, I'm interested to see where this'll get me

http://34vnln24rlakgbk6gpityvljieayyw7q4bhdbbgs6zp2v5nbh345zgad.onion/

I started to write a link list: https://qorg11.net/darknet.xhtml

>>34005 Thanks, I've been going through nonochan. This has HUGE potential. Thanks for bringing the 00's back haha.

I made a JS code to collect all the onion links in this thread: var pole = document.getElementById("body"); var a = document.getElementsByTagName("a"); var radek = "x"; var obsah = "\n"; var count = 0; while(count < a.length) { if(a[count].href.search(".onion")>=0) { radek = a[count].href; obsah = obsah + radek + "\n"; } count++; } pole.value = obsah;

>>35579 Thank you, lainon. I've had this thread bookmarked for a while and this is pretty helpful. Any more links?

>>35579 >I made a JS code to collect all the onion links in this thread: You can also eat soup with chopsticks. curl 'https://lainchan.org/Ω/res/24881' | grep -o '\w\+\.onion' | sort -u